The playwright “No Exit”, by Jean-Paul Sarte has been a playwright and book of many discussions. Many questions have arisen since its publication, and interpretations have been considered regarding the meaning of the book, or what Sarte was trying to convey through his dialogue and characters involved in the novel. Many consider Sarte fascinations with the afterlife, freedom, and other supernatural aspects somewhat intriguing; while also exhibiting a disturbing feature in his writing. However, in this specific he allows the reader to encounter hell in their own way, and interpret through many different meanings such as: isolation, conflict, and stubbornness. He achieves this purpose through dialogue and symbolism. As the play starts we are
…show more content…
The import of their shared action, which proceeds through unique choices in a realistic time that is simply out of phase with the accelerated time they glimpse on the off-stage earth, becomes explicit when the door of the room flies open and all nevertheless insist on remaining inside. In that moment of truth. Sartre challenges the characters with the opportunity to abandon the known and enter the void of the uncreated. All bluffs are called. Who can say what would happen if someone walked out of that open door? (Whitaker)” The dialogue of the characters when given a chance to escape, was also changed. We could finally see desperation at its fullest, as well as fear of the unknown, which is the deeper meaning of the whole story. What is the place they call hell? Why is it set up in the manner, and are these people placed together for a specific purpose? In the novel, there are many different factors and aspects to unearth and learn and discover throughout the play/story. However, there seems to be a stress on the role of freedom, isolation and other people. However, the symbolism lies in the people, and illustrates that pain, conflict, and other emotional tolls are held within you as a person and the consequences spark from your own habits, and not necessarily from a place or
The import of their shared action, which proceeds through unique choices in a realistic time that is simply out of phase with the accelerated time they glimpse on the off-stage earth, becomes explicit when the door of the room flies open and all nevertheless insist on remaining inside. In that moment of truth. Sartre challenges the characters with the opportunity to abandon the known and enter the void of the uncreated. All bluffs are called. Who can say what would happen if someone walked out of that open door? (Whitaker)” The dialogue of the characters when given a chance to escape, was also changed. We could finally see desperation at its fullest, as well as fear of the unknown, which is the deeper meaning of the whole story. What is the place they call hell? Why is it set up in the manner, and are these people placed together for a specific purpose? In the novel, there are many different factors and aspects to unearth and learn and discover throughout the play/story. However, there seems to be a stress on the role of freedom, isolation and other people. However, the symbolism lies in the people, and illustrates that pain, conflict, and other emotional tolls are held within you as a person and the consequences spark from your own habits, and not necessarily from a place or