Devolution, Separatism, And Unionism: The Scottish Government

Improved Essays
The country of Scotland was granted the limited ability to govern its own affairs in 1998, and the first term of the Scottish government began in 1999. This essay will be attempting to explain the events of 1979 and onwards that led to the establishment of our devolved government, the powers and functions of our Parliament and Executive, and the impact of devolution on life in Scotland. It will also describe the impact of the proportional representation offered by the Additional Member System of voting. Finally, this essay will look at arguments on the concepts of Devolution, Separatism, and Unionism as applied to Scotland, and which of Scotland’s major political parties support them.
The first referendum on the issue of Scottish Devolution
…show more content…
It consists of 129 elected Members of Scottish Parliament (MSP’s) and is based in Holyrood. It serves the same function as the UK Parliament, proposing and passing legislature. However, it can only make decisions on devolved matters, such as Tourism, Education and Housing. It cannot create legislature based on reserved matters, such as Defence, Immigration and Employment. Only the UK Parliament is allowed to suggest and pass legislation on those issues (The Scottish Parliament,). If the Scottish Parliament considers an issue regarding a devolved matter to be better handled through UK wide legislation, they can referred up to Westminster. Devolution has allowed Scotland to make decisions on its own legislation in several areas important to its development. In some cases, legislation first passed in Scottish Parliament later goes on to be adopted down in Westminster for the whole UK. An example of this would be the Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Act in 2005, which made it an offence for people to smoke in enclosed areas, or for establishments to permit people smoking in those areas, which was then enforced UK-wide through the Health Act 2006 for England and Wales and the Smoking (Northern Ireland) Order 2006 for Northern Ireland (ash.org, 2015). The idea that the Scottish Parliament can create legislation independently of the British Parliament could be seen as a challenge to its …show more content…
Because it is not divided into two houses with different priorities (like with the House of Lords and the House of Commons), the political process can be considered less complicated and confrontational than down in Westminster. This is also claimed to be reflected in the shape of Holyrood’s chamber benches, which is that of a horse-shoe, instead of the rectangular shape of those in Westminster, where the parties directly face each other (Lockhart, 2014). It attempts to be more open and public with its political processes, a value which is reflected in its more modern, less imposing building. It has yet to accumulate the plethora of traditions and oddities that surround the Westminster-based parliament.
The Scottish Executive is roughly analogous to the UK Executive, being responsible for enacting and enforcing legislation. Elections are held every 4 years. They are led by the First Minister (analogous to the UK's Prime Minister), who is nominated from among their MSPs. Like the Scottish Parliament, it is primarily concerned with devolved matters, but it is also obligated to enforce UK-passed legislation. Which party makes up the Scottish Government is decided by which party owns the most seats in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Committees are messy. Few, if any, routinely reach mainstream media attention (see Section V). Less generate political traction. And when committees become important, they not so infrequently become televised, more politicized, and then largely ignored by stakeholders. Consequently, when deciding on a normative lens, the study of House of Commons committees should rely on Deborah Stone’s polis model specifically because of its focus on realpolitik instead of the idealism rejected in the introduction.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opinion piece, written by Senator Leo Housakos and published earlier this year in the Montreal Gazette, talked about the Senate’s attempt to improve the connection between this parliamentary institution and the Canadian citizens. As stated in the article, the Senate tried to deepen the connection between citizens and the institution by cultivating a better communication amongst them. According to Senator Housakos, transparency and accessibility go hand in hand with good governance, meaning the main purpose behind the Senate’s actions was their desire to be more open about their committee meetings and about the decisions that were taken. At the same time, Senator Housakos highlighted the Senate’s significance in the Canadian constitution…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Say No To Independence No. Say no to independence, I believe that scotland should not be independent and it should remain in the UK. I don't want to live in a country where i don't feel safe, where my government doesnt support our services, and i certainly don't wan to live in a country with a very poor economy. First of all scotland are alot safer in the uk as The Foreign Office noted that 'enemies of britain would use "uncertainty and distraction" in the wake of a yes vote to manipulate the situation for their own ends'.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1980 Quebec Referendums

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A crucial aspect of any political question is the demographic regarding the issue. A referendum is a vote performed by the affected public relating to a specific issue. Therefore, the 1980 and 1995 Quebec referendums about pursuing sovereignty greatly rely on the general public’s view. Upon analysis of the results of both votes, it is clear that independence for Quebec should not be granted. In the 1980 referendum, in which 84.3 percent of the Quebec population voted, 59.5 percent of voters were opposed to the idea of Quebec seceding from Canada, leaving the remainder 40.5 percent in favor of the idea (“1980 Referendum”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 14, 1787, the Federal Convention met at the state house which is now Independence Hall but for two weeks they adjourned meetings until they met their quorum. On May 25th 1787 all states are present except for Rhode Island. But by May 29th, Edmund Randolph presented a plan called the Virginia Plan which was written by James Madison and would provide for a strong centralized government composed of three branches, the judicial, executive and legislative to avert any corruption of power. Madison 's plan describes two houses: one with members elected by the people for 3-year terms and the other older leaders elected by the state legislatures for 7-year terms. Both would use population as the foundation for dividing seats among the states.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the result of the 2010 Australian federal election, the issue of whether or not the health of Australia’s liberal democracy necessitating a two party system is debated academically. In this essay it is argued that a two party system is not essential thus the opposing proposition not confirmed by the result of the election. Relevant and contemporary arguments are presented in support of the premise that a hung parliament is of benefit to the health of Australia’s liberal democracy. First, academic definitions of Australia’s liberal democracy and tow party system are discussed. Second, research shows a two party system as an elitist system supported by neo liberalists and an affront to liberal democratic principles.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australia’s parliamentary system is categorised as a fusion as opposed to a separation of powers as the executive branch is answerable and part of the legislative branch. Each branch of government should work within their areas of responsibility so they act like checks and balances on each other with 100 years of stable government testifying to its effectiveness. A fourth way which holds the governmental branches accountable is the citizens of the country, they form a check and balance system. Citizens are able to judge a government come election time but Parliament holds governments responsible for their actions in-between elections (Fenna, 2014). Australia uses a liberal system of government which implies that there is a need to have limits of the power of governments as indicated by (Fenna, 2014).…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Topic 1: “Should QLD reinstate an upper house?” The actions of Queensland Politicians, over the past years, have produced an object lesson in the dangers of unrestrained authority and as a result has prompted the question, “should Queensland reinstate an upper house”. Although reinstating the legislative council will not amend the many issues facing Queensland, it will be beneficial to return to a bicameral state. In 1922 legislation was passed in Queensland abolishing the upper house, also known as the legislative council, and as a result is the only unicameral state in Australia (Queensland Government 2011).…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now under the leadership of Minister Nicola Sturgeon, which is the leader of the Scottish National Party is seeking a second referendum for independence in 2017. The reason for this second referendum is due to “Britain leaving the EU’s single…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, the separation of powers as seen can be fundamental in keeping the government in check. This stops there from being the same people holding power in many parts of the government, and thus abusing power. As seen separations of power is necessary to protect from abuse of power from the government, and everyday people’s rights, as well as to make sure that there is no corruption with the people in power and to make sure they are doing their…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral System Analysis

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The electoral and party systems have important implications in the Canadian political system, but their impact runs deeper than simply forming a new parliament every time an election takes place. The relationship the systems share has political and social impacts. Author Alan C. Cairns discusses the functions of the two systems and the effects they have on the electorate in his article “The Electoral System and the Party System in Canada, 1921-1965*.” The electoral system used in Canada is Single Member Plurality (SMP,) which is designed in such a way that the outcome of any election is explicit.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If Scotland is going to become independent in the future is still unknown, but it is very possible. After this years brexit, scotland is very open to the idea of independence. During the last vote for independence, on 18 September, 2014 the Results came back as Yes 1,617,989 or 44.70% and No 2,001,926 or 55.30%. The Independence fight is not over yet and probably won’t be for a…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States and the United Kingdom’s system of choosing the leader of vary greatly in how the processes are done. But if one were to investigate and research further into the systems, one would find the fundamental processes are similar in which they operate with only a few key differences between the two electoral processes. One of the major differences between the United Kingdom and the United States is that in the UK citizens do not directly elect the leader of the country, they simply vote for members of parliament, and the party with the most seats in parliament usually has its leader selected by the Queen as its prime minister. (UK Parliament 2015) The difference between that process and the one present in the United States is that…

    • 2495 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Majoritarianism Analysis

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Majoritarianism In the Context of British Politics In a nutshell, majoritarian politics is democracy taken to a more extreme level. Majoritarian governments are designed to favor the ideas of the ruling majority, as well as pass legislation based on the views of that group. The government of the United Kingdom has historically been majoritarian; utilizing a system built on fast and simple decision-making. In accordance with its historical roots, can the same tenets of majoritarianism be observed in the modern-day government of the United Kingdom?…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Legislative branch comes the Executive branch and is made up of the President and Vice President as well as their advisors and government agencies. In the second article of the Constitution, the Executive branch is assigned its own powers and roles in helping run the country’s government and people. Although the main function of the Executive branch is to execute the law, the Executive branch is divided into five different roles or “chiefs.” As Chief Executive, the president is in charge of making sure that all abide by the laws passed by Congress, send forth executive orders to the public, nominate judges and even those in the Supreme Court with the Senate’s consent, choose government officials depending on Senate approval, and acting…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays