The book uses the example that a man who kills an intruder attacking his child is labeled a hero whereas a man who kills a cashier in the process of a robbery is labeled deviant even though the act of murder was the same. I do not agree with this example because i feel that the fact that the man was robbing the store already made him deviant in the first place. None the less i agree with the labeling theory that it does have to do with context because the act of murder was in fact still the same. It just depends on how people react to what you have …show more content…
How do they expect people not to engage in deviant behavior but have shows where people do and the people come out with of the situation without consequence. If people are so opposed to deviance why does it entertain them? That is something i do not understand but again i watch all the same shows all the same movies so why does deviance entertain me? I guess i just know that it 's just television and it 's not real. However, it makes me question if the makers of these films and tv shows want us to be deviant and does the fact that they are making these types of shows make them