Civil War: Development Of Free States Vs. Slave States

Superior Essays
Bronwyn Albright
USI Honors Assignment
Mr. Keller

Development of free states vs. slave states The Civil War was caused by a long and deep seeded conflict between the North and the South. Each region was built on completely different social, political, and economic standards. The South which were considered the Slave States were a slave owning community that followed a strict class based system consisting of the rich, the middle class, and slaves. They depended heavily upon slavery as a way of life. The North, which were considered the Free States was a more industrialized society where most of the community worked in factories. They did not follow a strict class system and had no need for slave labor. The North strongly opposed any use of slavery. This inflamed the South because it threatened their livelihood and their way of life. This conflict of views lead to a competition between the regions for more land. Each wanted to expand to the west. Unrest and tensions grew stronger between the two sides which inevitably resulted in the Civil War.

Compromises made along the way (Missouri Compromise, 3/5 's compromise, Compromise of 1850) The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was the first of the compromises that were intended to calm the tensions over the
…show more content…
He claimed he should be free because he was enslaved while living in the free state of Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory. The Court ruled that his request for freedom could not be granted because he did not possess any property. It went even further, stating that even though he was living in a free state he was still considered a slave and that he was black and had "no rights which the white man was bound". The decision enraged the Northern public opinion which lead to a strong antislavery view. The Dred Scott decision was a major event that caused conflict between the North and the South which eventually lead to the Civil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is one of the main reasons for the division between the Union of the North and the Confederacy of the South, during the Civil War. The North was opposed to slavery because they thrived off of their own self work through industrialization, machinery, and factory work. The south however, accomplished their work by using other people to do it for them such as slaves. The Union ended up winning the war and all the slaves eventually became free. Two opposing views on how the slaves became free are whether president Abraham Lincoln freed them, or they freed themselves.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the Missouri Compromise there was a lot of tension between the North and South because of slavery. Though it became even more heated after the Missouri’s 1819 request for admission into the Union as a slave state, which threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why the balance was disrupted was because before the request from Missouri there were an even amount of slave and free states. As well as, it would set a precedent for congressional consensus to the increase of slavery. So, to help ease the tension between the states Congress created a two-part compromise, which is known as the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cause Of Civil War Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Name: Instructor: Course: Date: The causes of the Civil War The civil war lasted for a period of 4 years from the year 1861 to 1865. The war led to more than six hundred thousand casualties.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On January 1, 1863, an important document was applied which freed all slaves in rebellious states or designated part of a state. This was the Emancipation Proclamation signed and established by President Abraham Lincoln. The Emancipation Proclamation read "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free.” Abraham Lincoln’s main focus in the creation of this document was to con the Confederate states to give up their fight against the Union and join the United States of America once again.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    All strife leading to civil war between the North and South was a direct result of the conflict for economic dominance. Slavery did not cause the civil war. The controversy and conflict regarding slavery was a result of a larger battle for regional economic dominance. Even the conflict regarding land resulted from the struggle for economic power. If either the North or South gained another state, it would come with increased power in the senate by giving one group another two representative, allowing that state to pass policies only supporting its…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is an important aspect of American history; it has shaped our country into what it is today. The civil war took place from 1861-1865. Without slavery, the civil war would not have occurred. Slavery divided the north and south, the differing opinions on things especially slavery is what led to the American civil war. The south expressed how slavery was beneficial for the whole nation because everyone depended on the southern economy and slavery was key to the prosperity of our nation.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But also, “he also gave little indication, even in private, that he was sensitive or sympathetic to the plight of free African Americans in the North” (Fredrickson 57). He also said, “prewar Lincoln was clearly a white supremacist” (Fredrickson 57). Lincoln thought that slavery was morally wrong but also knew that the Negro race would always be inferior to his race. All of this evidence brings us to the question, can a person who espouses a particular set of race-based views and uses racially charged language not be considered a "racist" in one era, yet be regarded as racist in a more modern era?…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The North kept receiving slaves that escaped from the South, which angered the South even further. Southerners were not pleased that the northerners were not accepting their views, which gave the South more reason to start a…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The north believed in a free labor system where everyone had a chance to be successful if they worked hard in their industrialized manufacturing economy. The south believed in slave labor, where planters could get rich from free forced labor in their agricultural dominated economy. The north believed that slavery was a flawed system that created an aristocratic planter class, not allowing for self made success. The south believed that their economy and success relied on slavery, and that without it, the whole economy would collapse. The north believed that secession was unconstitutional, while the south believed that it was constitutional.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays