Determinism In Daniel C. Dennett's Freedom Evolves

Improved Essays
In Daniel C. Dennett’s Freedom Evolves, he takes a compatibilist view of determinism. Dennett’s work evolves around the individual’s ability to function within a deterministic universe while still maintaining some form of free will. This universe is largely deterministic, and human lives are most likely predetermined by an unbroken chain of parental influence since the dawn of complex life. Humanity, however has the privilege of being able to make their own choices, although the concept of true free will is largely inaccurate considering the factors that go into a single person’s choice. Factors such as a person’s upbringing, financial status, cultural conditioning, and others will ultimately affect their decision in nearly any situation. A person may even be genetically predisposed to make certain decisions or behave in certain ways.
A human being is the cumulation of DNA from two parents These inherited genes are the basis of what that human being may become, and severely limit what one can achieve. As Dennett asserts in his book, “It is all but impossible that I will ever give birth, thanks to my Y chromosome I cannot
…show more content…
Humanity has long clung to the ability of ignoring evolutionary predispositions in order to exercise this free will by making choices to benefit others or merely to an individual’s own detriment. Free will is threatened, then, by the idea that every single decision a person may make is the direct result of all the factors that they cannot control. In his book, Dennett argues that free will can coexist with determinism, however, determinism directly affects every single choice a rational creature makes, despite the ability to consider other options. If a human cannot actively choose the circumstances of their birth, their culture, or their education level among a nearly infinite number of other factors, then they cannot truly choose anything for themselves and exercise free

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    It is different with libertarianism as determinism believes that we were already determined by certain causes outside of the power of will, while libertarianism believes in the theory that we are truly free in our choices. They also disagree on the idea of responsibility; determinist does not believe we can be responsible when we have no free will, while libertarians think differently. Although determinism and libertarianism have little to none in common, compatibilism can bring them together. The way that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Although compatibilism and libertarianism are similar, they can also be quite different.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Determinism is an opposed of freewill, in which every action is prearranged by past. The problem with this policy is that no one could be blame for their action whether it’s good or bad-since everything is prearranged. Determinism falls into two further categories: hard determinism and soft determinism. It also means that freewill is predetermine too. Unlike determinism freewill is a very important factor for taking concern, which can create a dilemma in society to punish or praise anyone for his or her actions.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Vs Determinism

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It does not always work out like we want but still is our choice. The reason this appeals so much to me is that I’m a firm believer in if you want something go out and get it. The world around us was made by people who are no smarter than us. Our freedom gives us control which is what we all crave in this crazy world. If you wanted to argue about indeterminism which is that everything we do is random but still lacks freedom of will.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will. Yet the fact that many do not believe in free will is contradictory because their actions prove other wise.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (SEP, pg.1) He believes it is all free will, but can't explain how. It is indeed true that humans often feel that "when making a choice we often sense we have genuine options and that we have the power to choose. We get the sensation that our decisions are ultimately up to us" (Vaughn, pg.337) The fact of the matter is that this experiential sense is illusionary. (Vaughn, pg.337) Our actions are not free and cannot be proven…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of the will, according to Frankfurt, is compatible with determinism; however, his inability to refute the possibility that second order desires may be predetermined allows for the conclusion that all humans truly do not possess freedom of the will and are only under the illusion that they do. In order to fully understand free will, it is important to define it. Free will is determined as the ability to choose between many options and act upon the choice chosen.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That term analyzes, freedom, possibility and control. There are more than one possible futures which still leads to free will. “A soft determinist might propose the following definition of can. Notice that in this sense, a person may have alternate possibilities – multiple actions each of which he can perform – even if all his actions are determined by antecedent causes” (From) Soft determinism allows the existence of free choice. You can choose to do what you wish as an individual but you can not choose what you wish because our wants are determined by our personalities, which are formed by influences outside of our control.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, as do many people, have a natural inclination to believe in the concept of free will, as I want to believe I have control over my own actions. However, I also cringe at the idea of my choices being in a sense random, devoid of my own will which is in itself somewhat of a cause. Thus, Hume’s argument presents an appealing middle ground. Furthermore, I certainly agree that although it may be hard to glean the cause of an event, it does not mean such a cause does not exist. One could possibly question Hume’s definition of liberty, bringing up the example of addiction as a cause, which, although purely internal, complicates the notion of free will in one’s actions.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sartre accepts that “Far from being able to modify our situation at our whim, we seem to be unable to change ourselves. I am not "free" either to escape the lot of my class, of my nation, of my family” (Sartre, 2003, p. 503). Sartre argues that one is free due to one's constant ability to choose our projects in life and we are free to place the meaning we wish to these situations. Sartre's idea of freedom differs from the traditional understanding, and this is especially clear when we consider the Prisoner (Sartre, 2003, p.505). The traditional understanding of freedom revolves around the idea of one's ability to act, to reach one's aims.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is every decision that a human has been making already determined? That everything happens and any action that occurs in the life of a human was meant to happen due to previous events and that their choices weren’t held upon themselves? This determinist view merely seems illogical from a Libertarian perspective. In the school of thought of libertarianism also known as Indeterminism, libertarianism theory is based on that individuals do have a free choice in determining any decision they chose upon in their lives. Indeterminism holds the most convincing explanation that humans possess free will, as well as Existentialism also plays a convincing role in defining human free will.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays