In the murder case of an African- American lady named Martha investigators have narrowed their search do to three possible suspects. The three suspects are Royce Triplett, Kenneth Hubbard and Marcus Maher. Now none of the possible suspect is family members of Martha but has had some form of interaction with her in the past whether it is church related or neighborhood related she knew all three of them. Therefore, we will have to look at the evidence and determine which one of these three men could be the person who in fact killed and raped Martha.…
A sleep-deprived Catherine Galliford is running on adrenalin and ragged nerves after a wild week that saw the RCMP corporal rock her employer with claims that she was sexually harassed and bullied by senior officers, even as she served as the spokesperson for two of the biggest investigations in the force's history. Galliford was calm and competent on camera as the public face of the RCMP's investigations into the Air India bombings that claimed 329 lives, and serial murders committed by Robert Pickton on his Port Coquitlam pig farm. But while Galliford's allegations of harassment reached as far as the House of Commons this week, one of her most explosive claims is only now being made public. Galliford says the rampant sexism within the ranks of the RCMP that ruined her health and career may also have contributed to the mismanagement of the Pickton murder investigation, at a cost of many lives.…
David Milgaard was wrongfully convicted of rape and murder towards Gail Miller, a Saskatoon nursing aide in 1969. He was sixteen and heading on a road trip with three of his friends. He was going to pick up one of his friends at their house before heading out. Larry Fisher lived in his basement in which he rented out. That morning Gail Miller was murdered and David’s friend, Albert Cadrain told the police that “David was acting strange and had blood on his shirt” (Innocents Canada, 2016).…
The Ethical Dilemma If put in a sticky situation, how far would a person go to defend the core principals of their profession, if it meant blurry the line with reality? In 1973, a massive manhunt in New York’s Adirondack Mountains came to an end with the police arresting criminal Robert Garrow. After committing a slew of atrocities, this barbaric man had been brought to justice, with the help of his attorney, Frank Armani, who had been called into the case. However, the conduct in which Mr. Armani acted, was immensely controversial then, and still heavily debated today.…
Detective Sedgely had just two frustrating clues in this major case – A red leather glove and a locker combination and the number of the locker written on a yellow paper. One of the clues (the glove) was useless, so we went to the locker it was neat and organized. However, that changed, we flipped the locker upside down all the books on the floor, paper that had good grades on them went with it. Little posters on a weird looking person whom looked famous was singing and dancing on the stage. Hoping I went back to look at the glove looking for other clues that might help figure out who stole it and why.…
Mary Elizabeth Harriman, the wife of Russell Williams, aided and abetted in his crimes by not revealing his behaviour and actions to the police. Mary Elizabeth Harriman must have been aware of her husband’s illicit conduct but she did not report that conduct to the police. Harriman gained financially from this illicit conduct. She acquired Williams’s assets after he was captured, including his half of the couple’s new townhome in Ottawa. She acquired his half of their $700,000 house in a fraudulent post-arrest deal which was designed to shield his assets from potential litigation.…
The homicide of John Hossack will always be a mysterious cold case. The person who truly killed John will never be known from the very little evidence left in the bedroom. Though with very little evidence all fingers pointed to Margaret Hossack and Mrs. Wright for the killings of their husbands. Therefore, Margaret and Mrs. Wright story didn’t add up to how their husbands were killed and were incarcerated for life. There are two sides to every story, but only John, Margaret and Mrs. Wright knew what happened that very night.…
Societal values, norms and mores have always been an influencing factor when defining crime and deviancy. However, the definitions of certain crimes have stayed more or less constant. For example, murder has always been considered unlawful and wrong but in the late 20th century, certain types of murder that were once considered justifiable, gained inexcusable status. The question is why? What had changed?…
Historical Setting In a 1966 amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the federal government began providing financial aid to states that provided education for children with disabilities. The program evolved into the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) of 1970. After a couple of lawsuits and an updated Act, the government determined that students with disabilities had the right to public education, and parents had the right to participate in the process (Wright, 2010). Amy Rowley, a first-grader with an auditory impairment, and her family filed suit against her school district in the Federal District Court after the New York Commissioner of Education affirmed the school district’s decision to refuse a sign-language interpreter.…
Lucy Pollard was farmer’s wife who was murdered in the county of Lunenburg, Virginia. In fact, many were accused of her death by an ax. Nonetheless, it seems this felony was not only a tragedy, but it shed some light on the question of the justice system of not only in the past, but also today. Understanding the written context that Lebsock presented displays the bigger picture of social and political patterns that have occurred throughout history. Although, times have proceeded to become more livable for minorities; however, this does not justify the behavior of the social and political constructs that continue to trump the constitutional belief of “innocent until proven guilty.”…
Originally aired on the 20th of March 2014, Sarah Koenig produced the podcast Serial ‘The Alibi’ which demonstrates a wide variety of different techniques and conventions to persuade the listening audience of Adnan’s innocence. The way Koenig’s structures her argument, as shown in the transcript, shows to the audience the uncertainty of the prosecution. Did Adnan kill Hae? Is Adnan being framed by Jay? Many questions like this arise in Koenig’s proposal and how she approaches this case.…
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen of the jury. We are here today to decide if the defendant, Mrs. Minnie Wright, is found guilty of the murder of her husband. John Wright, a farmer, who was found dead in his bed by a neighbor, Mr. Hale. Mr. Hale went to see if he could get John Wright to go with him on a party telephone. Mrs. Wright looked queer as she rocked back and forth pleading her apron.…
Straying from the straightforward criminologist story to instead feature realities that had been left buried, the element of truth shines. Not only are Roger and Bernard aficionados of historical truth, the third—and perhaps most notable point of view—inspector Cadin, surpasses his role as policeman to also transition to a seeker of uncovering the truth of the past that had been concealed. The further Cadin travels into this mystery, the more he brings the past to present. In following with the expectations of a detective novel, there are times when Cadin receives bogus leads (p. 73), fails to follow procedure (p. 113), or flat out abandons the case at hand in pursuit of the bizarre heist at the height on the mystery. Throughout the story, we are rarely given the chance to breathe.…
Demographic Information For this assignment I watched Still Alice (Glatzer, 2015). This movies main character is Alice who is a linguistic professor at Columbia University. At the begging of the move she is celebrating her 50th birthday. She is married to John and has three adult children Anna, Tom, and Lydia. After having some issues with her memory Alice decides to see a neurologist who tests her cognitive abilities and does scans of her brain.…
Furthermore, as Rachel lies to the police about what she legitimately knows, it clouds the truth and the communication between her and authority falls apart. Her miscommunication covers up reality as the information Rachel puts forth, leads to the wrong person; covering up who the real offender is. Hawkins examines the way lying demolishes communication and conceals the truth as shown through Rachel and the…