Describe The Role That Courts Play In The US System Of Government And Politics

Decent Essays
This chapter describes the role that courts play in the U.S. system of government and politics. It focuses on three main issues:
• The power problem for the federal courts is legitimacy: the legitimacy of judicial power in a democratic system of government.
• The increased power of the judiciary: the judiciary was originally called the
“least dangerous” branch of government but court critics now refer to an
“imperial judiciary.”
• The courts as government institutions: the relationship between law and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison” (McBride). This case answered the question that the Courts do have the authority to interpret the Constitution and declare acts by Congress and the President unconstitutional. When laws are in contrary to the Constitution, it is the duty of the Courts to review and resolve the issues and apply a decision correct to the law. Lastly, the case set a precedence and brought forward with emphasis that the Constitution is the law of the land and the Supreme Court decision is the final arbiter of the…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial powers are stated in the Constitution and we labeled the Supreme Court, and those courts that are below the highest in the land, congress has the obligation to establish these courts. Distribution of power allows the Supreme Court to have the final say-so in cases involving: ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels. During any other cases the Supreme Court should have the power of court review and the ability to change the outcomes of the lower courts final deacons. Thus the question that will arise is that, if an act is untasteful in the Constitutions terms can the law become the law of the country, this should be an interesting topic for elected officials.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Executive, points out Hamilton, wields, “the sword of the community,” as well as, “dispenses the honors,” thereof. Further, argues Hamilton, the Legislature, “commands the purse,” as well as, “prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.” Contrary to these aforementioned powers, the Judiciary, states Hamilton, “has no influence over either the sword or the purse,” rather judicial power is passive and defensive. Hamilton goes on to argue that the judiciary, in its limited scope, has, “neither force nor will but merely judgement.” The passive nature of the Judiciary’s power means that it cannot “attack,” either of the two other branches, and that, “all possible care,” must be taken in order to ensure the Judiciary is able to defend itself against impositions by the other two…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Antifederalist argue the judges of the Supreme Court are a vital part in the judiciary branch controlling the legislative branch and if need be, the Supreme Court could resort to determining what the extent of the powers of Congress are (AF 78). Next to permanency in office, otherwise known as tenure nothing could contribute more to the independence of the judges than their support…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    government is in complete control. The meaning of communism is as such in which the system of the country is controlled only by a totalitarian dominated party. The court expanded its powers, under the leadership of Chief Justice John Marshall, into the policy-making arena by asserting its power, under the case Marbury V. Madison (1803) to declare an act of congress unconstitutional. In which the court also claimed the right of “judicial review” which is a similar power to declare the actions of state legislators unconstitutional.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges Vs Federal Courts

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The federal court system is quite large today. Despite its current size, the United States Constitution requires only one court but allows Congress to create more as needed. That is the foundation for the current multilevel court structure. In these federal courts, important decisions are made by appointed judges concerning federal legislation and constitutional rights of citizens.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emma Raabe Mrs. Roger American Government 3 March 2017 Each year the United States Supreme Court is requested to take on nearly seven-thousand court cases, but are only able to accept approximately eighty. This statistic is an evident indication of how important the Supreme Court truly is. As the head of the judicial branch, this major court not only makes the final decisions on high level cases, but also has to answer to those who oppose the decisions that they have agreed upon. Also because the Supreme Court is the highest court, it is in charge of all smaller federal courts, which sets the standards for the entire nation’s justice system.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court does not possess the appropriate tools to implement their decisions. Courts cannot actively seek out appellants, appellants have to seek courts in order for their claims to be heard. The courts are described as the least dangerous branch of the government because the judiciary lacks the “influence over either the sword or the purse” (Rosenberg, 15). If the courts lack the political and elite support, the court’s decision will not be effective in its implementation; therefore, the decision will hold no power. Rosenberg argues that even if courts are characterized as producers of social change, it is a mere illusion.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Inarguably, the Supreme Court has played an imperative role in the development and evolution of the fellow coordinate branches of government and in the society of the United States as well, and what is deducible as a consequence of this is that the individuals whom have served within this institution have incorporated, however subtly, their own inclinations into this evolution. Indeed, it is a matter-of-fact that throughout all of our lives, it is impossible to avoid the persuasions of family, peers, and societal constructs upon the reflections and perceptions that we utilize in order to derive our own attitudes, values, and ideologies. Additionally, the scope and position of the Supreme Court has provided it with unique opportunities in which…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    #1 The Supreme Court is an appellate court and the highest court in the United States (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 41). The jurisdiction or legal ability for the Supreme Court to hear a case is established by Article III, Section II of the Constitution of the United States of America (“About,” n.d.). As established by the Constitution, the Supreme Court has both original jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) and appellate jurisdiction which means, it can hear appeals from the highest state courts (sometimes called state supreme courts), special federal courts, federal appeals courts, and when circumstances permit federal district courts (“About,” n.d & Cheeseman, 2013, p. 44). The Certiorari Act of 1925 allows the Supreme to decided, with a few exemptions, whether or not to it will hear a case (“About,” n.d.).…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays