Analysis Of Descarte's Argument For The Existence Of God

Improved Essays
Is our universe one complicated computer game with us being mere artificial intelligence made of ones and zeros? This is a strange question, one that I believe cannot be totally disproven or proven but what can we know no matter the answer? The philosopher Descartes wrestled with similar questions. He was concerned about the nature of our reality and more specifically the nature of our knowledge. (Descartes 166-167) He wanted to form a base for knowledge and a method to prove that what we know is true. Therefore, I believe that Descartes would respond to this problem by proving we have some base knowledge and by making an argument against this idea, however I do not think his theories can prove all of our knowledge.
Descartes did not discuss
…show more content…
With that said I do not want to go over Descartes “Trademark” and “Ontotological” arguments, which argue for the existence of God, but rather his discussion of clarity and distinctness. (Descartes 168-170) Descartes says “A certain opinion of long standing has been fixed in my mind …. That there exists a God.” (Descartes 168) His belief in God gives him the idea that as long as we are perceiving reality with clarity and distinctness God, who is all good and perfect to Descartes, would not deceive us and have us exist in a false reality. (Descartes 168) Whether God exists or not, there are major problems to this theory. First, something being clear and distinct is widely general. For example, at one time everyone thought the sun revolved around the earth. To the people of that time it was very clear and distinct that the sun seemed to move in the sky around the earth making it seem like it was orbiting around it. I think this is not an example of God deceiving us but rather it is a problem with the statement that whatever we perceive clearly and distinctly is …show more content…
Perceiving something with clarity and distinctness is too general to use as a basis for knowledge even if we were sure we were not being deceived. There are certain things that may seem 100% true, and therefore clear and distinct in our minds, which could become false. Not because God is deceiving us but because our perception is not perfect. Then there is the problem that belief in God is necessary for the argument. Based on these issues I do not think Descartes argument can prove all of our knowledge beyond the cogito and therefore cannot disprove with certainty that the universe is a computer

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    For example n Descartes writing of the third meditation Descartes writes that since God isn’t a deceiver because Descartes writes we clearly and distinctly view god as a non-deceiver. Then he says God’s existence provides us with clear and distinct…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To build his argument, Descartes begins by working with the premise of there being a God: “Clearly the idea of God, that is, the idea of a supremely perfect being, is one I discover to be no less within me than the idea of any figure or number. And that it belongs to God’s nature that he always exists is something I understand no less clearly and distinctly than is the case when I demonstrate in regard to some figure or number that something also belongs to the nature of that figure or number.” (Descartes, 59). In this quote, Descartes outlines why he believes that there is a God. The rationality he employs is based upon understanding the concept of God as being supremely perfect.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation Five: Concerning the Essence of Material Things, and Again Concerning God, That He Exists, Descartes claims that he has a new argument for the existence of God, which is different from the one that he gave in Meditation Three: Concerning God, That He Exists. Both Meditation Five and Meditation Three create an argument based on God and His Existence; however, Descartes created a new argument that was different from the previous one. In Meditation Three, Descartes proves that God does in fact exist and that He is not a deceiver. This argument did not only prove an existence,, yet it helped readers, like me, understand that we are not deceived when we are trying to perceive different things around us.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the existence of God, there are many arguments. Some say that God does not exist while others try to explain how the universe was created. Saint Thomas Aquinas gives a cosmological view on whether God exists. In his article, Whether God Exists, he provides five arguments to support his view. The first article talks about motion.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica: Proofs for the Existence of God, is a thirteenth century collection of five deductive arguments that, as the name suggests, supposedly prove the existence of God. In these arguments, or proofs, as Aquinas calls them, there is the assumption that there are some things that only God is capable of making happen – such as motion and cause - and ergo, God has to exist for these things to exist. Aquinas' first argument for the existence of God is that of the 'Unmoved Mover', which draws from Aristotle's ideas of acutality and potentiality to summarise that some things are in motion, but they cannot move themselves, a mover is required. Similarly, Aquinas' second argument, the argument of the first cause, states that some things are caused, and for this to happen they must be caused by something else, a 'causer' so to speak. This essay will assert the argument that whilst neither of these arguments are necessarily invalid, both of them are unsound, as although the logic itself has validity, the…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every aspect of the world found around us could be fabricated. Everything our senses tell us to be true could be a lie. Descartes ideas prove these statements through intriguing logic and convincing hypothesizes. However, there is one argument Descartes, says, can be proven. This is the idea that humans think and have knowledge within their minds.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A perfect deceiver cannot lead one into deceit or error. As a result, if God truly existed, human beings would not be imperfect. Descartes’s arguments contradict one another and thus the clear picture being unclear. During the argument much contradiction transpires as Descartes argues that God is not a deceiver therefore human beings are perfect and at the same time argue that human beings are imperfect and thus their existence is uncertain. Descartes’s arguments are related, and there is no significant difference.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    From this quote he developed his reasoning for the existence of God. Throughout his research he discovered two trademark arguments for the existence of God. Descartes formed an ideology that God is perfect, and could never deceive us. This essay will be exploring the importance of God in the creation of life, how we use our…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Descartes exceedingly pushes that we not trust our sense when it comes to knowledge after being deceived, it seems almost absurd that we begin to believe that just because of one instance when we were mislead. We must have some true knowledge if we are able to notice when we have been mislead so therefore there is now way that point could be validated. Another way that Descartes can be disproven is that if we begin to search for a certain unquestionable principle then how to we know when to stop searching for that first…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So, within his writing Thomas is seeking ways on how to prove God exists using logic. While as a rationalist, Descartes saw reason as his primary source of knowledge. And, using his Meditations, mathematics, and skepticism sought to prove a higher substance (God) had to exist. Historically, not much is know if Descartes truly believed in God, or for the sake of being published hid his atheism. Aquinas argues that the only way to prove God exists is through reason, and with divine revelation even someone unsaved can come to know the…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays