Descartes And The Existence Of God

Great Essays
Descartes is concerned with the uncertainty of knowledge. When we see, feel, hear, and touch the things around us, we think that they are real. Nevertheless, however real something may seem, Descartes suggests that there is no way we can actually know whether or not it exists (without the help of God). Moreover, there needs to be some kind of proof that our ideas and sense-created images of the world actually depict what exists in reality, if we want to have any certainty of it.
Descartes claims to have a clear and distinct idea of God. This God is “all-powerful, perfect and infinite” (cite). He suggests that God has endowed him with the ability to know the reality of the world by reflecting on his reason. The reality of the world consists
…show more content…
For example, we know that 2 and 2 make 4, despite there being no proof of it.] [Another obstacle Descartes must surmount to convince the sceptics to believe in his philosophical system is the fact that having an idea of God does not mean that He actually exists.] [Descartes responds to this challenge with something he calls “the light of nature” (cite). According to this “light of nature,” “there needs to be at least as much reality in the idea as there is in the cause of that idea” (cite). Given that we have an idea of God, the light of nature says that something equally as powerful of more powerful had to have caused it. In effect, due to its infinite nature, we couldn’t have caused it. Only an infinite being could have caused it. This clear and distinct idea of God, along with the facts of the light of nature, shows us that God exists., On that account, God’s perfection assures us that we are not in a dream, that the world is actually the way we perceive it to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes tries to make sense of the existence of God by using Adequate reality, the belief that an idea must have as much formal reality as it has objective…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes was a French philosopher who is considered today as the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. Descartes often fought with the idea of this thing called Skepticism, which is the philosophical position that knowledge is impossible. This did not sit well with Descartes so he decided to write a book called “The Meditations on First Philosophy” as a guide book to the truth. Descartes’ two main aims with this book were first, to address and defeat skepticism, and second, to attain perfect knowledge, which is knowledge that is absolutely certain and indubitable; he aimed to used this idea of perfect knowledge to defeat skepticism. One of the first things Descartes had to do in order to defeat skepticism was look at his own beliefs and doubt all…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There has always been a point in history of Western philosophy when the definition of knowledge had been redefined, debated upon, and rejected. However, many philosophers were more concerned with the essence of knowledge, that is, what does constitute as knowledge and how we can achieve it. In addition, many argue that there are certain knowledge is just not attainable and human mind wouldn’t be able to grasp on the capacity of the higher truths. Nevertheless, one still can question the knowledge they already possess and decided for themselves whether to believe it or not. In this essay I aim to demonstrate Descartes’ arguments for skepticism and genuine knowledge.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Meditations

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes argues that all knowledge from senses can be questioned or doubted, since his senses have often deceived him. He supports this claim with the example that he has sensory…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The simplest of Descartes arguments is the ontological argument (Fifth Meditation) – God is the most perfect being, existence is a more perfect trait then non-existence, god must exist. Another of his arguments is the trademark argument, there is three possible causes for an idea, Innate – an idea that is a part of your nature, Acquired – an idea that has arisen from external forces and Devised – an idea that you created intellectually. Ideas and their causes also have “Realities”, Ideas can belong to the intrinsic reality – the naturally occurring reality, and an Objective reality – the reality of an idea in virtue of its object, Causes can have a Formal reality in which the cause contains as much reality as the effect or an Eminent reality in which the cause contain more reality then the effect. A cause contains as much reality as its effect, something cannot come from nothing so everything must have a…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his second argument, Descartes believes that he exists as something with an idea of God and everything that…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He instead uses these points to show a bigger truth that nothing can be proven with our senses. How can one prove that anything around them is real? Without senses and the knowledge people have been taught over time, there is no way to prove the life around them is real. Descartes argues that nothing is certain without knowledge to back it up. At a time when most philosophers used God to back their…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He establishes that he is included in the category of finite beings. Because of the relationship he established between formal reality and objective reality, he concludes that he and can conceive of other ideas outside of himself because they are finite as well. With this same reasoning, he should not be able to conceive of something infinite—such as God--because he is finite. This leads him to believe that the idea of God is an innate idea—an idea we have by nature. Once Descartes establishes his innate understanding of God, he searches for the possible cause of his idea.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays