Descartes Body And The Mind Analysis

Improved Essays
Imagine a soldier losing his leg after the war. He loses a piece of his body, but does he what happens to his mind? In Descartes’ excerpt, from “Descartes Selections,” he explains how though the detachment of persons’ limb signifies separation from the body, the same cannot be said for the mind in the same context. With a series of supported arguments he proves that while the body and the mind can have a connection and a relationship with each other, the body can be divided into many parts and the mind cannot. In Discussion and around this topic, Descartes is very prevalent in his opinion around the ultimate division of the body and mind. We will reference his philosophy around what it means to have two separate entities as humans.
Descartes’ theory about the mind and body states that the body is “always divisible” and the mind cannot be divided (Descartes). To support this argument he
…show more content…
The fact that we define the human body as having legs, arms, flesh, bones, organs, and a head is more than enough to agree that each of these, and more, are parts of what make up the body. We could even say that when a part of the body is separated, the body still remains a body for the fact that only a part of it was taken away. In fact in “The Philosophers Way”, Descartes’ ideas around a “non-material, immortal, conscious being” (Chaffee) is an ideal that set a precedent for philosophers to come. It is actually here that he ultimately found that this defines knowledge and self. “Cogito, ergo sum” or “I think, therefore I am” is a statement that defines Descartes’ views around the being self-aware and shining light around the fact that there is without a doubt a thinking, nonphysical entity that is the mind or consciousness. I believe that in this way he really highlights that it is not an organ like your brain that gives you knowledge, but rather your versatile mind that houses your soul and your

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the distinction that is also made by Descartes about humans only having souls is the ability for humans to be considered a thinking thing and there is nothing else that is able to think as humans can. Descartes states, “a substance whose whole essence or nature is simply to think. The soul that makes what I am”. Descartes refers back to the concept that the soul is what makes him what he is. The idea that the his whole purpose in life is to think, and the ability to think is the key concept that he believes makes a soul.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Locke’s essay idea is considered to be an object in which he uses for anything that a person’s sees or in which a person may be thinking of. He talks about qualities of being in one’s body in which the mind perceives on its own. Therefore quality is also a power that produces some idea in one’s mind. When he talks about “they are ideas or perception in our minds; and as they are modifications of matter in the bodies that cause such perception s in us” (E.24) keeping in mind that ideas or perception are internal operations in our minds that are perceived and reflected by ourselves. Therefore “modifications of matter” lack internal changes and are motions that our body does allowing one to perceive the object.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    COURSE -PERSPECTIVES OF KNOWLEDGE NAME - DIVYANSHU SHARMA ROLL NUMBER – 2013034 JOURNAL ON THE MIND BODY PROBLEM EMPHASISING ON DESCARTES Descartes believed that a person or human being such as you or me is a two-part composite, of a mind and a body or to put it simple a person is just the mind but has a body. And according to him, the mind is an entirely immaterial, nonphysical thing or simply a collection of information. What unites the mind with our body is that it causally interacts with the body. Descartes’ main arguments were these: One can doubt that their body or any other physical thing exists, One cannot doubt that their mind exists,The mind is distinct from the body. In this journal I will be focussing on the third…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When talking about dualism in Philosophy of mind we recognize is the theory that the mental and the physical are in sense different from one another. John Searle is an American philosopher who states that there is no more a mind and body problem. He is careful to maintain that the domain of experience and understanding is autonomous. Meaning that it has no counterpart on microlevel. But as we already know not everyone thinks in the same way, like Renè Descartes who believed that the mind makes an effort to take control over the brain and is the principal seat of the soul and place where all of our thought are being formed.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy sheds light on many themes, one of the issues philosophy contends is the understanding how mind and body are related. Rene Descartes, a father of philosophical ideology devised “The Argument from Introspection” to attempt to answer such question. The argument from introspection explains that the mind and body are two entirely separate states and therefore cannot be identical to one another. Descartes’ rationale behind the argument is that the body is separable because it can be physically transformed such as being split in half. The mind however is indivisible because in accordance to his stance, it is not a physical property.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, the mind and the body are autonomous substances, each ready to exist without the other. He gladly demonstrates this starting in the second meditation when he infers that we can be uncertain about the body but not about a reasoning personality since this is what is doing the questioning in the first place. Since we can doubt the body’s existence, and the mind can ‘question’ without a body, we are presented with duality between mind and body. He states, "there is a great difference between mind and body", because the body is divisible while the mind is not. I can, in my mind, divide extended things into parts, but "when I consider the mind, that is, myself insofar as I am only a thing that thinks, I cannot distinguish any parts in me; rather I take myself to be one distinct thing" (Meditation 6,…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Vs Hume

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    So, it is certain that I am really distinct from •my body and can exist without it"(Descartes, "Meditations on first philosophy"). In this argument, Descartes is using his doctrine of vivid and distinct ideas to separate the body and mind. In Descartes Principles of Philosophy, he states an idea as vivid when it is accessible to the mind and distinct when the idea is separate from all other ideas (Page 11). Because Descartes can think of both the mind and body is as distinct ideas, that is they exclude each other, he concludes they must be separate. Descartes second distinction between the mind and body lies in the varying nature of the two.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hume and Descartes: State of Existence Hume believes in an existence that is created through a physical existence that experiences the world through the human senses. These perceptions are then categorized into impressions and ideas which are then used to make sense of the world. Descartes, however, believes in a singular existence of a thinking thing, that is separate from a physical body, of which its existence he remains unsure of. In this essay, I will be analyzing Hume’s and Descartes’ beliefs in different states of existence as a thinking thing and a bundle of fleeting impressions and how it relates to their view of ideas. I reason that while there seem to be inconsistencies in both of their reasonings, I favor Hume’s claim that our existence…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes observes that the human body functions as physically divided appendages connected through a biological relationship (P.172-173). In addition, the human body dedicates specific organs to handle biological processes, while one mind handles all the facets of will and understanding (P.172). Since the human mind is immaterial however, it retains its complete form even if the material parts of the body are detached from one another (P.172). Since only the physical body operates as the unity of different organs, Descartes argues that the body should not be classified together with the mind. The argument for substance dualism is persuasive because it lays down clear differences that can be easily agreed upon provided that meditators use reason properly.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that this confirms his conclusion because he also gives a similar example. He says “the body by its very nature is always devisable, while the mind is utterly indivisible.” He then continues and gives an example of how if you were to cut off a limb, something has been taken away from the body, but nothing has been taken away from the mind, thus proving that the mind is indivisible. After reading his meditations and understanding his observations, I have come to agreement with Descartes’s conclusion that the mind and body are distinctly disconnected and that without the other each can…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics