Descartes 'Second Mediation'

Improved Essays
2nd Mediation Reading Response Recognizing the failings in comprehension is a key attribute in avoiding biases in the previous mediation, however it is easier said than done. To be faced on the growing continuum of indecision and intellectual liberation from the constant distractions brought by the senses Descartes resides in “pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge” as referring to the Twilight Zone. On the onslaught of uncertainty, the Wax analogy is sufficient enough when describing the complex nature of human minds from lower forms of intelligence. Wax’s nature under varying circumstances is the basic belief of contextual thought in relation to the world around us in proof we exist. Personally I believe Descartes has “I think,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. I am convinced by Descartes’ argument that the self is the most certain of objects. Because his logic and reasoning are good and well augmented, and he also gives the example of the wax experiment. The wax experiment shows that our senses don’t know anything and only the intellect knows the physical things. We know more about the mind than anything we know through the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will provide an analysis for one of the celebrated arguments by Descartes written in the Meditations. The challenging argument presented by Descartes is the argument from ignorance, which is precisely claimed in his First Meditation. Moreover, the skeptical argument requires for one to know that the present external world is not a dream in order to have knowledge that an external world exists. Otherwise, one does not really know that an external world exists. As noted, this argument of logical possibility presents difficulties when attempting to provide a satisfactory answer to avoid the questioning of the entailment of what one knows.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes can demonstrate the validity of his arguments, specifically through the use of the wax example, and ultimately has a larger framework of philosophical reasoning underlying his position than that of Montaigne. Further, Montaigne’s argument is weakened by his initial assumption that all knowledge comes from the senses. Descartes, by finding that the senses can be trusted, defeats this assumption as well as Montaigne’s…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title: Thinking things Vs. Physical things The novel, “Mediations on First Philosophy” written by Rene Descartes, is a man of suspicion which is why he questions things, and at times himself. He tries to seek the truth. In the text, Descartes assumed that thinking thing was the mind, whereas the physical things consisted only body, parts of the body, and the brain; in other words, they were different from each other.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final skeptical argument that Descartes offers is the argument from God’s omnipotent power (Class notes, Week 1). This argument is different from the first two arguments because it is calling into question God’s omnipotent power to deceive us into believing what is true is actually false. Descartes arrives to this argument because after the dream argument he admits that though he maybe dreaming, there are things in that world that remain consistent whether the senses were fooled or not. Those things are principles such as, algebra, geometry and arithmetic. He suggests that whether he is awake or sleep, two plus three will equal five.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes Ignorance

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Descartes way to achieve assurance was to initiate by doubting absolutely everything. The belief or principle or general truth would have to be impossible to doubt; its assurance would have to be eventual and not contingent upon any other belief, and it would have to indicate to something actually existing if the existence of other things in the world were to be concluded from it. Descartes examined his beliefs by groups or classes to observe if he could find one that was impossible to doubt. He began to examine those beliefs based on sense perceptions, deducing in the eventual that they were unreliable and therefore couldn't lead to certain knowledge . In regards to the wax example, the wax example exemplifies how knowledge cannot fundamentally…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Discussion and the Conclusion: In Meditation II, Descartes introduces the “Wax Analogy” in order to demonstrate conclusively that things are known through the intellect rather than the senses and that the mind is better known than the body. Specifically, the argument is concerned with how we know rather than what we know. The argument concentrates on transformation— that is, a piece of wax melting into liquid wax. Descartes states that our senses allow us to know about a piece of wax: its colour, taste, smell, size, shape, and solidity. When the wax is placed near a fire, it melts; thus, its properties change as well.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the wax example, Descartes not only shows that perceiving object is considered a node of thinking, but also represent that we can understand an idea through a pure understanding, which is mind rather than sensory experience. The wax significantly suggests that pure understanding is clearer than sensory experience (Descartes, 1996, p20-p21). In the other hand. Locke emphasizes that we understand ideas through primarily using reason which comes from our sensory experience (Locke, 2008, p19). The difference between the two explanations about obtaining true knowledge leads me to think that sensory experiences can be mistaken and as the result, they may cause different people to develop different interpretation on the same idea.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “Discourse on Method,” Descartes argues that the reason our conclusions vary in knowledge is that we do not have a systematic or methodical way of thinking. Therefore, in his essay he tries to provide such a method which could conduct our minds to achieve a complete and certain truth. Though, I wonder, how could one single person be able to come up with a method that could be used by everyone, and function for everyone in the same way. though Descartes was an intelligent philosopher, he could not have been able to concoct a method for everyone’s way of learning. Descartes’ argues that the way we think can vary depending on many reasons.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays