Descartes Proof Of God's Existence

Improved Essays
I detected so much apprehension from Descartes, but an overall willingness to reach truth. Descartes touched on many things that I didn’t thoroughly discuss. His prime intention was to reach a foundation that’s certain and through the proof of his existence, God’s existence, and the use of clear and distinct perception I can confidently say he’s reached a good level of certitude. His resolve regarding his existence and clear and distinct perception won me over. I couldn’t agree more. However, his proof of God’s existence is flawed in my opinion. I’m a believer in God and the proof he provided didn’t suffice for me. Although Descartes’s proof was not adequate, it did bring him to some truths, which is why I believe his overall resolve was successful.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Descartes prefers creating new concepts rather than building knowledge on old philosophies: “To reach certainty- to cast aside the loose earth and sand so as to come upon rock and clay”-He said. Descartes argues that, he needs to think and experience himself to confirm a scientific truth. To even establish a sturdier foundation and seek further knowledge, he looks for reasons to doubt his own opinion. If there is doubt about the basic principles of his opinions, he will doubt his other opinions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to prove the existence of God, Descartes comes to several conclusions which are essential to his argument. He firstly restates that everything he clearly and distinctly perceives is true and that God is not a deceiver as he is perfect and has no flaws, and, a deceiver, must have flaws. He says that we have an innate idea of God as an infinite being and that God must have the most infinite objective reality. Descartes also argues that since his existence “keeps going”, something must be maintaining…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first conclusion that he comes to is that due to the five premises, God had to have been the entity that placed the ideas of God into Descartes’ mind (157). Through the five premises, Descartes casts out the idea of his thoughts of God coming from inside of himself, and he is able to pin the cause to a higher power (God). In short, Descartes argues that he is a thinking thing with an idea of God that could not in any way originated from himself due to his imperfect nature. After determining that God must have been the entity to put the ideas into his mind, Descartes’ finalizes his argument with one last conclusion; God must exist (157). After determining that there was no other way that the ideas of God could have came from anywhere else but God himself, Descartes was able to come to the conclusion that God…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But if one defines walking as how one walks in a dream, or the thought of walking, then it is a thought, and therefore since it is a thought, they exist. Since Descartes found this certainty that one exists because they have the ability to think, he has just defeated skepticism and attained a piece of perfect…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes begins this argument with the confirmation that God exists. He suggests that God exists because…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes’s famous Cogito Ergo Sum (I think, therefore I am) faces a dilemma. The dilemma he faces is that his premise begs the question. Instead of building up to a conclusion that would prove his existence, he states “I think” to already assume he exists. Then he carries on saying “Therefore I am” to ultimately conclude he exists. Hence, his conclusion does not follow upon his premise.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I do not see why there are so many different ways of explaining the argument. I found it difficult to understand how in Descartes’s version of this argument is correct. How is “it is more perfect to exist than not to exist” even possible? I mean being here on this planet or in the world is fine but it is not perfect. But yet again he did make a valid point in the book.”…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The discussion on whether the idea of God is innate has been held among many philosophers. There are two philosophers, Rene Descartes and John Locke, who both have come up detailed explanation and understanding of the idea of God. Descartes believes that the idea of God is innate and inborn with a human mind. Yet Locke argues that the idea of God is not innate. Two philosophers’ opinions reach a disagreement.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Aristotelian science had taught that the fundamental units of being were substances, in which qualities or ‘accidents’ were lodged: thus, a cow is a substance, the redness of the cow an accident. Descartes abolished this distinction, holding, instead, that everything physical that exists is simply matter in space.” “Descartes believed that he could infallibly deduce another crucial principle: the existence of a good God, who guarantees the truth of my perceptions and so underwrites the existence of the world” (Kirsch 2016). At this point in time, Descartes believes that he is more modern than those he has succeeded. However, it can be predicted that when someone after him advances his research and or deems it something unworthy of acknowledgement, as did Gottlieb, due to more recent findings, Descartes would have the same kinds of emotions as John Donne and…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is obvious to him the idea of God could not have come from himself because God is perfect, and infinite, which Descartes is not nor has he ever experienced. Therefore; God is the ultimate cause of our idea of God, because Descartes could not have been the cause of the idea because he is not infinite and the idea of something can only come from something that truly is. Thus, God exists and is the cause of our idea of…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays