Descartes Perception Of Reality

Improved Essays
Reality is a complex thought exhibited within a singular dimension, the true world. Aldous Huxley once asserted, “there are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception. Perceptions are misconceptions, which elicit inaccurate understandings of the true world; thus they cannot be considered reality. While humans are capable of contemplating such misinterpretations, they must be false, as mankind itself is confined by a worldly boundary.
The idea of developing perceptions proves to only lead to untruthful projections of reality. The human ability to envisage such thoughts are the source behind this unreliability, since once stimuli is received humans begin to perceive. What is seen and heard may not always
…show more content…
Descartes affirms sensory information does not convey accurate or truthful information. Furthermore, Descartes discusses the relation between the state of dreaming and reception of stimuli. Through this perspective it is explained how deceptive dreams can be since he expresses how the same sensations and stimuli can be experienced both while awake and during sleep. In fact, just as Neo thought Morhpeus’s ideas to be deceptive, Descartes shows how deceptions from a greater outside source, in the film’s case, the real world, are not influential since one’s recognition of being deceived is sufficient to realize one’s existence; “I think, therefore I am”(Meditations of First Philosophy). On this premise Descartes explains this to be the reason why it is so difficult to differentiate a dream from being awake. Furthermore, Descartes explains since the senses can be deceived the senses and assumptions made under the justification of the senses. Some may argue since two worlds exist, as in the Matrix, humans could not possibly differentiate the perceptions conceived in each respective world. Yet, this opposition only supports Descartes’s views since Descartes himself explains how the same relationship is shared between the perceptions drawn while sleeping and being …show more content…
Mankind comes to truly understand reality of the world through every level of comprehension, much like how Neo comes to comprehend if the new reality is a deception, after being aware of the matrix’s deception. In the same manner Plato interprets true reality as a product of forms, the representations of what think, see, and know. In other words, forms are the copies of perfect objects. In contrast, Descartes explains how true reality is only guaranteed by the individuals themselves, capable of producing thoughts, God and God’s creations. According to Descartes, the senses alone are not sufficient to determine reality, instead there is a necessity for thought and comprehension by the human mind to arrive at a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What is prime reality – the really real? I was thinking ‘What is reality’? I decided to look up the definition. “Reality is the conjectured state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes says that when he is in a dream he can feel the heat of a fire even though the fire is not there. That feeling of warmth seems real even though he is asleep. Descartes senses deceive him which makes him question if his senses are always deceptive. In Conclusion, Descartes argues that one cannot prove we exist or are part of a concrete world.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes explores the nature of human perception through the mind as separated from the body. His meditations on the subject outline a number of principles regarding truth and understanding, but the Dream Argument for Skepticism is derived from a single principle. More specifically, Descartes explains that: "Accordingly, seeing that our senses sometimes deceive us, I was willing to suppose that there existed nothing really such as they presented to us; and because some men err in reasoning, and fall into paralogisms, even on the simplest matters of Geometry, I, convinced that I was as open to error as any other, rejected as false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for demonstrations; and finally, when I considered that the very same…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.0 Introduction “Well, dreams, they feel real while we’re in them, right? It’s only when we wake up then we realize that something was actually strange” (McCateer, 2010). Inception is a science-fiction movie, which was produced and directed by Christopher Nolan in 2010. ‘Inception’ as a concept refers to the situation when you plant an idea in someone’s mind without his or her knowledge of it happening (Rivera, 2012). The movie explores the ability to differentiate dreams from reality (Malcolm, 2010) and therefore looks at two branches of philosophy - metaphysics, and epistemology.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Barry Stroud and Elizabeth Wolgast provide different approaches to answer and understanding of the paradigm established in the argument. The context of the argument from ignorance that Descartes proposes is problematic when attempting to answer it . In Wolgast’s perspective, the argument from ignorance claims that the knowledge that one is not dreaming is a necessary condition to determine the existence of the external world. Under such circumstances, Wolgast claims that by considering ‘know’ as a necessary condition, then it becomes more difficult to provide evidence that will suffice the skeptic—…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I will explain Rene Descartes’ response from his Sixth Meditation to his dreaming argument from the First Meditation. Descartes’ Meditations are the processes of thinking that he attempted to create a stronger basis for our ways of thinking by doubting on various beliefs that are skeptical. In his Sixth Meditation, Descartes found an answer to his doubt and used that to refute his first premise of the dreaming argument. He knew that he could actually tell the different whether he was dreaming or not by matching the information he perceived and tracing it back to his memory. I will first introduce Descartes’ dreaming argument and then explain why the premises in his dreaming arguments are valid.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of this perception is one that can be rather difficult to comprehend, as Descartes himself was unable to clearly and distinctly define it; thus, we must first discuss the conception of the notion and delve deeper into the explanation of the theory. Firstly, Descartes arrived to the clear and distinct perception through his assertion that he exists and that he is a thinking thing. In the Third Meditation he resolves that his understanding of the cogito and the sum res cogitans are clear and distinct perceptions. Hence, he determines that all ‘natural light,’ or in other words, clear and distinct perceptions, must be true.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The effect of personal anecdotal evidence on confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is the common human tendency to notice or seek out information which confirms our already existing beliefs while ignoring evidence which conflicts our beliefs. It is particularly prevalent in cases where our beliefs are mere prejudice or based on superstition. Confirmation bias is the reason why many people believe in the supernatural such as ESP, lucky charms or the lunar effect: a claim that human behaviour is influenced by the position of the moon in its cycle. These kind of beliefs are usually backed up by evidence of personal experience.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Reality, a state of the world for what things truly are and as they truly exist. Reality has perplexed philosophers to an extent, but perhaps none more so than the maddening words of Descartes in his meditations. To say that his words are maddening is a bit ingenuous to Descartes, but what he does propose is out of place. There have been skeptics before Descartes, but the level of skepticism he reaches is quite absurd and even more, it would be absurd if it was even true and could not be refuted in any argument. To begin with Descartes’ evil genius, there will be two vital topics of discussion, doubt, and certainty.…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes, especially in his First Meditation, condemns the ability of sensation to provide information about the natural world and humans’ surroundings. Although he believes that humans must trust their senses to understand the obvious, he believes that not all perceptions can be trusted as bodily senses can be deceptive to internal understanding. However, a problem arises: how can one contemplate everything that is perceived around them as false? Certainly, unknown truths must reside in experiences not yet encountered especially those that require interactions with distant places and unfamiliar ideas. Descartes argues that these unfamiliarities are produced by pure introspection, but it can be argued that communication with a superior being allows humans to fully understand their supposed innate ideas.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler was a German art historian. In his 1916 essay on The Rise of Cubism he illustrates the struggles and failures on how the Cubist movement was developed, as well as the eventual success of the Cubists and why they achieved it. At the turn of the twentieth century many artists were experimenting because they were dissatisfied with the limitations of traditional methods of creating art. They tried all sorts of approaches, however a young Pablo Picasso, unlike the rest of them, chose a new direction, focusing only on the form of the object he was creating.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Matrix: Final There is an assurance that at one point in life, the end will come for each individual and everybody will perish at one point. For now, as humans and living things, we are all doing what we do best, exist. However, imagine if the life one believes to be a part of was not actual and in fact, it was all just a virtual concept in the mind. Having had watched the film, The Matrix, this paper analyzes comparisons between appearance and reality to the writings of Bertrand Russell’s, Problems of Philosophy. Thenceforward, René Descartes’, Meditations on First Philosophy are examined and the Method of Doubt is conveyed, carefully analyzing each of its stages.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Matrix, Plato, and Descartes question the reliability of perception and senses when discerning whether reality is true or not. In addition, they The Matrix is the story of the human race lying unconscious in machines while their brains are connected to a computer in which creates a virtual reality (The Matrix, 1999). In Plato’s allegory of the cave, Plato asks Glaucon to imagine that humans are chained to a wall, and if freed would they know the difference between reality and the shadows on the wall (Plato, n.d.). Descartes (1641) doubted that his senses could be trusted, and questioned if his life was a dream.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Something which can be difficult to distinguish when reading the Meditations is whether Descartes is talking about truth in its purest sense or reality. In the second meditation, he argues that when looking to establish truth we need to accept that we exist otherwise we cannot judge the truth in anything else. But this can be confusing as he is relating truth and reality and equalling them to each other. If Descartes here, is referring to the idea of reality he is arguing that for us to judge the reality of anything else, we must admit that through our ability to think for ourselves and rationalise, we must be real. However, if he is referring to truth, then he is using the truth of our own thoughts to rationalise the truth of all else.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays