Descartes Perception Of Reality

Improved Essays
Reality is a complex thought exhibited within a singular dimension, the true world. Aldous Huxley once asserted, “there are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception. Perceptions are misconceptions, which elicit inaccurate understandings of the true world; thus they cannot be considered reality. While humans are capable of contemplating such misinterpretations, they must be false, as mankind itself is confined by a worldly boundary.
The idea of developing perceptions proves to only lead to untruthful projections of reality. The human ability to envisage such thoughts are the source behind this unreliability, since once stimuli is received humans begin to perceive. What is seen and heard may not always
…show more content…
Descartes affirms sensory information does not convey accurate or truthful information. Furthermore, Descartes discusses the relation between the state of dreaming and reception of stimuli. Through this perspective it is explained how deceptive dreams can be since he expresses how the same sensations and stimuli can be experienced both while awake and during sleep. In fact, just as Neo thought Morhpeus’s ideas to be deceptive, Descartes shows how deceptions from a greater outside source, in the film’s case, the real world, are not influential since one’s recognition of being deceived is sufficient to realize one’s existence; “I think, therefore I am”(Meditations of First Philosophy). On this premise Descartes explains this to be the reason why it is so difficult to differentiate a dream from being awake. Furthermore, Descartes explains since the senses can be deceived the senses and assumptions made under the justification of the senses. Some may argue since two worlds exist, as in the Matrix, humans could not possibly differentiate the perceptions conceived in each respective world. Yet, this opposition only supports Descartes’s views since Descartes himself explains how the same relationship is shared between the perceptions drawn while sleeping and being …show more content…
Mankind comes to truly understand reality of the world through every level of comprehension, much like how Neo comes to comprehend if the new reality is a deception, after being aware of the matrix’s deception. In the same manner Plato interprets true reality as a product of forms, the representations of what think, see, and know. In other words, forms are the copies of perfect objects. In contrast, Descartes explains how true reality is only guaranteed by the individuals themselves, capable of producing thoughts, God and God’s creations. According to Descartes, the senses alone are not sufficient to determine reality, instead there is a necessity for thought and comprehension by the human mind to arrive at a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To attack a piece of accepted knowledge is bold to say the least, and here Descartes’ focus is to better justify how one can credibly dispute anything. The idea of cutting an idea by the roots, as the tree metaphor is prominent, is new but also the way that is most effective in differentiating from the reality of life. Descartes poses the idea that as much as one can fool themselves to believe they are not dreaming, it is never certain whether we are in a physical conscious state. This idea is rather perplexing as, when looked deeper into, holds no faults. It can be said that any physical senses are not present in the dream state, but it is not necessarily true to everyone.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dream Argument Descartes

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1 Knowledge of the outside world is something we can only attain through our senses. Unfortunately, we can easily fall for illusions. Descartes explains in his First Meditation that he cannot trust his senses to obtain knowledge of the external world because they have deceived him before ( Descartes, 1 ). The major deception of the senses is dreaming. So dreams falter the true knowledge we obtain through our senses.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The effect of personal anecdotal evidence on confirmation bias. Confirmation bias is the common human tendency to notice or seek out information which confirms our already existing beliefs while ignoring evidence which conflicts our beliefs. It is particularly prevalent in cases where our beliefs are mere prejudice or based on superstition. Confirmation bias is the reason why many people believe in the supernatural such as ESP, lucky charms or the lunar effect: a claim that human behaviour is influenced by the position of the moon in its cycle. These kind of beliefs are usually backed up by evidence of personal experience.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Deceit

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rene Descartes is throwing away everything that he knows away. Shapes, air, the earth, color, sounds and all the external things are nothing but things in his dream. He will question himself as not having hands, or eyes, or flesh, or blood, or any senses, but only believe that he was believing in lies. Rene Descartes comes to a conclusion that he will take over what the evil genius had taken away from him. “If it is not within my power to know anything true, it certainly is within my power to take care resolutely to withhold my assent to what is false, lest this deceiver, however powerful, however clever he may be, have any effect on me.”…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead he argues that there is a possibility for them to be false. Therefore, they are questionable. Along with the senses possibility of being deceptive, our sensory perceptions can be deceptive in a way that we could all be in a never ending dream. Descartes concluded that there is no way to distinguish between sensory perceptions in and out of a dream, it is possible for use to be in a dream twenty for seven. Lastly, Descartes beings into doubt our belief of a priori knowledge because he suggests that it could be the case that God is an evil genius that deceives us.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first being that you cannot trust authorities as they disagree amongst themselves and have differing theories and ideas and therefore they cannot be passing on certain truths as they would agree if that was the case. The mistrust of the senses is the basis of what will become Descartes’ dreaming argument, this is the idea that you cannot at any time trust your senses as they deceive us regularly in the form of things that are far away or too close being easily misinterpreted (Feinberg and Shafer-Landau, 2015). From this Descartes introduces his dreaming argument.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler was a German art historian. In his 1916 essay on The Rise of Cubism he illustrates the struggles and failures on how the Cubist movement was developed, as well as the eventual success of the Cubists and why they achieved it. At the turn of the twentieth century many artists were experimenting because they were dissatisfied with the limitations of traditional methods of creating art. They tried all sorts of approaches, however a young Pablo Picasso, unlike the rest of them, chose a new direction, focusing only on the form of the object he was creating.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.0 Introduction “Well, dreams, they feel real while we’re in them, right? It’s only when we wake up then we realize that something was actually strange” (McCateer, 2010). Inception is a science-fiction movie, which was produced and directed by Christopher Nolan in 2010. ‘Inception’ as a concept refers to the situation when you plant an idea in someone’s mind without his or her knowledge of it happening (Rivera, 2012). The movie explores the ability to differentiate dreams from reality (Malcolm, 2010) and therefore looks at two branches of philosophy - metaphysics, and epistemology.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is prime reality – the really real? I was thinking ‘What is reality’? I decided to look up the definition. “Reality is the conjectured state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes states that because of this we must break down everything we know and find a base to our knowledge, an unquestionable principal. He continues on to say that because of this we should not trust anything that has previously deceived us and consider what we hold to be true by this. Descartes says that there are many ways that our senses that provide impressions, as Hume would put it, will deceive us. For example, because man has the ability to dream while a sleep, how is that we know we are awake this very second. The same goes for our sight; from far away we may think there is water in the distance on a very hot day but as we get closer we realize that our visual sense have mislead us.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, upon a closer and more rigorous examination, it is revealed that this argument is not as unsubstantiated as it seems to be. In order to understand how Descartes justifies his assertion, the concept of “clear and distinct idea” needs to be understood. Descartes’ “clear and distinct idea” involves the argument that an idea becomes clear when sharp intellectual perception is applied to it, similar to how a physical object becomes visually clear when sharp visual perception is applied to the physical object. Furthermore, the idea is distinct if it is not only clear but also excludes all other ideas that does not belong to it (Skirry). Thus, Descartes argued that the body is distinct from the mind because, after applying acute intellectual perception, Descartes perceived that the idea of the mind excludes the idea of body and the idea of the body excludes the idea of the mind therefore the mind is separate and different from the body (Skirry).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays