Descartes Meditation

Decent Essays
In Descartes’ Meditation II. ¶ 1­3 Descartes concludes, "'I am, I exist' is necessarily true whenever it is put forward by me or conceived in my mind." Descartes reaches this conclusion by first asserting that his method of doubt so far has left him doubting his senses. He intends on further using his method of doubt to, like Archimedes, discover at least one thing that is certain, even if this one thing is that nothing is certain. Descartes reasons that his sensory concept of an object cannot be trusted, so there must be another source ­­ God, malignant demon, or Descartes himself ­­ of his perception of an object. For, if he rejects his possession of both senses and body, and simultaneously claims existence is defined by body and senses,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Meditations takes us on an intellectual, meditative, spiritual journey inward, questioning what exactly, if anything at all, we can know with certainty. Descartes was active in physics and mathematics, as he was interested in the potential of science to give us the truth about the world. Descartes believed that knowledge has secure foundations and and that all other knowledge rests upon these foundations. Hence, in order to establish what is “firm and constant in the sciences”, it is necessary to establish the very foundations of all knowledge so that he could use these principles to base the reasoning process upon. For Descartes, this meant removing all sensory prejudice.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will then proceed to analyze the third meditation in which Descartes focuses on a causal argument for existence of God who is perfect. By the end of the third meditation, Descartes appears to prove that he is not God and that God exists. Descartes knows that he exists by the very fact of “cogito”. He cannot doubt that he exists because something cannot doubt or have awareness and not exist.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His initial premise, doubting reality, follows the process of thinking regarding the mind's perception of its environment. The body and mind are separate in Descartes' understanding. Though they work in tandem, human experience is dependent on the mind. The body is merely a vessel for the mind, and its senses cannot be trusted to determine reality. The mind, then, is what must be examined to determine the scope of reality.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of Descartes’ argument of doubt is to encourage us to doubt the truth in everything. Some would argue that the doubt argument is not valid because its conclusion does not follow its premises. While this is a strong observation, it overlooks the three arguments Descartes’ used to strengthen his premise on doubt - perceptual illusion, the dream problem, and a deceiving god. In the first case, perceptual illusion illustrates that things are not always just as they seem and since we cannot all be sure about what is true and what is not, it is our best interest to doubt any sensory knowledge. The dream problem claims that it is possible to doubt any physical thing actually exists and that there is an external world.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says in the first meditation he is doubtful about all the things he thinks he knows, and in the second meditation he states that he believes he exists when he thinks he exists. Descartes concluded that whatever he truly believes in clearly and distinctly therefore then must be…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his Meditations on First Philosophy, Rene Descartes proposes the argument: “Nothing further now remains but to inquire whether material things exist. And certainly I at least know that these may exist insofar as they are considered as the objects of pure mathematics, since in this aspect I perceive them clearly and distinctly” (451) Essentially Descartes is putting forth the assertion that only the mathematical characteristics of objects can be clearly and distinctly perceived as being manifest of the true nature of them.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Descartes struggled with a problem that is now called “the problem of knowing,” and sometimes referred to as the “brain in a vat” dilemma. The idea is that the brain is easy to fool. The only way a person knows what he experiences of reality is the truth is by trusting in the sensory inputs of his own brain. The answer Descartes came up with for this dilemma was, “I think, therefore I am,” which means that thinking is the one thing he knew could not be artificed. Even if thinking comes from a different place than what is expected, the thoughts still come from the individual and define the individual as real, regardless of any other…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    René Descartes is one of the most famous modern philosophers in the world. One of his most reputable works is called Meditations on the First Philosophy. The book is made up of six mediations in which Descartes seeks to prove what knowledge is undoubtedly true. In his third meditation, Descartes attempts to provide evidence for the existence of God. He raises one main argument, followed by a supplemental argument.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    It can also be cognizant of bodily things, such as seeing, hearing, and feeling. Although he can do all of these things, Descartes decides they are only true when he is awake, and false when he is asleep. Sensing and thinking are one and the same. He finds it odd that bodily things are more distinctly known than the “I”, even though he knows he exists. Descartes realizes what is happening, and lets his mind “wander” and doesn’t confine it to limits.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He cannot without doubt claim to fully understand the nature of existence, when he cannot remember what the state of not existing is akin to. Existence cannot be extended as a necessary quality to god in the manner that the interior sum of the angles of a triangle must sum to 180…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes “Evil Deceiver” argument he argues that an evil demon is the source of our deception rather than an omnipotent God. The strongest argument that Descartes presents is the idea that our senses cannot be trusted as the world around us and everything we experience is a constructed illusion. In this paper, I will argue that this argument can be seen as sound as our senses can not be trusted because they are unreliable. In “Meditation I: What Can be Called Into Doubt” Descartes explains to us that the information we are receiving through our senses isn’t inherently accurate.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes associates as an Early Modern Thinker as he obtains opposing views from the Medieval Period. Descartes believes that the Medieval Period thinkers suffer corruption because of their theocentric views and negligence regarding advancing knowledge, as the medieval thinkers practice exegesis. Descartes concludes that an intellectual revolution is necessary in order to completely break with the corrupt past in order to gain new knowledge and truths. In order to achieve new truths and most certain knowledge, Descartes yearns for indubitably, the inability to doubt claims.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays