Descartes Meditation Iii Essay

1291 Words 6 Pages
In the "Mediations of First Philosophy" Descartes tries to prove the existence of God in the third meditation. He does this by coming up with several premises that eventually add up to a solid argument. First, I will explain why Descartes ask the question, does god exist? And why does Descartes think he needs such and argument at this point in the text. Secondly, I will explain, in detail, the arguments that Descartes makes and how he comes to the conclusion that God does exist. Next, I will debate some of Descartes premises that make his argument an unsound one, including circular reasoning. Finally, I will see if his unsound argument has diminished and undermined his principal goals and the incorrigible foundation of knowledge. In …show more content…
This is Descartes first premise. His second premise is the "Causal Adequacy Principle." The principle says that if there is an item A having the property of B, then whatever causes A must have at least as much B as does A. Descartes gives an example of a stone, stating that the stone can't be made by anything that doesn't contain everything found in a stone. Basically the premise is based on a more general one that, it is not possible for something to come from nothing. Descartes then applies the Causal Adequacy Principal to ideas. Descartes claims that just in the case of how objects must contain at least as much reality as what created it ,then the cause of an idea must contain at least as much reality as the idea itself. So if an idea I represents some object O as having property P then the cause of I must have as much F as O is represented as having. Descartes puts these premises together and arrives at the fact that God exists in the following way. Since my idea of God represents God has being infinite and perfect whatever causes this idea must be infinite and perfect as well. Descartes then realizes that he cannot be the cause of his idea, of God, because he is not perfect or infinite. The definition of God as being "the perfect being" shows that the only thing that can cause this idea of the perfect being

Related Documents