Descartes Existence Of God

Superior Essays
I think that if 'cogito ergo sum ' is the foundation of Descartes ' project in the Meditations, the existence of God is the cornerstone that joins the internal and the external world, making knowledge possible beyond the sole account of the self. Therefore, God 's existence has a major role in the overall argument - it is that which enables the thinker to take the first steps towards the 'unification of sciences '. However, in my opinion, it is not employed correctly, as Descartes, in reasoning for it, relies on rather unsound arguments. I will next present Descartes ' overall argument and how the proof of God 's existence interlocks with the other points of the argument. Then I will introduce the causal and ontological arguments. Thereafter, …show more content…
Being aware that he exists in the form of a 'thinking thing ', capable, through the clear and distinct perceptions, of envisaging glimpses of sound knowledge (only to lose them when his attention wanders), the Meditator employs those perceptions into an articulate one-piece argument. Thus, he inspects the collection of clearly and distinctly perceivable ideas he possesses to find the idea of a 'infinite substance, which is independent, supremely intelligent and supremely powerful ' and by which everything was created - God (idem, p. 38). This idea, he argues, must derive from a cause with the same ( 'formally ', in Descartes ' terms) or greater intension( 'eminently '). If the effect has any properties that its cause does not incorporate, then the additional data comes from nowhere - was created from nothing. This would be absurd. Hence an infinite, supremely intelligent and powerful, perfect cause must exist. This cause is also extrinsic to the Meditator - he cannot be the cause of this idea of perfection, for he is a limited, imperfect being. It follows that the idea of God is an innate idea which has been implanted during the creational process by God himself, like 'the artisan 's trademark imprinted on his work ' - hence 'the trademark argument ' name. Before concluding the Third Meditation Descartes puts forward a slightly different, briefer …show more content…
John Cottingham, in his book Descartes, affirms that "The problem is given special piquancy by Descartes ' own statement (...) that 'the certainty and truth of all knowledge depends on my knowledge of the true God ' ". This suggests that the knowledge of God should be axiomatic - but it isn 't. Although all the knowledge depends on the knowledge of true God, Descartes ' does not have, at the starting point, any knowledge of God. He shouldn 't be able to give forth any certain and truthful judgment, yet he claims to do so. Apparently, Descartes employs 'clear and distinct ideas ' in demonstrating that God exists (when he perceives clearly and distinctly that 'existence ' is an essential attribute of God or when he puts forth the causal principle) and then justifies the truthfulness of the clear and distinct ideas by the existence of God. This contradiction is, however, falsified by Descartes himself: 'When I said that we can know nothing for certain until we are aware that God exists, I expressly declared that I was speaking only of knowledge of those conclusion which can be recalled when we are no longer attending to the argument by means of which we deduced them '(cited from John Cottingham: p.66). Descartes ' reasoning is fair, as it dismantles the charge of circularity. Nevertheless, it depends on the acceptance of the 'clear and distinct ' perception of ideas as a valid epistemological tool.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, I will summarize the background of the Second Meditation that Descartes uses to explain his claim. Second, I will express my opinions concerning why Descartes’ argument is convincing. Third, I will make known an objection to Descartes’ claim, and then argue why is it incorrect. Descartes begins his Second Meditation by saying yesterday’s meditation, which is the First Meditation, has left him doubting his beliefs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To build his argument, Descartes begins by working with the premise of there being a God: “Clearly the idea of God, that is, the idea of a supremely perfect being, is one I discover to be no less within me than the idea of any figure or number. And that it belongs to God’s nature that he always exists is something I understand no less clearly and distinctly than is the case when I demonstrate in regard to some figure or number that something also belongs to the nature of that figure or number.” (Descartes, 59). In this quote, Descartes outlines why he believes that there is a God. The rationality he employs is based upon understanding the concept of God as being supremely perfect.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Mediation III”, Descartes establishes that the idea of clear and distinct perception rest on the foundation of a perfect God. Yet, Descartes proof of God appears to be grounded in the the idea that we clearly perceive this supreme being. His appeal to the “natural light of reason” isn 't any different than us perceiving clearly and distinctly. Descartes is relying on his reliability of perception of God in his attempt to prove that God exists. This circular reasoning is what is known as the “Cartesian Circle.”…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says that the idea of God is not invented nor adventitious but rather innate. It does not come from the senses but rather is a “trademark” that God places in us. We have an idea of God as an infinite and perfect being and something finite could not possibly create the idea of something infinite. Thus, Descartes, a finite being, cannot invent the idea of God. “For although the idea of a substance is in me by virtue of the fact that I am a substance… unless this idea proceeded from some substance which was really infinite”. p76.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The focus of this paper is the Cartesian Circle. There seems to be a circularity in Descartes’ argument regarding the claims of the existence of God. There are philosophers who claim Descartes commits to a belief that has no foundation and because his argument is circular it holds no weight. There are also philosophers who defend Descartes and claim that he does not commit himself to a foundationless belief and that what seems circular isn’t actually circular. I will be supporting the latter argument and I will show that Descartes doesn’t consign to a circular argument but rather gives an argument that both supports his claim about God and shows how his base belief is a solid foundation for other beliefs to be built upon.…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will argue that Descartes, using his own criteria for making and avoiding mistakes, cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God in meditation three in his Meditations on First Philosophy. I will develop my argument in two parts. First, I will present Descartes’s argument for how mistakes are made and avoided.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the third Meditation, René Descartes aims to offer an argument for the existence of God, based simply on what he knows with certainty. In this, he reviews his doubts, what he knows for certain, and what he no longer doubts. While arguing the existence of God, Descartes explores God as a possible deceiver, his capacity to overcome this doubt in God’s goodness through formal and objective realities, and how effects supremely rely on their ultimate cause. Through his various claims and objections, Descartes establishes a relationship between a finite idea or event and its infinite cause to prove that God is a perfect being by himself that placed innate ideas of his existence in our thoughts. Before he begins his argument for the existence…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second part of this argument focuses on the definition of God but is perceived so clearly and distinctly. The idea of God is of a supremely perfect being. A supremely perfect being has all perfections. Existence is a predicate of a perfect being, therefore, God must exist to avoid being self-contradictory. Therefore, God exists.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, in this essay, I will be looking into the process of two philosopher’s arguments and comparing them. In addition, I will reveal that Locke’s argument against Innateness of the idea of God could be questionable based on his theory of obtaining true knowledge and idea. Rene Descartes asserts the principle of innate idea in the one of his philosophical treatise named “Meditations on First…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Third Meditations Descartes formulates the idea of God in order for him to gain a better knowledge of the world around him, and for us to ponder the thought of the all powerful god. Descartes believes that God has left our lives up to us but has created a path for us to follow, that will allow us to “achieve understanding of the fundamental principals of the entire physical universe.” (Cottingham, 48). This idea is known as the ‘Trademark Argument’, because it revolves around the idea that God has placed the idea of himself within…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays