Analysis Of Descartes Meditations

Improved Essays
Descartes seeks to explain the existence of God in his meditations. The first instance that he is seen trying to explain the existence of God is in his first meditation which is emphasized in the firth mediation. Descartes argues that the there is a source for ideas in the first meditation and in the firth meditation, he seeks to enhance his first meditation by digging deeper. Although he proposes and defines his arguments, many philosophers have argued that
Descartes’ arguments are baseless and they are merely founded on plain suspecting criteria that there is a god in the human beings where he does not provide the relevant explanations
(Gorham 370-372). Descartes further seeks to explain why the human beings are subject to error despite being created
…show more content…
YourLastName 2
In the third meditation, Descartes comes up with the argument that there is something behind the ideas of human beings him included in this category. He states that there must be some reason humans have the ideas they have and there must be a reason they have the ideas they have. In this case, an idea according to Descartes is sourced from somewhere and there must be someone who places the ideas in the humans. He explains that a god in him makes him have the idea of a god and in that this causes him to do things. Even if he can cause things to happen or cause ideas himself, he explains that this is a manifestation of a certain god him causing him to express all those ideas (Davies 58-59). Descartes explains that there is no natural cause of ideas but a certain god that causes them. In tending to explain the force or the power that God has on human beings, he explains that the way things exists is an idea and they were meant to be so. This therefore means that there was an idea behind their existence and this idea is that god wanted them to be so. The principle of an infinite god is explained in this meditation in that Descartes explains that a god is somewhere and is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The premises of his argument explicitly draw upon the questions. Moreover, even if there is a supreme being that exists, how can it be proved that he gave us these faculties of will and intellect or that he has any interaction with us or cares about us whatsoever? His argument for God as a reason to believe all that one perceives is truth is more of a statement go faith than it is logic. Proving God’s existence is significant to the meditations because it is the only way to bring back the outside world, outside of the mind. For me, the only veridical foundation Descartes intellectual project finds is that…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will then proceed to analyze the third meditation in which Descartes focuses on a causal argument for existence of God who is perfect. By the end of the third meditation, Descartes appears to prove that he is not God and that God exists. Descartes knows that he exists by the very fact of “cogito”. He cannot doubt that he exists because something cannot doubt or have awareness and not exist.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    We will begin by analyzing the Meditations by Descartes that he makes and what they mean. We will look at the many of the themes that are present in his meditations. We will then move onto looking at the dialogue between Ponens, Nous, and Tollens. We will express their objections to the Meditations. Finally we will conclude with the argument that is most convincing.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, I will summarize the background of the Second Meditation that Descartes uses to explain his claim. Second, I will express my opinions concerning why Descartes’ argument is convincing. Third, I will make known an objection to Descartes’ claim, and then argue why is it incorrect. Descartes begins his Second Meditation by saying yesterday’s meditation, which is the First Meditation, has left him doubting his beliefs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, I will present Descartes’s first proof for the existence of God in the third meditation, and in the process present the steps clearly and distinctly, exactly as Descartes understands them. Thus, Descartes cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God. Descartes argument for making mistakes in his third meditation in Meditation on First Philosophy is that human beings can make errors, even though God gave them perfect faculties. These mistakes are caused by our own will or free choice, which has a much broader scope…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosopher René Descartes expresses his belief that he has proven the existence of God beginning in Meditation III. By this time in his meditations, Descartes has concluded that the only thing he can be sure of is that he exists and is a thinking thing. Through this thinking, he concludes that he knows nothing for certain. Descartes begins considering the existence of God by examining the contents of his mind. It is through his innate idea of God that Descartes concludes that God exists, and through God’s existence his understanding of the material world as a whole is concluded.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Meditation One” Descartes establishes that his…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Causality is the structure of cause and effect, the relationship completely. For A must come before B, A being the cause and B the effect. This is one of the necessary conditions that need to be met, for causation to be applicable. At least three, need to be met altogether, such as temporal priority over cause and effect, and continuity. These conditions also have to happen at the same time, or it is not credible.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays