Comparing Descartes And Leibniz: Relationship Between Mind And Body

Great Essays
Question 1.
Choosing between Descartes and Leibniz’s understanding of the relationship between mind and body, I would say that Leibniz offers a more satisfying theory of the mind and body interaction than Descartes. Let me explain why by understand Leibniz’s and Descartes view on mind and body.
Descartes came up with a concept called Dualism of the mind and body, where he believed that there are two distinct substances; 1) matter of which the essential property fits together extended in space (like body, chairs, and rocks). 2) the mind or immaterial, of which the essential property is that it ‘thinks’ (like thoughts and ideas) which take no physical space – these are things that our mind is made up of. The nature of the mind a thinking non-extended
…show more content…
Let me explain why by understanding Locke’s and Hume’s view of personal identity, based on a personal experience.
In 2006, while driving, I had a severe automobile accident on Highway 71 southbound, driving 70 miles per hour, my vehicle flipped over several times (I am told my vehicle flipped over 8 times by my mother and son who was in the vehicle with me). Finally coming to a halt after sliding upside down on the highway were I lost consciousness and I was pronounced dead on the scene – but I still live today. I cannot recall my past self. I am one with two beginnings, an exception to the rule – no doubt.
Locke would argue that I am not the same person because my conscious or thinking cannot recall my past memories. I have no psychological continuity. Because your consciousness determines your personal identity, according to Locke, not your body or personality. Has my identity changed? I say no, I am still the same person even though I cannot recall my past memories due to an accident that broke the continuity of my consciousness. Do I in-fact have two beginnings or do my past and present self share one beginning. Even more so, old age can be the cause of my consciousness or thinking – once again breaking my psychological continuity – not being able to recall my past and often present memories. Therefore, personal identity goes were the consciousness goes, according
…show more content…
Locke does not believe memory extends beyond personal identity. Meaning, at the ripe old age of 67, Hume would agree that you can recall your younger self at the age of two years old even if you have no specific memory of being two years old – but Locke does not permit or agree. I do not agree with Locke in that I am not the same person because my conscious or thinking cannot recall my past memories. Therefore, I find Hume’s idea of personal identity more convincing in that the origin of the self is experiences with others and by having a number of experiences the mind forms the idea of necessary

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Christian Park Assignment #6 In this paper, I will define two concepts of personal identity, one being the Ego Theory, and the other being the Bundle Theory. By presenting examples of teletransportation and split-brain patients, I will show that the Bundle Theory is more plausible, which indicates that our natural beliefs of personal identity are false and inconclusive. According to the Ego Theory, a person existing over time is explained by a continued existence of a subject of experiences. The consciousness of a person is unified at any moment of time because there there is only one person having many experiences at that moment.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The subject of philosophy is a study that can be viewed in many different ways. Some ways vary in extremes from one another, but they all wish to pursue the same thing; the understanding of knowledge and human excellence. One of the most popular arguments is the comparison of mind and body. Through this paper I will go in depth on the individuals theories and discoveries, then compare them using the ideas from Plato’s Phaedo and Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. Both philosophers share the same ideas on dualism, and believe the body to be inferior to the mind and/or soul.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although this is a common belief, it comes with many problems. One of the most concerning issues is the problem of circularity. It is important to first note that, in the words of Schechtman, “The circularity objection itself relies on a claim that memory, by definition, presupposes personal identity,” (Schechtman, Pg. 42). This means that the initial assumption with this concept is that memory and personal identity have an interconnected relationship that cannot be undone. If we look at an individual’s memories, we can see how they indicate personal identity.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’s Cogito is the argument which he stopped the doubting process. The reason behind this was one belief he attempted to doubt was not true, the belief of his own existence. Descartes’s mind/body dualism viewed the mind and body as two separate entities of each other.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will try to prove that Locke has a clearer more logistical idea than Chisholm. John Locke says that personal identity is a matter of psychological continuity. Chisholm says that the identity of a person is a perfect identity wherever it…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Perry’s A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality, Perry discusses both the possibility of immortality (the ability to survive after death) and the question of personal identity. In the process, he proposes three theories as to what could account for personal identity: soul theory, memory theory, and body theory. First, however, it is necessary to discuss what the question of personal identity is. Personal identity refers to a human being’s numerical identity over time. Thus, the question of personal identity essentially asks what must be preserved in order for a person to be considered the same, or continuous, over time.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume Paper David Hume presents two important theories on moral responsibility and personal identity. In his theory of moral responsibility, he states that sometimes people are responsible for their actions and sometimes they are not; it depends if their actions are caused by a person’s character. In his theory of personal identity, he argues that the idea of self does not persist over time, therefore someone cannot be held responsible for their past actions since they are always changing. While these theories may look like they are incompatible, they are compatible.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Identity Concept

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, other theories come into play and reject the psychological approach to explaining personal identity and it’s persistence over time; claims that continuity of the brain and memory are not enough to explain and confirm personal identity are made. These theories include the biological approach, the dualist theory, and the materialist theory. Through the review of these theories respectively, a clearer understanding of personal identity can be developed and argued for. Following this, we can begin to see how cases of multiples personalities or identities can be argued to exist as…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes proposes a variant of substance dualism that maintains the equal and distinct existence of physical and mental substances. Descartes (1641) discusses that bodies are physical substances because they extend outward and occupy spatial regions while the human mind is a mental substance because it cannot extend through space (P.165). Descartes also notes fundamental differences on their activities; the human body is passive because it cannot think while the mind can handle complex mental processes and actively conjure original ideas (P.166). Despite the differences, the separation is still functional because the two substances connect in a strong relationship to account for causal interactions (P.168). As a result, under the assumption that the human body and the human…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is argued by Descartes’s that the mind body interaction does interact on a daily basis, on the other hand Leibniz disagrees, and they are causally interacting with each other. You will learn how the mind body is linked and how the body reacts to physically movement from the reasoning/thinking of the mind. It is a dualism, it have metaphysical between both substances. Mind is mental, Body is physical. The mind is not a physical thing it works in the mental state while the Body is the physical part, and they both do depend on each other.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes thinks that the mind is better known than the body. However I do not believe that is accurate, I believe this because Descartes seems to make a mistake in regards to how the mind and the body are perceived. He thinks that they are distinctly different, and that the mind is better known. This is a false assumption that will be explored throughout the duration of this paper. Descartes famously defended the Cartesian dualist view.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But your emotional thoughts and identity are a whole different story. Philosophers with Hume’s belief of only sense data existing in the mind is based from Berkeley’s philosophical views. Berkeley was an immaterialist. He believed that physical objects are just a group of different perceptions. Before we dive into Hume’s ideas on personal identity we should take a closer look at Berkeley.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the first to try to develop a theory of philosophy of mind, and he especially focused on personal identity. Hume believed that self was just a fiction that we have created to describe our impression and perception (526). In order to make it more clear, we have to go Hume’s problem of induction. Hume focuses in on cause and effect in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. He succinctly states “…That causes and effect are discoverable, not by reason but by experience…”(543).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays