This study used the Independent and Dependent Variable Model. Independent variable is the principal profile such as age, gender, teaching experience/s, position, length of experience as principals, number of teachers being supervise and enrolment of the school assignment. Whereas, in dependent variable is the instructional management of principal in relation to teachers and pupils performance.
Peter Drucker’s Management by Objectives (MBO) employed in this study. He was one of the most known authors in the field of management is and consider him as “Father of Modern Management”. He stresses out that management deals with management and application and controls on results. Consequently, Management is a humanistic activity by dealing with people, their values, success and development. Ivan Tasic et al …show more content…
Framing the school goals;
4.2 Communicating school goals
4.3 Supervising and evaluating instruction;
4.4 Coordinating the Curriculum
4.5 Monitoring pupils’ progress;
4.6 Protecting instructional time
4.7 Maintaining high visibility
4.8 Providing incentives for teachers;
4.9 Promoting professional development
4.10 Providing incentives for learning
5. Is there a significant difference between teachers and principals assessment of the instructional management of the latter?
6. Is there a significant difference between teachers and principal assessment of the instructional management based from the 10 areas of Hallinger instructional management?
7. What relationship exist between instructional management of school principal and
7.1 Teachers Performance?
7.2 Pupils Performance?
7.3 Profile of Principals
Hypothesis
There is no significant difference among the instructional management of elementary school principals to the teachers and pupils performance?
Operational Definitions of Variables
Domain of Instructional Leadership There are 10 domains specified in the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale developed by Philip Hallinger and