It was a great pleasure reading each of the postings that I commented on. Overall, 71% of students analyzed their articles from a teleological perspective while 29% analyzed articles from a deontological school of thought.
The first student analyzed a Supreme Court decision that was rejected by the court. The case involved five residents who took their case to the Supreme Court because they want to carry a concealed weapon in public. This article was analyzed from a teleological school of thought because the court rejected the case because the less guns citizen has; the more likely that society will be safe. From a deontological school of thought, this case may not have been rejected because it would have been focus on the morals and values …show more content…
The bill going to removed Department of Childre, Youth, and Families (DCYS) under the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). The reason is that they are trying to provide effective services to those who need the services. This article was analyzed from both teleological and deontological school of thought.
The fifth student analyzed an article where a police officer was involved in an accident and charged with “misdemeanor death by vehicle,” while responding to an emergency. This article was analyzed from a teleological and deontological school of thought. The officer was charged because of his action (teleological) rather than the intent (deontological).
The sixth student analyzed an article that involved a baby named Charlie that live in the United Kingdom. Charlie was born with condition that causes his muscles weak and losses motor skills. Charlie has been in the hospital since 2016 and the hospital wanted for the parents to take his ventilator off because the hospital has done all they could. The hospital wants for the parents to provide palliative care for Baby Charlie. However, the parents are trying to utilize an experimental treatment in the United States but the hospital is not letting the parents take their child because the court blocked it. The decision to block the parents is based on deontological school of thought. If the decision was to take Baby Charlie to the United States,
The first student analyzed a Supreme Court decision that was rejected by the court. The case involved five residents who took their case to the Supreme Court because they want to carry a concealed weapon in public. This article was analyzed from a teleological school of thought because the court rejected the case because the less guns citizen has; the more likely that society will be safe. From a deontological school of thought, this case may not have been rejected because it would have been focus on the morals and values …show more content…
The bill going to removed Department of Childre, Youth, and Families (DCYS) under the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). The reason is that they are trying to provide effective services to those who need the services. This article was analyzed from both teleological and deontological school of thought.
The fifth student analyzed an article where a police officer was involved in an accident and charged with “misdemeanor death by vehicle,” while responding to an emergency. This article was analyzed from a teleological and deontological school of thought. The officer was charged because of his action (teleological) rather than the intent (deontological).
The sixth student analyzed an article that involved a baby named Charlie that live in the United Kingdom. Charlie was born with condition that causes his muscles weak and losses motor skills. Charlie has been in the hospital since 2016 and the hospital wanted for the parents to take his ventilator off because the hospital has done all they could. The hospital wants for the parents to provide palliative care for Baby Charlie. However, the parents are trying to utilize an experimental treatment in the United States but the hospital is not letting the parents take their child because the court blocked it. The decision to block the parents is based on deontological school of thought. If the decision was to take Baby Charlie to the United States,