Deontolgy Vs Utilitarianism Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Opposition Between Utilitarianism and Deontolgy
Utilitarianism and deontology oppose one another on many forums. However, it should be noted that these moral theories only are two of five known theoretical approaches concerning bioethics. Therefore, one cannot necessarily formulate straightforward comparisons between these opposing theoretical approaches as they ultimately comprise only a small portion of a relatively broad topic.
The main opposing theme, as mentioned earlier, is that utilitarianism is more consequence-oriented in character, whilst deontology is not. Fundamentally, this might lead to disastrous consequences in deontology and utilitarians would further argue that the outcome of ten deaths is much less desirable than one.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    According to any situation there are two aspects, whether it is “Utilitarian” or “Deontological” from the two points of view whether from the bank’s view or the clients. As mentioned in the previous ethical situation, the client who proposed to the bank with two different balance sheets, he thought that the bank won’t mind to accept his loan and the balance sheet as they would know that businesses don’t prefer to pay too much taxes. From the Bank point of view this is an unethical situation from the client, from the utilitarian point of view: first what “Utilitarian” means, the happiness and satisfaction of greater number of people, and an action is morally right when it’s consequences leads to an overall happiness. The bank here refused to give the client the loan, as the bank consider this situation as a fraud, and running from paying his obligations which are the taxes, so the bank chose to act in a legal and ethical way to give the Bank its reputation and support the Government.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most recent Presidential election in the United States recently came to a wrap, widely being considered one of the most ridiculous elections of all time. When it was announced that the two Presidential finalists were Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, people all around the world were shocked. With Donald Trump having no experience in politics, and Hillary Clinton previously having been in a political position, but landing herself in hot water for deleting thousands of emails, it seemed that America was almost certainly doomed. With the controversial nature of the candidates, many America citizens decided to remove themselves from the equation completely by not voting at all. If I was an American citizen, I would have done the same thing.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of the belief system of deontologists, I strongly believe that deontology attains the strongest and most easily defendable argument out of all the meta-ethical theories. Opposing, utilitarianism is the belief system that morality is doing what will bring…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Among the three ethical theories studied in class, the utilitarian theory can be used in explaining ethical implications of Face Recognition technology. Chonko, Larry (1-5) describes various ethical theories. However, Chonko Larry (2) asserts that utilitarian ethical theory is based on the ability of an individual to predict the significance of an action. Action in this case study is using Facial Recognition technology in iPhone X. According to the theory, an option which results in the greatest benefit to most individuals is the one who is ethically right and correct.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Using a deontological approach for problems in biomedical ethics could be helpful because by choosing to never treat someone as means only is not using them as a way to get to a certain goal. With this idea if you just use someone to get what you want, the person in question is then not valued they are just a way to get to an end. In biomedical ethics if you treat them as an end, doing the moral thing is duty-based and will be done no matter what the consequences are which would likely be helpful when analyzing problems. 6. Prima facie duty is doing something that is assumed to be the correct or right way to do something.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moreland, J. P. (n.d.). Ethics Theories: Utilitarianism Vs. Deontological Ethics - Christian Research Institute. Retrieved July 28, 2015, from http://www.equip.org/article/ethics-theories-utilitarianism-vs-deontological-ethics/ Personal values, beliefs, family background, socio-economic status and culture has direct relationship with the decision making capacity of an individual. For instance, most of people who have grown in poor socio-economic status are always in stressful situation because during their life they always deal with many kinds of challenges and some people take it as a source of strength and make themselves more strong and capable to deal with future situations, which helps them to achieve better ideas to make decision.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontology And Utilitarianism In Nursing Essay

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Deontology focuses on the “principle of the matter” or the actions. Teleology tends to focus more the consequences of the situation. While those who practice Kant’s deontology are bound by duty, the followers of utilitarianism are driven by the pursuit of happiness for all. These two theories are completely opposite in every aspect whether it be the motive, the focus, or the outcome.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology Deontological ethical theories are a contradiction to Consequentialist, or Teleological theories because they are not based off the consequences of your actions. The core of the word means duty or obligation, and that is what the central focus is based on. When used in the manner, the theory would mean that actions are important, rather than consequences. The central philosophy of this theory is categorical imperative, which is just a methodology for evaluating reasons to act in a specific manner. Mitchell expanded on this by saying, “All a person needed to do, Kant thought, was to consider whether a proposed action could serve as a universal law without self-contradiction.”…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue Ethics or Virtue Theory is an approach to ethics with the basis of an individual’s character as the main element of ethical thinking. “Character is virtue in action. ”1 Deontological ethics or deontology is an approach that focuses on the right or wrong of actions and the consequences of those actions. Utilitarian ethics or Utilitarianism approaches ethics through the moral worth of an action which is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility in maximizing happiness or pleasure as among all people.2 Utilitarianism embraces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Deontological and Utilitarian theories primarily aim to identify universal principles that can be applied in any moral situation, whereas…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Deontology

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy: in ancient times it was the driving force of people’s beliefs on how they should go about their everyday lives. Today, it is the backbone of many Theist’s and even Atheist’s beliefs, or lack thereof. For example, Christianity’s Ten Commandments “thou shalt not steal, [and] thou shalt not kill” (Bible, Exodus 20:1-17) has many things in common with Deontology, which is the stance that something is either right or wrong and the right thing should be done no matter the circumstance. On the other hand, Atheists tend to align more with the Consequentialist point of view, which is the stance that whatever benefits the masses is what should be done. Another type of ethics is Religious Ethics, or determining right and wrong from a religious aspect.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deontology thus provides a more compelling argument against animal research than utilitarianism. A major proponent of this outlook is Tom Regan, who has written on the subject in The Case for Animal Rights, in which he bases his argument against animal research on the sentience of animals and consequently their right to be respected as individuals. Regan argues that “if individuals have equal inherent value…we are to treat those individuals…in ways that respect their inherent value” (248). Exploiting animals for scientific knowledge therefore infringes upon their rights in that it disrespects their inherent value. One of deontology’s key principles is to treat individuals as ends rather than means.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Framework Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that I feel aligned to personally. Utilitarianism states that the ethical choice is the one that provides the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people, even if that choice isn’t the best for everyone. Much of our politics are conducted using this approach, making decisions and laws that increase the amount of good while also reducing the amount of harm that is done. I believe this to be the most practical approach to most situations, especially when it comes to government. This is because it is virtually impossible to meet the needs or wants of every single person, so doing the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people is ultimately what is best for the community.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Unlike utilitarianism, deontology does not make situational exceptions, or value pain over pleasure. Deontology values doing what is right, regardless of the situation. The last difference between utilitarianism and deontology is that utilitarianism is based of naturalism, and deontology is based off rationalism. Naturalism is a type of moral judgment that bases ethics and morals on human nature and psychology (Burkhardt and Nathaniel, 25 vol; 2). In naturalism, it is suggested that there are universal judgments and viewpoints that are dependent on how people feel towards specific situations.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are not a lot of instances, in which dying is a better option than the pain one is currently going through. We know the possible pleasures that await us, and these outweigh the current struggles or problems that we may be facing. Looking at how these affect our actions, though, is a way to think about why Utilitarianism is flawed. Just as each human holds their own life important, they too can be thought of as holding their decisions as important. Bernard Williams, in “Utilitarianism and Integrity”, recognizes this concept.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays