Dennis Hiebert Summary

Dennis Hiebert is a professor at the Providence University College. As I read this article I was very pleased with how well it was put together. The author did also answer the questions that he had set out to address. The article was a not at all hard to understand at first, however there are some parts that were just I little difficult. When a part came up that was difficult to understand, just analyzing the segment cleared what I could not understand. The author has a bias towards homosexuality. He wishes to point out that homophobia may be the fear of homosexuals, however he also points out that some homophobes are homoppressors.
These people wish to not allow homosexuals to marry and or have relations. They believe that a homosexual should repents their ways and complete gay conversion. If one didn’t complete the conversion or it didn’t work, they believe that the person should …show more content…
The author did answer the questions that I had. He gave great statistical information and qualitive information. The article is a little difficult to understand for that fact that he continuously repeats information. As an example, he repeatedly explained the meaning of what “marriage-equivalent legal benefits” were. The author doesn’t clearly state that he is either for or against same-sex marriage, however, throughout the entire article I detected subtle hints of bias towards same-sex marriage. The quantitative information was greatly used and it was presents though a little confusing. He presented this information in clusters with exceptions and limitations. The author get his information through many legal books and information given in articles. The author uses for the most part easy to understand verbal inputs; however, he does insert some complicated sentences to show the complexing of the