Nigeria’s present democracy can not be explained without looking at its former military rule. In Nigeria: Democracy on Trial, Cyril I. Obi reports, “all attempts at democratic transition in Nigeria since its independence in 1960 , have been determined and implemented by the ruling faction of the military.” This has created a new type of politician in Nigeria, who tend to be inexperienced in political departments other than the military (Obi). Nigeria has such a long past of military rule, it will take a long time to change. Until the deep roots of military regimes are forgotten, Nigeria will not have a strong democracy. They will continue to hold the militaristic ideals of complete control of power and resources. However, there are signs of advancement through social forces. Some of these achievements are “the registration of more political parties, more respect for human rights, and the formation of a broad-based opposition alliance” …show more content…
When discussing the importance of cross-cutting cleavages, Michael G. Roskin writes, “they are divided of course, but they are divided along several axes, not just one. When these divisions, or cleavages, cut across one another, they actually stabilize political life.” Surprisingly, religion is one of Nigeria’s cross-cutting cleavages (Roskin 442). Even though religion is tightly knit with tribe, not all members of each tribe share the same religion, for example, “not all Nigerian Muslims are Hausa-Fulani of the north; some are Yoruba in the southwest, and others are Ijaw in the Delta” (Roskin 442). Education and occupation are also cross-cutting cleavages. Despite the few cross-cutting cleavages Nigeria has, it is not enough. The lack of them holds Nigeria back in its quest for