Being in a group is scarcely like being stranded on an island with a group of strangers that you have to collaborate with in order to get home. While on this island you anon face the task of culling a bellwether to lead you off this terrible island. In the Delta group, which consisted of Alejandro Arango, Alexandra Plfug, Richard Rokosz, Josh Nabatilan, and myself establishing a sense of unity came facile. Though when we first commenced surmising group roles many problems commenced to arise. I then realized that this would become a classic tale of “Too many Indians and not enough Chiefs.”
One of the first activities the group worked on together was a case study: Desert Isle. Having to cull one leader out of a handful of aptitudinal individuals revealed to be a pressing task. Richard and I commenced to quarrel over whether the Plastic Surgeon or the First Mate would be the more congruous choice. I optate the first mate because he was skilled on the seas, personable, young and able, and experienced in engineering. Richard optate the plastic surgeon because he was an excellent …show more content…
He is adroit in generating new ideas and then strategically analyzing them as well as solving incipient and challenging problems. This caused Alejandro to naturally emerge as our group’s Chairperson and authoritatively mandate us on ways to consummate our goal. Thus extinguishing the potency struggle between Richard and I. Though once Richard realized that he would not be able to postulate the leadership role he became the Deserter, one who withdraws from group discussions and seems “above it all.” (Engleberg 55) Aberrantly Richard and Alejandro shared many of the same qualities; such as being task oriented, relationship motivated, and ENTP personalities, though they seemed like polar opposites. Alejandro was always fixated on the group achieving its goal while Richard was disinterested and infrequently
One of the first activities the group worked on together was a case study: Desert Isle. Having to cull one leader out of a handful of aptitudinal individuals revealed to be a pressing task. Richard and I commenced to quarrel over whether the Plastic Surgeon or the First Mate would be the more congruous choice. I optate the first mate because he was skilled on the seas, personable, young and able, and experienced in engineering. Richard optate the plastic surgeon because he was an excellent …show more content…
He is adroit in generating new ideas and then strategically analyzing them as well as solving incipient and challenging problems. This caused Alejandro to naturally emerge as our group’s Chairperson and authoritatively mandate us on ways to consummate our goal. Thus extinguishing the potency struggle between Richard and I. Though once Richard realized that he would not be able to postulate the leadership role he became the Deserter, one who withdraws from group discussions and seems “above it all.” (Engleberg 55) Aberrantly Richard and Alejandro shared many of the same qualities; such as being task oriented, relationship motivated, and ENTP personalities, though they seemed like polar opposites. Alejandro was always fixated on the group achieving its goal while Richard was disinterested and infrequently