Del Lago Partners Case

Improved Essays
The Texas Supreme Court case involving the Del Lago Partners, Inc., and Del Lago Partners, L.P. vs. Bradley Smith has to do with a group of fraternity brothers and a wedding party in a bar. An altercation ended up occurring once the wedding party entered the bar later in the night. According to the case details, some members of the wedding party grew angry as a result of a few of the fraternity members fraternizing with some of the ladies who came with the wedding party. An argument ensued and eventually, members of the wedding party got into a physical altercation with members of the fraternity.
The Supreme Court judges decided in favor of Bradley Smith in regards to this particular case. The main point of the case involves whether or not the person who owns an establishment should be held responsible for injuries that
…show more content…
Their logic was rooted in the fact that the members of the fraternity party had ample time and opportunity to remove themselves from a situation any reasonable person could see was about to get bad. The justices reasoned the owner of the establishment should not be held responsible for the injuries that occurred to the defendant, as there was no specific warning word they could have used to get everyone to leave the premises in order to avoid any of the injuries from happening. Moreover, since the courts have yet to establish a word that establishment owners can use when dangerous situations occur within their businesses that can lead to patron being injured or worse. Noteworthy, the dissenting judges are Justices Hecht, Wainwright, and Johnson. Interestingly, the research reveals that the dissenting opinion of Justice Hecht was later joined by Justice Johnson. Overall, these judges thought that Del Lago should not have been held liable as it pertained to the fight that broke out in the establishment which resulted in Mr. Bradley Smith being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kuehn v. Pub Zone and Soldano v. O’Daniels were both involved in attacks that took place in a bar. Should both parties come out the same? And if so, which way? In favor of the plaintiffs or owner defendants? Bars and saloons have been known to be very popular places for customers to get into arguments that can lead to fights or attacks, my personal opinion for that being the place of most fights is that alcohol makes men or women more aggravated easier acting more on their emotions rather than thinking actions through.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1) Oregon vs. Smith, is a United States Supreme Court case that determined wither or not the state could reject unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state’s narcotic prohibition, even if the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. Legally states have the right to accommodate some illegal acts done in pursuit of religious beliefs, but they are not required to make accommodations. This made The Supreme Court decision a major event in Native American religious beliefs, the case attracted widespread support form not only Native religious beliefs but also voodoo religious beliefs. Oregon v. Smith had a diverse range of religious groups eager to protect their own religious freedom and their use of spiritual medicine.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The judges writing the majority decision are McLachlin C.J. and Major, Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron JJ. and the judges writing the dissenting decision are Bastarche and LeBel JJ. The appellant, Jean-Paul Labaye, operated a club in Montreal, called l’Orage. The majority states that the purpose of the club was to permit couples and single people to meet each other for group sex and only members and their guests were allowed in the club.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Van Orden v. Perry Ramos, 2 Van Orden v. Perry: Government Involvement in Religious Practices Frank Ramos Liberty High School AP Government 3AB Van Orden v. Perry was a U.S. Supreme Court case held in 2005, about a Texas resident that argued that the capital of Texas was violating the Establishment Clause by having the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the state capital building (Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2015). The Establishment Clause is found in the first amendment and states that no law shall be passed ? respecting an establishment of religion?…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The violation of the rights resulted in injury below is a summary of the case and how there was negligence on the defendants’ behalf. Kelly B. Niles was playing softball on a school playground in a recreation program which was operated…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miller Vs Alabama

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case Miller v.s Alabama is a very controversial case that was heard by the Supreme Court in 2012. The case is about Miller 8th Amendment right of not being cruelly or unusually punish. Fourteen year old Evan Miller alongside his partner/co-defendant Colby Smith were allegedly accused of beating…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Limitations is a fictional novel following the story of Judge George Mason from present-day to forty-years in the past. Mason works at the Court of Appeals in Kindle County (based on Cook County, Chicago, Illinois). The present-day case is People v. Jacob Warnovits et. al., an appeal for gang-rape; forty-years ago, Mason was personally involved in the gang-rape of a young woman named Lolly Viccino. Interwoven through the main storyline is the hunt for #1, an anonymous source sending Mason threatening messages, and the cancer treatment of Patrice, Mason’s wife.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wesson Company Controversy

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Product Liability Essay City of Gary v. Smith & Wesson Corp Plaintiff: In this particular case, the party who initiated the lawsuit was the city of Gary, Indiana, by its mayor, Scott L. King, with the intention of obtaining both injunctive relief and monetary compensation for the harm allegedly caused by the unlawful marketing and distribution of handguns. Defendants: Manufacturers -Smith & Wesson Corp., Beretta USA Corp., Glock Corp, Charter Arms Corp., Hi-Point Firearms Corp., Navegar, Inc., Intratec USA Corp., Bryco Arms Corp., Phoenix Arms Corp., Lorcin Engineering Corp., Sturm, Ruger & Co. Corp., & Taurus Firearms Corp Wholesaler -B.L. Jennings, Inc. Distributers - Ameri-Pawn of Lake Station, Ink., Blythe Sports Shop, Inc., Cash Indiana,…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The plaintiff then fell backwards and hit his head on the pavement. The defendant was charged with the intentional tort of battery. The Court in that case ruled that the defendant’s use of force was not excessive since the defendant, on numerous occasions, asked the plaintiff to calm down, and the plaintiff instead became physical with the defendant by pushing him. The court stated that since the plaintiff was intoxicated and belligerent towards the defendant it was reasonable for him to believe that the plaintiff was a reasonable threat therefore his force in defending himself was not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deloitte Case

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Deloitte is one of the Big 4 public accounting firms organized as a limited liability partnership. It has offices in multiple locations, including Wilton, Connecticut, where it houses certain firm-wide functions included as part of its National Office. This case concerns Deloitte’s violation of Act and PCAOB rules when it permitted its former partner, Anderson, CPA, to continue activities related to preparing and issuing public company audit reports after he was suspended for one year by the PCAOB on October 31, 2008. On October 31, 2008, the Board issued the Anderson Order that resulted from Anderson’s violation of PCAOB rules and auditing standards when he served as engagement partner for Deloitte’s audit of the fiscal year 2003 financial…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    his is the Supreme Court opinion in the case which involves the case of United States v. Fields. A man named, Abel Fields. who is a resident of California, is being tried for the Stolen Valor Act. In 2011. Abel Fields spoke publicly at a meeting he attend.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Colorado Civil Rights Commission, I am ruling in favor of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Both sides presented very good arguments, and for the majority of the case, I struggled to make a decision. In the end, my final decision was made based on what the effects of allowing Phillips to abuse this law would be. If Phillips were allowed to discriminate based on his religious beliefs, it would make it possible for more people to do so, to the point where the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act would be rendered useless. Both sides had their rights violated, but initially it was only Charlie and David that did.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays