Government Shutdown

Improved Essays
Growing up in America today, one might formulate an image of a U.S. Senator or Congressman as a dignified statesman, willing to reason and compromise with colleagues from the other side of the aisle in an effort to improve the wellbeing of the country. This is largely due to historical representations of the Founders and subsequent important figures learned in elementary and middle school courses, as well as depictions found in various classic movies and television shows. However, upon reaching the age at which newspapers and serious newscasts become interesting to us, we soon realize that these representations are quite false. Indeed, today, the lack of willingness to compromise on any number of important issues has led to unprecedented gridlock …show more content…
The possibility of a government shutdown was increasing by the day, and on September twenty-ninth two-thousand thirteen Congress was becoming frantic. Their job was to create a budget for the two-thousand fourteen fiscal year. The main issue was that the republicans wanted to defund the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, while the democrats refused to sign off on the budget if the Affordable Care Act is affected. Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, stated “I want to be absolutely crystal clear: Any bill that defunds Obamacare is dead, dead.” After two whole day of back-and-forth between the House and Senate, on Tuesday, October first two-thousand thirteen, at one in the morning the Federal government shutdown. As a result, eight-hundred thousand federal employees were placed on furlough, mandatory time off without pay, indefinitely. Over one million federal employees were forced to show up to work without knowing when they will get paid, theses employees worked for services that were deemed essential, medicare, mail delivery, tax collection and the military, all other federal services were shut down. These conditions lasted until Thursday, October seventeenth two-thousand thirteen. In the end, the republicans had to give in due to the inability to fund another day of the Federal Government. With a Senate vote of …show more content…
The first being having the Speaker of the House be an outsider, rather than a member. Based on Article one section two clause five of the United States Constitution, that states “The House of Representatives shall chuse (sic) their Speaker and other Officers.", the House does not have to choose a member of the majority to be the speaker, despite that being the tradition. The way this would run smoothly would be if the chosen person was someone who was respected by both parties. The reason being, though the Speaker does not usually vote or participate in debates, if they had to their decision wouldn’t be based solely on their party loyalty. If he was an active participant in politics rather than just a commentator, I believe that David Brooks would be perfect for the job. His title is a republican but he is highly respected by democrats. The second possible solution would be to make it mandatory that the Rules Committee membership have equal parts democrats and republicans. The Rules Committee’s job is to consider bills and determine whether and in what order to schedule a bills consideration on the House floor. If there were equal membership, both would have to have to be satisfied before the piece of legislation was brought to the floor, which naturally creates compromise. (“Wrestling

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In recent years, Congress has become increasingly polarized in terms of partisanship. The definition of partisan polarization is the separation of the two major parties as they move towards more severe issue positions. In other words, the members of Congress – both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate – tend to be either extremely liberal (corresponding to the Democratic party), or extremely conservative (corresponding to the Republican party). There are currently few members of the U.S. Congress that consider themselves to be moderates. Political scientists and journalists alike have speculated on why this phenomenon is occurring now, and some theories claim that this polarization is a return to the “natural” state of government,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fangzhou Chen Professor Ray English 1A 1243 08/27/2016 Assignment 1 Rhetorical Analysis of “ Why is‘Compromise’ Now a Dirty Word? ” When it comes to compromise, what is the first thing that comes out from your mind? Is it an advantage or disadvantage? The answers to this question vary from people to people, regions to regions. People who regard compromise as an advantage, say that compromise helps reach a mutual agreement among conflicting groups.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States congress is a bicameral legislature with a lower chamber known as the House of Representatives and the higher being known as the Senate. Congress men and women have various rights and privileges to help them serve the nation the best way possible. Congress checks on the courts and on the President. The constitution gives very broad powers to the congress “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the United States” (Politics in America) The founding fathers envisioned congress being the most powerful branch of government.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The Rise of the Washington Establishment” is a fascinating article by Morris P. Fiorina that argues that members of Congress become egocentric within their own professional careers instead of seeking to represent those voters that…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, our government is made up of people with different political ideologies and assertions. Our association with certain political parties is an example of our differences. Republicans and Democrats throughout history have represented the interests of their supporters rightfully. Conservatives have contrasting views upon the economy, social issues, and international policy. Liberals uphold democracy to its highest standards and support an equal political community.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, even within this tame political arena, Democrats still identified strongly with their candidates and rooted intensely for them, and vice versa for Republicans. Although past electorates were undoubtedly just as zealously partisinal as contemporary voters, the political polarization seen today is unlike the partisanship of the past. Transitioning from an age of high politics, American Congressmen, in recent years, have no longer been unified by the external threat of the Soviet Union (or any serious international threat for that matter); instead of debating foreign policy, domestic issues have filled the gap. Now free to debate every manner of domestic issue, party lines have become more concrete, leading to an excavation of the center of the bell curve and a decline in ‘across the aisle’ mingling. In contrast to prior decades, it was enthusiastic partisanship for their candidate (and by extension, their party) rather than having fundamentally incompatible beliefs that fueled their pious…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The design of two houses making up Congress allows the wants of the people to never be settled, because neither side can reach an agreement. The founding fathers’ intentions for Congress to be a government in which the people are represented and heard clearly failed due to the never-ending cycle of The Washington Establishment, the most prominent evidence of a broken government. No government is perfect; however, America should set an example to other countries as one with a government that truly represents its constituents, not as one with a broken…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is polarization? Throughout the course of American history, arguments occur regarding what role and function the government should play in the democratic process. Since the formation of two major political parties during the 1800s, political polarization began to impact how the government functions. According to Political Polarization in American Politics, polarization is defined as diverging from median Republican and Democratic views and increases when the political stances and ideologies move further to the left or right of the middle, central view (Hopkins and Sides 2015, 17).…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Incivility is not a new topic in American politics, in fact, it has continued to get worse over the years. In “The Negative Consequences of Uncivil Political Discourse” Sandy Maisel states that the “lack of civility has led to the decline in citizen approval of trust in our institutions of government” (Maisel 405). Maisel discusses the impact of incivility and how it can sway the public opinion to doubt the way politics are being handled. He discussing about how uncivil outbursts are not what cause concern, it is the lack of action, since politicians use this as a strategy to obtain more supporters and votes (Maisel 405). Maisel believes those who pursue the common good do so in a civil manner because civility is necessary to have an effective…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congressional Term Limits

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Proponents argue that term limits, which restrict the number of terms a legislator can hold office, can result in greater diversity, can allow new ideas, and can reduce corruption within Congress. However, opponents argue that term limits bring inexperienced, and therefore incapable, individuals into Congress. They also argue that incumbents are more aware of their constituents’ needs and have the incentive to provide for them; therefore, term limits are not necessary. Although both sides make very good points, term limits are in fact necessary in Congress. This reform proposal could solve many problems within Congress by bringing in fresh ideas and…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Congressional approval ratings have proven to be dependent upon the partisan lens in which the public views their legislative decisions. The public tends to have higher approval ratings when Congress approves legislation that aligns with their political views and lower approval ratings when congress approves legislation that does not. However, in “How Partisan Conflict in Congress Affects Public Opinion: Strategies, Outcomes, and Issue Differences” Flynn and Harbridge examine how approval ratings are affected when congressional decisions result in legislative gridlock. They find that when compared to partisan conflict resulting in partisan wins, loses, or and gridlock, the latter results in the least public approval.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, political trends seem to repeat themselves, especially when it comes to political parties. A common political trend in the U.S. is a concept known as divided government, in which one party controls the White House and the other controls Congress. It happens almost every election, and is occurring now, with Obama, a Democrat, in office, and the majority party in Congress being the Republicans. Along those same lines, a previous trend is reoccurring once again. “Radical Republicans” are starting to pop up within Congress, similar to what occurred in the 1960s.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In deciding the books “Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate” and “Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S.” for review, the central topic to consider for discussion quite literally hits us over the head via the book titles. But to be thorough (tedious) I shall mention it more blatantly: The topic for this review discussion is the concept of Filibustering. The opportunity and method to filibuster is what gives the US Senate an interesting twist to its proceedings. The right of senators to singly or in a group, speak for an unlimited time unless opponents can secure sixty votes, also known as a super-majority, to impose cloture is preserved in the chamber's traditions and practices.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The symptom is "Government disservice." A new report with this diagnosis is particularly timely as Congress again toys with the American public and its workforce with another threat to shut down the government. The title of the report, "Government Disservice," by the Partnership for Public Service, aptly describes what Congress does when it leads the country to the brink of a shutdown, as it is doing now, or worse, as was the case two years ago when a partial shutdown closed many government operations for 16 days. Republican opposition to federal funding for Planned Parenthood could result in government workers being sent home and offices closing their doors after the fiscal year ends on Sept. 30.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Political Polarization “The unanswered question of American politics in this era is whether our divided political system can function in times of stress” (Ezra Klein). Our political system is comprised of two parties with opposite views on important topics. When the representatives of these parties experience more constraint to vote towards their party 's stance on issues they are less likely to compromise and therefore get less accomplished.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays