Judicial Deference

Improved Essays
Introduction
This paper is based on varied literature including journal articles, research papers, online resources, edited books, etc. The main focus of this paper is to examine the UK courts procedure in relation to the concept of deference with regards section 3 and section 4 of the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998, it’s limitations and the essence of judicial deference to legislation and the interference of Parliamentary supremacy. In addition, it would be potent to highlight ‘the judicial approach to the scheme of the HRA particularly the interpretation and application of the interpretive obligation laid down in s 3 and the power to declare legislation incompatible under s4 as well as the construction by the judiciary of a principle of deference’
…show more content…
In addition, despite the preliminary scepticism, it can be seen that the HRA’s protection of rights extended to the protection of asylum-seekers, gay and transsexual individuals, terrorist suspects and other groups in jeopardy, which have been assisted from the judgements, made in their favour.

Limitations

Edwards points out that though deference may have a role to play in a branch of the proportionality test, as a general principle the circumstantial perspective of the judiciary at this stage of the said test would not be adequate as a practice of its standard implementation.

The most detrimental form of deference is where the judicature adopts it at the pre-limitation stage. This is illustrated in Poplar Housing , the Court of Appeal empowered the s21(4) Housing Act 1996 which authorized the eviction of the defendant, which essentially intervened with Article 8(1) right to home life.

Conclusion

Of the 18 cases that have declared incompatible, on 17 have resulted in amendments of change to the legislation.
Among the 17 cases, which resulted in changes to the legislation, arguably only 8 were associated with the dialogue procedure between the judicature, legislature and the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    [We] have aptly summarized this quest, based on [the Court of Appeals’] past decisions, as one that requires an examination of the statutory text in context, a review of legislative history to confirm conclusions or resolve questions from that examination, and a consideration of the consequences of alternative readings. “Text is the plain language of the relevant provision, typically given its ordinary meaning, viewed in context, considered in light of the whole statute, and generally evaluated for ambiguity. Legislative purpose, either apparent from the text or gathered from external sources, often informs, if not controls, our reading of the statute. An examination of interpretive consequences, either as a comparison of the results of each proffered construction, or as a principle of avoidance of an absurd or unreasonable reading, grounds the court’s interpretation in reality.” Town of Oxford v. Koste, 204 Md. App. 578, 585–86, 42 A.3d 637 (2012), aff'd, 431 Md. 14, 63 A.3d 582 (2013) (citations…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hutchinson and Monahan see the thick rule of law as being committed to a certain vision of social justice that has respect for individual rights and fights to protect them. It serves to actively limit democratic rule by having an active judiciary that is able to strike down invalid laws in defense of political morality. The main distinction between the two visions of the rule of law is the way in which justice is utilized. With thin rule of law, procedural justice operates with common law and deals with and lays down the ways and means by which substantive law can be enforced. The thick rule of law is based on substantive law which is in turn represented by the implementation of statutory law by governmental powers in an effort to establish rights and obligations of individuals.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is a standard for overturning prior precedent—looking at “factual, cultural, and economic changes, reliance interests, and the change in the legal environment.” While there is not a precise line that must be reached in order to automatically trigger the Court to overturn stare decisis, the problems that exist with an archaic rule will keep progressing until a new solution is formulated.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Olaf Dietrich: Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Others, however, were not so approving of the decision. Concerns were raised as to the effect that this might have on available funds to legal aid bodies in general. Would the decision mean that funds would be diverted to criminal matters at the expense of family law and civil law matters? Some were concerned that the legal system would become clogged with defendants pleading not guilty rather than guilty, as was the previous requirement for receiving legal…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    R. V. Williams Case Study

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the defence took a distinctive decision, they argued that the “Sherratt”, established that the right to challenge for cause was unnecessary (R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128. 31. Supreme Court. 04 June 1998. Print).…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Influence

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Powers and Influences of the Supreme Court Founding father Alexander Hamilton once stated that he believed that the Judicial Branch would be the weak link of the three government branches. However, the branch is much more powerful than Hamilton could have ever expected. The Supreme Court has a lot of power, including judicial review that helps them be empowered when it comes to checks and balances. They also have the ability to grant a writ of certiorari to have cases sent up for a review.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When justices on the bench of the United States Supreme Court make their respective decisions on a case, they are faced with two outcomes. The first is that they can decide to overturn a decision from a lower court, deem a federal law unconstitutional, or nullify other federal or state statute. When the Supreme Court changes previous statute or overturns a previous court decision, it is judicial activism. But when the Supreme Court decides to uphold precedent, upholding laws passed by Congress or state legislatures, or strictly adhering to the original text of the Constitution, it is judicial restraint. Although the aforementioned terms do not have any overlap in their definitions, it can often be seen that both of these judicial practices can be implemented in a single Supreme Court ruling.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will discuss the different models of the bill of rights adopted in other countries to demonstrate how Australia is isolated from global trend. It will assess human right protection…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The intention of the accused was to causing damages the property. However the accused was unaware of the people sleeping in the property. Thus resulting of being charged with endangering human life with arson. Lord Diplock decided, being drunk was not a defense of recklessness by removing the objective test set in previous decisions. As mentioned before in R v G (2003) the objective test was again put back and was judged with consideration of their age and mentality .…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a. contemporaneous sources of meaning- contemporary sources existed during the time a constitutional provision or amendment was ratified. “The sources included the provision in question, arguments of constitutional structure, and arguments of history” (Kelso, R 1994). b. subsequent juridical events take place after the ratification of a provision, which affects the meaning of a provision. The meaning of a provision can be affecting in a number of ways. “Subsequent non-juridical events, that is, nonofficial acts such as an evolving community consensus or societal tradition, have a much more limited interpretive impact, and typically affect only how some judges view general concepts embedded in the Constitution' or view non-interpretive considerations” (Kelso, R 1994).…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Hale's Dicta

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Second, Lady Hale’s dicta highlights the suggestion that courts may “treat with suspicion, or even reject any legislation that subverts the rule of law” . This poses a challenge to Parliament’s sovereignty since it suggests dismantling the negative limb of Dicey’s conception, as well as a restrictive measure to the positive limb against Parliament’s wishes. Lord Bingham, however, upheld Parliamentary sovereignty in his dicta by stating that “The bedrock of the British Constitution is … the Supremacy of the Crown in Parliament ”, and noted in his book that there is no authority for the proposition that the courts may strike down Acts that the court deems extreme, and that the very idea of it is “heretical” . Parliament typically accepts the…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays