The models use to regulated prostitution can either benefit the workers or endanger them. There are many countries that have used one of this models and it has worked for them. However, Canada has taken a different approach to regulating prostitution by creating Bill C-36 and is following the Swedish model for the sex industry. Canada views on prostitution are based on false assumptions and stigma around sex industry, which does not help the sex industry. Looking at criminalization, decriminalization, and legalization models and its pro and cons in this essay will help see which model is better suited for Canada.
Firstly, looking at legalization of sex work allows for better environment for the workers. As a matter of fact, Tusikov (2015) discussed …show more content…
As a matter a fact, Tusikov (2015) discussed that decriminalizing sex work with decrease the stigma surrounding it. Decriminalizing sex work will allow sex workers not to be arrested for the work that they or how the let the market and society know what they have to offer. This allows the sex workers to be looked at as a self-employer and they will have the same rights and responsibilities as someone who is self-employed but not in the sex industry. This will help them to be protected by the same laws and they are treated as equal member of society instead of being socially ignored. It will also remove the stigma around sex work and decriminalizing it will allow there to be diversity in sex work and allow them to manage their workplace. And yet, there are some issues that are from decriminalizing sex work. For this reason, decriminalizing sex work means that is exploiting women. For one thing, many people believe that these women are being exploited by men and are used for sex and their body. Many would see decriminalizing sex work would not benefit the women at all, but instead but the women in more danger. All things consider, decriminalizing sex work would benefit the work aspects making certain acts legal, but it can be seen as exploiting …show more content…
As a matter of fact, Tusikov (2015) discussed that the criminalization of sex wok is shaped by politics, economic condition and ideologies that help shapes class, race, sexuality age, and religion and immigration status. This is an intersecting identity of these sex works into criminalizing sex work. Tusikov (2015) acknowledges that criminalizing sex work allows the sex industry to dry up and there is no longer a sale of sex. The goal is to help eradicate the sex industry and it seen as a dangerous place for women. This allows for the government to take control of the sex industry and dispose of it because they see it as problem that is ruining the country and society. Then again, criminalizing sex work has it flaws as well. Gender, Violence and Health (2014) acknowledge that criminalizing sex work does not benefit them at all and in fact it put them in danger. Many of the sex workers are nonexistent in society and by criminalizing sex work it allows them to be more alienated and isolated because of the side-line of false assumptions about sex work. In spite of, false assumptions that is shown in Bill C-36 there is also stigma. Stigma plays a role in the Bill C-36 when the Canadian government made this. The government thinks it is better to brand sex workers with stigma because it will allow them to have a social death and making even more no existing to society. In the long run,
Firstly, looking at legalization of sex work allows for better environment for the workers. As a matter of fact, Tusikov (2015) discussed …show more content…
As a matter a fact, Tusikov (2015) discussed that decriminalizing sex work with decrease the stigma surrounding it. Decriminalizing sex work will allow sex workers not to be arrested for the work that they or how the let the market and society know what they have to offer. This allows the sex workers to be looked at as a self-employer and they will have the same rights and responsibilities as someone who is self-employed but not in the sex industry. This will help them to be protected by the same laws and they are treated as equal member of society instead of being socially ignored. It will also remove the stigma around sex work and decriminalizing it will allow there to be diversity in sex work and allow them to manage their workplace. And yet, there are some issues that are from decriminalizing sex work. For this reason, decriminalizing sex work means that is exploiting women. For one thing, many people believe that these women are being exploited by men and are used for sex and their body. Many would see decriminalizing sex work would not benefit the women at all, but instead but the women in more danger. All things consider, decriminalizing sex work would benefit the work aspects making certain acts legal, but it can be seen as exploiting …show more content…
As a matter of fact, Tusikov (2015) discussed that the criminalization of sex wok is shaped by politics, economic condition and ideologies that help shapes class, race, sexuality age, and religion and immigration status. This is an intersecting identity of these sex works into criminalizing sex work. Tusikov (2015) acknowledges that criminalizing sex work allows the sex industry to dry up and there is no longer a sale of sex. The goal is to help eradicate the sex industry and it seen as a dangerous place for women. This allows for the government to take control of the sex industry and dispose of it because they see it as problem that is ruining the country and society. Then again, criminalizing sex work has it flaws as well. Gender, Violence and Health (2014) acknowledge that criminalizing sex work does not benefit them at all and in fact it put them in danger. Many of the sex workers are nonexistent in society and by criminalizing sex work it allows them to be more alienated and isolated because of the side-line of false assumptions about sex work. In spite of, false assumptions that is shown in Bill C-36 there is also stigma. Stigma plays a role in the Bill C-36 when the Canadian government made this. The government thinks it is better to brand sex workers with stigma because it will allow them to have a social death and making even more no existing to society. In the long run,