Decision Making In A Criminal Case Analysis

Improved Essays
If the verdict in a criminal case does not produce the intended results and a defendant still maintains his innocence, one has a legal right to appeal the conviction. Keith S. Hampton, Attorney at Law, has been a criminal attorney in the Austin, Texas, area for more than two decades, and he understands the processes involved in appealing a conviction. It's important to remember that a lower court's verdict doesn't have to be the end of the story.

Here, Attorney Hampton offers some legal advice and breaks the appeals process down into three fundamental steps.

Strategy: The first step to appealing a conviction is to figure out the proper legal avenues to pursue. Is the defendant asking for the verdict to be overturned and a new verdict of "not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Lindbergh Baby Case Study

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will discuss and provide an analysis how the three main components of the criminal justice system: Police, Courts, and Corrections apply to the 1932 Lindbergh Baby Case. In addition, this essay will discuss how first appearance, preliminary hearing, and arraignment apply to the Lindbergh Baby Case. Finally, this essay will discuss adjudication, sentencing, and corrections pertaining to the Lindbergh baby kidnapping. In 1927, Charles Lindbergh and his family had received a lot of attention after he flew nonstop across the Atlantic Ocean from New York City to Paris.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ireland V Brady Summary

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) Facts of the Case: John Leo Brady was arrested, tried and found guilty in a Maryland court for murder. The other man Donald Boblit had a separate trial. During Brady’s trial, he testified that even though he was involved with the robbery that Boblit was the one who committed the murder not him. The lawyer for Brady asked the prosecution to see all Boblit’s statements to get ready for trial but the prosecution withheld one statement in which Boblit admitted to committing the murder. Brady was found guilty by a jury of murder and was given a death sentence.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R Vs Misaac Case Study

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    R. v. MacIsaac, 2015 ONCA 587 Her Majesty the Queen (R.) and Gordon MacIsaac (Apl.) FACTS The appellant (Apl.) and the complainant (Compl.) were both members of senior men’s “no-contact” hockey league, but belonged to different teams. On the day in question, these teams were facing off against each other with the Compl.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court thus reversed the Court of Appeals of Maryland’s judgment and the case has been remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heffernan Case Summary

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There was also the issue that if the prosecutor’s office decided to challenge the appeal that the result would most likely be the denial of retrial. This would not address the fact that a legal right had been denied to the defendant. So by backing the…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Discuss at least three ways that evidence/crime scene was mishandled and could have been managed better. One of the main evidence that was mishandled by the prosecution were DNA tests. The state crime lab failed to find any player’s DNA match to the found DNA, so the prosecutor requested a private crime lab to conduct their own tests.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Interdependant Court Case

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Therefore, the appellant brought up four grounds of appeal, and the first ground of appeal was granted under the remedy. The first ground was that the cross- examination was unfair and improper. Therefore, a new trial was ordered, and the issue of credibility risen. 2. It is crown counsel's job to convince the judge or jury that the appellant intended to commit a crime.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mayor of ACME city has made a discretionary decision, based on her opinion of criminals getting off easy due to plea bargaining, to ban the practice of plea bargaining by prosecutors. This discretionary decision is based off of the opinion that criminals are being let off easy and not being properly punished through the process of plea bargaining. Nevertheless, this decision is not a decision that should be agreed with. The argument against the mayor’s decision will be demonstrated through the positive effects that plea bargaining has on courts including the defense, prosecution and judges along with their staff and resources. Secondly, the penalties of removing plea bargaining would not solve any crime problems but would create and inequality…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Race, ethnicity, and the criminal justice system , Rosich establishes how race comes into action when dealing with the criminal justice system. There are multiple things that occur within the criminal justice system when pertaining to minorities. The author presents and critiques the devastating relationship between police and minorities. Also, while discussing racial profiling and the contrasting prison procedures minorities’ encounter. One general racial separation that was provided with the criminal justice system is police brutality with minorities.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The purpose of releasing a defendant on bond is to ensure that the defendant will make an appearance later on to continue the criminal justice process (Bohm & Haley, 2014). The setting of a bond allows defendants to be released to continue their day to day life but return at a later date to finish their case. Bond setting is a right that some defendants have under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, it is not guaranteed (Bohm & Haley, 2014). In this scenario, I believe that the judge did have a right to release Danielle on bond. Both of her offenses were felonies, but they were not considered violent crimes.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A prosecutor’s job is to search for the truth, to get the judge and jury to favor in the right direction for a defendant whether guilty or innocent and truth is supposed to triumph. However, this is not how the criminal justice system works when speaking of the minority. Innocent individuals are being charged for crimes they did not commit and are being interrogated and threated to except all blame for crimes. Prosecutors bully defendants into pleading guilty and accepting plea-bargains. These prosecutors believe in playing with defendants’ incompetence, so they focus on their lack of knowledge to get the case closed and someone locked down.…

    • 2159 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Krouse v. Graham 19 Cal.3d 59, 562 P.2d 1022, 137 Cal. Rptr. 863 Facts: The Krouse family was returning from a grocery shopping trip and their car was parked on the curb. When Elizabeth (the wife) and Vinka Mladinov (neighbor) were returning to shut the door of the car, Graham hits a curb and rear ends the parked car. This results in the hitting the neighbor (Mladinov) and Elizabeth (the mother).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sermonfils E Dor 1.Describe and distinguish among the three approaches to studying criminal justice systems by taking an international perspective. Comparative criminal justice is a subfield of the study of criminal justice that relates different justice system from around the world. There are three different ways of studying criminal justice systems. Each of these approaches encounter various beliefs of different societies. The criminal justice systems have changed and transformed over time.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When considering The Post Office Robbery, one would have to first take in the fact of how the suspect will be sentenced. There are sentencing parameters that have to be followed. These guidelines are usually imposed on a suspect at sentencing. Research shows that most adhere to the following: • Acceptance of Responsibility • Criminal Background • Career Offender • Livelihood of the criminal Most Judge of the Courts has the above guidelines to measure when handing down a sentence to a suspect. Also, the points of concerns placed by both parties can play a vital part in the verdict process as well.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays