Difference Between Trolley And Trolley Problem

Decent Essays
Decision-making is a common part of human life. Everyday people make decisions with resulting implications ranging from the mundane to possibly life-altering. The trolley and transplant problems bring up issues surrounding the morality of decisions. Most notably, they bring up questions regarding justified and unjustified killings. The trolley and transplant problems both involve the decision of killing one person to save the lives of five others. In the transplant problem, most people think that it would be permissible to kill one person in order to save five lives. In the transplant problem, however, most people would think it impermissible to kill one in order to save five people. Although the choices in the two cases are the same, some …show more content…
A person in this situation would probably only have at most five minutes to quickly decide what to do with the situation at hand. The person does not have enough time to think of a potential solution that would save everyone. Or maybe the person might not be thinking of a logical, morally acceptable solution at all. The person is probably thinking as a whole -- how does he save the majority? On the other hand, in the transplant case there seems to be more time to weigh various options and solutions. Most notably there is more time to decide on the best course of action, which leads to …show more content…
In the trolley problem, it is reasonable to believe that the person driving is on a set path. He cannot go off the set path and head in another direction. If he did decide to turn and kill one person, the cause of death on the death certificate would be that he was hit by trolley; however, in the transplant case, if the doctor killed one person, the death would be classified as homicide. This begs the question of whether the trolley or trolley driver was actually in control of the deaths in the situation. Most people would probably argue that the trolley hit the person, which ultimately caused the death of a passer. In the transplant case, there would be more guilt assigned to the doctor than to the weapon used. The doctor, if he chose to kill, would have to thoroughly plan to kill the person which makes the doctor more in control than the trolley

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Jeffery Dahmer, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson are three very well known serial killers. Society has deemed these individuals crazy psychopaths for their violent crimes and behaviors. However, is there an underlying reason, or mechanism, that has influenced their behavior? More specifically, is there a region, or regions, of the brain that play a role in the planning and execution of violent crimes such as these? Researchers hypothesize that dysfunction in the frontal lobe region, specifically the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala, may be the answer behind psychopathy.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine winning a lottery in which an individual must give their life by allowing a doctor to harvest al viable organs in order to save the lives of others. In John Harris’s article The Survival Lottery this scenario is all too real. Each individual is given a number, if two or more individuals are in need of an organ transplantation a doctor has the right to utilize the survival lottery method in which an individual’s number is randomly generated by a computer, if this occurs they must donate all viable organs to those in need. It is easy to see how this comes across as unethical and morally wrong, but what makes it solely unjust to give an individual’s organs away to those in need is not so easily understood. A human being should not be forced…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sense vs. Sensibility Making choices is fundamental to our lives. When we are making decisions, the biggest paradox may be the conflict between the sense and the sensibility. It has been over two hundred years since Jane Austen wrote the novel Sense and Sensibility, yet to our surprise nothing has really changed. We still struggle to make the moral and ethical choices that people have struggled with over the years. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King Jr. broke unjust laws and engaged in nonviolence direct action in order to gain equality and freedom.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper examines Case 7 in our text “Is Birth Control Bad for One’s Health?”. This is quite an old case (1970), but nonetheless applicable in several ways to ethical and moral issues we face in today’s society. We will examine the original case and some of the applications to similar situations today. We also recognize that in today’s society, legal charges would likely be brought against the physician who acted in a similar manner as Dr. Browne.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The world consists of many ethical dilemmas that humans will encounter throughout their life. Unfortunately, these problems can lead to tough and stressful times. As an individual faces a dilemma, they will face it based on their view of life and how they make decisions. The outcomes and decisions of these dilemmas can change lives drastically. The paragraphs that follow describe an abortion ethical dilemma from the Christian worldview perspective.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We will now come to the implementation phase, as when utilizing the systems to make moral judgments about particular cases, it will be valuable to take after the procedure beneath. It becomes very important to Perceive an Ethical Issue, which is A standout amongst the most imperative things to do toward the start of moral thought is to situate, to the degree conceivable, the particularly moral parts of the current issue. Some of the time what gives off an impression of being a moral question is truly a debate about realities or ideas. For instance, a few Utilitarians may contend that capital punishment is moral since it prevents wrongdoing and along these lines delivers the best measure of good with the minimum damage. Different Utilitarians,…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When faced with an emergency either illness or injury going to the hospital becomes the only means of obtaining treatment. Imagine entering the hospital as a homeless person facing a life-threatening illness. After providing every treatment possible, it is certain there is no cure. Now assume a prominent politician in the same city has just been shot and rushed to the same hospital. This prominent leader faces certain death without a double organ transplant.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to a survey conducted by the Ecology Global Network, in the article “Birth and Death Rates,” it sates on average, 151,600 people die each day. In addition, an article by The American Transplant Foundation, titled “Facts and Myths,” states that at minimum, 21 people out of 123,000 men, women and children on the organ transplant list join the death rate every day. Incidentally, a single person can donate their body and save up to 8 lives. Thus if 20,000 of the 151,600 deceased donated their body, less people in need of a transplant would die. Instead, out of 151,600 deaths only a little over 8,500 deceased were donated.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first Dilemma is The Runaway Trolley. In short, The Runaway Trolley deals with a complex situation where Molly needs to push a stranger onto the tracks to prevent the trolley from killing five workmen. If she does not push the stranger the five workers will die. According to the Utilitarianism, a philosophical school of thought, Molly should push the stranger onto the tracks to save the five workers. Utilitarianism would argue that five lives is greater than one.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Trolley Dilemma

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages

    During the evaluation of four articles that focus on self-regulation, anxiety, and fear effecting consciousness and moral responsibility, the different author’s present their arguments and views on how these emotional capacities and the ability to obtain self-regulation affect the decision making of an agent and whether or not they should be held fully morally responsible for their actions and decisions. In this paper, I will be explicating three different views on the capacities of self-regulation, anxiety, and fear on moral responsibility among children, individuals in the workplace, and psychopaths. I will then bring forth another view on how anxiety affects an individual’s view on the “trolley dilemma”. To begin, I will discuss…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, saving multiple people with the organs of one person is the most ethical decision, since we save the most possible amount of people. He would argue that since we can use about twenty-five organs for transplant from each person that we would kill to save people, it is right to do. By extrapolation, eventually restoring twenty-five people to full health will outweigh the consequences of killing one person, despite what that one person’s life is worth overall. Most would agree that two hundred and fifty lives are more valuable than ten lives, despite whoever those ten are. This is not necessarily to say that each of those lives are equal in value; however it is very hard to argue against the fact that it is mathematically likely for two hundred and fifty people to have a greater impact on the earth than ten people, even if those ten people’s lives are worth more individually than the lives of the two hundred and…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernard Williams’s example of the moral dilemma involving Jim killing the one individual to save 19 is an interesting one that provokes much thought and it is a decision that utilitarian followers would find quite easy. Utilitarian’s subscribe to the view that everything that you do or do not do should be for the sake of maximizing total happiness, or utility. But individuals who subscribe to a different moral philosophy could potentially have a myriad of ethical concerns associated with making such a decision. In this paper, I will explain the moral dilemma that is presented in Bernard Williams’s piece, hypothesize what the utilitarian would do in that situation, why they would choose to do that. I will also demonstrate why Williams’s dilemma provides valid evidence to reject utilitarianism on the grounds that it weakens a person’s integrity, sense of responsibility, and their moral character.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent events, James Liang, an employee of 30 years for Volkswagen, came forward admitting to using software to deceive emissions tests in the United States for Volkswagen’s diesel engines. The engines, on average, produce 40 times the legal limits on emissions. After undergoing investigation, it was found that Volkswagen had been involved in this scandal since 2006. In response to public outcry the company has recalled all models using this engine and set aside 16 billion dollars to fix their mistake. However, for Liang after admitting his guilt, he intends to help bring others responsible for the scandal to light.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays