Deception In Milgram Experiment

Improved Essays
Deception is used in Milgram experiment which raises the question of validity and reliability. Connolly, (2011), infers that deception was used to safeguard the true nature of the study. Clearly we know that deception was used in the expense of getting results. For example, the participants were led to believe that they are administering real electric shock and were unaware that the learner was a confederate of Milgram. However, Milgram (1974) insisted that the deception was absolutely essential or the experiment would be worthless had the subjects understood what was really happening. But is this sufficient justification to allow the use of deception? According to Herrera (2001) some psychologists argue that there is nothing very underhand

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second chapter focuses on Stanley Milgram and his controversial experiments on obedience. The first part of the chapter focuses on how Milgram’s experiments involved random volunteers and a few actors. The experiments involved being strapped into an electric chair while another volunteer went into another room filled with a generator and voltage options. If the person strapped into the electric chair fails to answer questions about word association correctly, the other volunteer had to shock them with increasing voltage levels for every subsequent question that was answered incorrectly. They were also instructed not to stop shocking, despite the pleas from the other volunteer.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The psychological testing that took place in the Milgram experiment was interesting to me. Even though I had learned about the experiment in previous courses, I had never seen actual footage from the testing. The most disturbing moment of the video was when one “teacher” was obviously in disagreement about administering the shocks, but continued…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obedience to Authority Experiment In 1963 at Yale University, Stanley Milgram held an experiment to test the relationship between obedience to authority and the personal conscience. Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiment was one of the many experiments that caused the gathering of the APA, because of its lack of ethics and an analysis of the experiment provides information that could justify for the genocide acts of World War II. The experiment included 40 male participants who drew straws which determined whether they were the learner or the experimenter. Only this was rigged so that the participant was always the experimenter instead of it being random and thinking they had a choice. They were also introduced to Milgram who was head of this experiment.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While Baumrind strongly persuades the objective that the subjects deserved to understand the experiment's motives beforehand, Milgram's results compel that the subjects needed to be blind to the experiment in order to collect effective…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Stanford Experiment During the Milgram and Stanford experiment, each person had a special role. When given a role, people try their best to fulfill their duties no matter what is required of them. These experiments aim to understand how far someone will go to obey their superiors and follow instructions. You were either a prisoner, guard, teacher, or a learner. Each and every one of these participants were influenced into having demand characteristics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The learner was ordered to scream evidently loud so the teacher will have a feeling of uneasiness. Surprisingly, Stanley Milgrams prediction of how all his volunteers would disobey the experiment was unbiased and proven…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the questionnaire Milgram sent to the participants, 84% said they were pleased that they had participated in the experiment, roughly 15% were neither pleased nor regretful, and approximately 1% of participants regretted their involvement (Baumrind 95). With these results, Milgram would also likely refute Baumrind’s claims by retorting that either the experiment was not emotionally damaging in the first place, or that the reconciliation he arranged between the participant and actor was sufficient to alleviate the emotional damage. Based on his article “Experimental Ethics,” Ph.D. Alan C. Elms would agree with Milgram, and claims the additional measures Milgram took to ensure the participants’ welfare were unprecedented in most other psychological experiments: Milgram arranged for a psychiatrist to meet with the participants a year later, and no signs of harm were reported (Elms). If Baumrind’s claim that Milgram’s efforts to alleviate emotional damage were not sufficient, then the survey Milgram sent to participants would reveal that a significantly larger percentage of participants regretted their involvement; however, the results prove otherwise, rendering Baumrind’s argument invalid and therefore ineffective while Milgram’s claims are effective with Elms and the survey results supporting his…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This Code of Conduct established by the American Psychological Association effectively supports Baumrind by articulating how psychologists should aspire to create trusting relations with people whom they work (“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”). Milgram might refute these criticisms by claiming the subjects could trust the experimenter on the basis that he, the experimenter, was accountable for any harm caused by the subject. Milgram mentions this detail numerous times throughout his narratives of the experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgram 81, 83). In response to Milgram’s refute, Baumrind would likely debate how Milgram deceived his subjects about the purpose of the experiment. Milgram compelled his subjects to believe that they were not the focal point of the experiment but rather a supplementary aspect (Milgram 78).…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Now in the 21st century we as a people have different perspectives over events that have happen in the past. There are different studies and research qualities that go deeper into the meaning of why certain events have happened in the past. Just so that we can have an understanding of why it happened and what can we do to learn from it and in a sense never to let it happen again. Events such as slavery, the Trail of Tears, and for this specific paper the Holocaust. This is why social psychology and the many studies over experiments are extremely important to educators and psychologists.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays