Decentralization Of The Majority Analysis

Improved Essays
America covers an enormous amount of land, which makes it hard for both the government and the majority to communicate. This decentralization of the majority in America tempers their progress in gaining what they want on a national level. At a local level, the majority is more attuned to gaining what they want, whereas on a national level, “it cannot make all citizens in all places, in the same manner, at the same moment, bend to its desires” (1.2.8.250). The majority is powerful, but due to its lack of centralization and communication among each other across the United States, it is near impossible for everyone to demand the same thing at the same time. The majority continues to grow over time and become more powerful, but Tocqueville incites

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Great Seal Analysis

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the new governments by the states, the most important layer became, just like in The Great Seal’s pyramid, not the top but the bottom. “By throwing off monarchy and becoming republicans in 1776, Americans offered a different concept of what people were like and new ways of organizing both the state and the society.” (93) With power held in the lowermost layer of society, there needed to be a way to ensure the power stayed in that location. To make this happen Americans adopted Montesquieu’s doctrine of separation of powers. Despite the separation of powers doctrine, most state constitution further felt the need to establish a weak executive.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Super Majority

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Discuss the ways in which the American government requires a “super majority”. A super majority vote is a vote that must exceed the number of votes made for a simple majority. One way to put it is that if there is a 100 members of congress, the vote required to when the super majority is 51. Super majority votes are most often applied to legislation that is dealing with the federal budget or taxation.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dahl examines the performance of the American constitutional arrangement by comparing it to other democracies. Subsequently, Dahl examines the link between political equality and political democracy and rejects Tocqueville’s argument because the pattern of democratic development contradicts his assertion. Dahl concludes, with the idea that…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hyperpluralism Analysis

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Madison, factions are special interests groups that overlook the interests of others to fulfill their own selfish interests. Madison believes that factions are one of the biggest things that weakens our government. Naturally as human beings we all have different ideas based on how we were raised or what we cultured/conditioned to believe. According to Madison, factions are not a good thing, but unfortunately they are inevitable. He says there are two things that can be done, one being to control the source or two control the effect of faction.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A simple fact of nature for humans is their desire to compete and win, the true can be said for minority and majority groups. James Madison foresaw this problem when writing Federalist 10. He discusses the problems with factions and their threat they posed to the new government, as well as the naturally ambitious nature of humans and how that can be used to control power. Lastly, Madison claims that pluralism and the ambition of people are the solution to factions. The Madisonian majority is the idea of small factions, groups of either minority or majority looking to bend public interests in their favor.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are often treated or judged in a manner that is less than equal before people know the true nature of the person. For us, judgement is an instinct, we use it to make assumptions of what is safe, right, and wrong. Judgement is the ability to make considered decisions or come to sensible conclusions. Throughout The Scarlet Letter, judgement is displayed quite often. Hester Prynne, the main character in The Scarlet Letter, commits a sin that is heavily looked down upon, and she is forced to adjust to her new life of constant judgement and ridicule.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword Seymour M. Lipset American Exceptionalism: A Double-Edged Sword is a well-known piece of work that has significantly contributed to the study of American politics. Although the concept of American exceptionalism has been introduced since the beginning of Alexander de Tocqueville’s time, Seymour M. Lipset takes this research further by analyzing American exceptionalism with greater depth. As a scholar with great reputation, Seymour M. Lipset provides more insights that could aid the study of American politics. He observes the deeply held inarticulated beliefs that shape America’s society and thought. Generally, he describes American exceptionalism as qualitatively different from those of other…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mohammad Shakhwar HIS-103-11651 Professor Cory Davis When you look at what is happening in American politics today, you hear all the time that politics has never been so divisive. That we as a nation are more divided than ever. This may be true, however there has always been a deep divide in the country going all the way back to the nation’s founding.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The design of two houses making up Congress allows the wants of the people to never be settled, because neither side can reach an agreement. The founding fathers’ intentions for Congress to be a government in which the people are represented and heard clearly failed due to the never-ending cycle of The Washington Establishment, the most prominent evidence of a broken government. No government is perfect; however, America should set an example to other countries as one with a government that truly represents its constituents, not as one with a broken…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Majoritarianism Analysis

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Majoritarianism In the Context of British Politics In a nutshell, majoritarian politics is democracy taken to a more extreme level. Majoritarian governments are designed to favor the ideas of the ruling majority, as well as pass legislation based on the views of that group. The government of the United Kingdom has historically been majoritarian; utilizing a system built on fast and simple decision-making. In accordance with its historical roots, can the same tenets of majoritarianism be observed in the modern-day government of the United Kingdom?…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays