Death Penalty In Canada

Improved Essays
Are countries eligible to deprive personal right of life by social contract? Capital punishment, which is the punishment by death, has been practiced by many countries and cultures since the beginning of human history. That means capital punishment is the oldest and the most serious penalty for human beings. However, there are over two thirds of countries have abolished death penalty in law and in reality up to 2009. Canada is one of them, but some Canadians think capital punishment should be reinstated to Canada again. This essay would discus abolition of capital punishment is a good thing for Canada. Canadians should consider about some aspects before they want to reintroduce the death penalty: wrongful conviction, public opinions and economic …show more content…
However, some people also argue that abolition of capital punishment is a Running head: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 5 terrible thing for Canada. First, it is often thought that capital punishment can act as a significant intimidation to decrease the criminal rate of Canada. In fact, it is completely wrong because Canada’s criminal rate has been declined since 1976 (the year of abolition of death penalty of Canada). Besides, the intimidation is under or only exists on the assumption of the criminals’ rationality, yet most criminals are doing wrong things due to passionate impulse. And do the murderers do not know the consequences of murder? If murderers know the death penalty to crime and still keep doing that, that means the death penalty is not an effective way to deterrent them; if murderers do not know that they will be sentenced to death after committing crimes, it means that the death penalty does not achieve as the desired effect. Amnesty international (2000) has declared that there is no clear evidence to show the death penalty can reduce the criminal rate. As a result, the intimidation effect of death penalty is useless to avoid the increasing criminal rate. Additionally, some people also note that the retaliation is not a negligible moral issue on the capital punishment. It cannot be denied that revenge is the intrinsic characteristic of human, and capital punishment is a way to comfort the families of the victims. However, it does not have any substantial compensation effects to the relatives of the victims and society instead of just to satisfy the momentary pleasure. For instance, “Oshea and Mary”, when Oshea was a teenager, he shot and killed Mary’s only son, Laramiun Byrd, in a gang fight. A dozen years later, Mary went to prison to meet Oshea and found out who

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tess Hutchinson Crimes

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    There is no connection to Tessie Hutchinson and the individuals sentenced to capital punishment; however, a link between these suspects and the villagers in The Lottery exist. For a convicted criminal who is condemned to capital punishment, they have committed a major offense and endangered people within their community. The villagers are also members of these acts because they are taking innocent lives; as well as, putting more people of their community in danger by continuing the lottery each year. As stated previously, by implementing capital punishment into the American system, we continue to deter a copious amount of homicides.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On December 11th, 1962 the last two people were executed under Canadian law. Two men were hanged, which was the only method of capital punishment enforced in Canadian history (Setaram, 2015). One of the men, named Ronald Turpin, was convicted of killing a cop. The other, named Arthur Lucas, was convicted for murder. After these two trials in 1976, capital punishment was abolished.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in a civic view, it does not rely on anybody the right to take other people’s lives. Several countries and states throughout the United Sates, which have abolished capital punishment, noticed a subsequent decrease on what is called murder. In other words, the intention of capital punishment is to lower the murder rates, however, what it truly does is increasing it, leading capital punishment laws to a failure law enforcement. For example, in 1976, before capital punishment was abolished, three homicides were committed per 100,000 people in Canada. After the death penalty was abolished, 1.85 murders per 100,000 people in 2003.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ambiguity of Capital Punishment Punishment has always and continues to be a corrective plan of action for violations that range from a minor assault to murder. In the case of capital punishment – a process of sentencing convicted offenders to death for the most serious crimes (capital crimes)(bsj.gov), punishment for such crimes can range from lengthy prison time to death penalty sentencing. The citing below will delve into the justification or lack thereof on how this kind of punishment is administered through the justice systems in states that carry out death penalties. Lewis E Laws gives a personal account of his over 20 years of experience and observations of murderers in questioning the consistency of the law as it relates to the morphing…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The discussion organized into six different issues; deterrence, incapacitation, caprice and bias, cost, innocence, and retribution, portrays thoughts and research that has both opposed and supported capital punishment in the last twenty-five years. In turn, the three-major observations that were derived from this discussion include first, significant changes death penalty debates throughout the years, second, an accelerated worldwide decline in the acceptance of capital punishment, and lastly, sending a positive message of encouragement to criminologists who feel their research doesn’t do much to persuade both public and policy makers (Radelet & Borg, 2000). Just how this review suggests, I believe that as individuals become more informed about the current research done on the effects of capital punishment we will see a major decline on pro capital punishment social norms on a worldwide…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the twenty first century there has been a considerable amount of discussion debating whether or not the death penalty, the act of sentencing someone to death as punishment for a crime, should be re-introduced into Australia’s modern society. In these disputes people attempt to argue that the death penalty should be brought back as it is a deterrent against crime, however evidence proves that the death penalty should not be reintroduced into Australias society as it is cruel and inhumane Such evidence is outlined in the history of the death penalty, in the rise of executions of our neighbouring countries which still up hold the death penalty and even in the many cases where people have had the human rights violated and have been falsely accused…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, many countries have yet to be convinced and continue to use this ultimate retribution. Perhaps understanding just what capital punishment is, how it affects the inmates, why capital punishment should be abolished might lead to a reconsideration of this practice. 1. What is the death penalty and how can we understand it? 2.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every person is born with the essential right to live therefore, no one has the right to take their life away from them. Our society believes that if someone has taken the life of another human being, that they should have their life taken away from them as well. If society continues this cycle, the ever growing rate of murder will never end. The death penalty should not exist in America today. In Hugo Adam Bedau’s essay “An Abolitionist's Survey of the Death Penalty in America Today” he focuses on attacking the death penalty.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While the societal pendulum swings from keeping the death penalty to abolishing it, one thing is for certain; a light has been shined on the cost of the death penalty and the reflection of its effectiveness is shining through. These numbers are just a few statistics that show how much the death penalty is costing the hard working men and women of this…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays