The Lethal Injection Methods Of The Death Penalty

Great Essays
Death Penalty is a punishment of execution, given to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Treason and first degree murder falls under capital crime. There are five methods of execution: Lethal injection, electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging. The lethal injection method is used when they bound the person to a gurney and inject a saline solution, sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride. Electrocution method uses a chair and the person is strapped to it. They usually have to shave their heads and legs. A metal cap is placed on the skull, and moistened with saline over the forehead. The sponge must not get too not too dry for it would have a high resistance, or too wet because short-circuits the electric …show more content…
The firing squad method the inmate is strapped to a chair and in front of a canvas wall. A black hood is coving the inmates face, the doctor locates the heart and puts a white cloth over it. Five shooters are armed with .30 caliber rifles, one of the shooters is given black rounds. Each of the shooters fires through a slot in the canvas and fires at the inmate. Hanging is the primary method in the United States. Before the execution, the inmate is weighed before the hanging and determine the length of the rope so it can kill the criminal fast and swift. The prisoner’s hands and legs are tied together and he/she has a black hood over their head and the noose is placed around the neck. The inmate stands over a trapped door, the prisoner falls through and snaps his/her neck. These are the five ways the government puts someone to death. Death penalty is an ethics topic because it is inhumane to kill another human being, but it is also inhuman to slaughter another or many others. Both are morally right, but society says we should keep the safety and welfare of the …show more content…
The death penalty helps the families of the victim, and/or the victim too, get closure and they can move on. Retribution is the strongest argument for the capital punishment. "Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sentence must be less deterrent than a death sentence. And we must execute murderers as long as it is merely possible that their execution protects citizens from future murder" (Haag 2005). Most criminals and murderers are afraid of at least one very thing and that is death. They had their chance to contribute with society but they only wanted to destroy parts of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life. Fear of being robbed, raped and murdered. In societies that have abolished the death penalty, prison cells are overcrowded and many of them are repeated offenders who, despite their incarceration are still actively involved in orchestrating criminal offences. Therefore, it means that imprisonment is not as effective as it ought to be.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A black hood was then placed over the criminal’s head. The executioners would lay sandbags around the criminal, so they would absorb the criminals lost blood. After the preparation was done, the executioners stood twenty feet away with .30 calibers and shot the criminal to death. The criminal would suffer from losing tremendous amounts of blood (“Firing Squad”). Many different methods of execution have been used as capital punishment; five common methods include hanging, electrocution, gas chamber, lethal injection, and firing squad.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals don’t deserve a punishment that effects everyone around them. They deserve to sit in prison for life. They shouldn’t be put to death that’s an easy way out. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because it violates human rights, it is highly expensive, and it has systematic problems. Those who approve the death penalty believe that it brings justice to the victims’ families and they see it as an “eye for an eye” revenge.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overcrowded Prisons

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With that being said the real criminal can be brought to justice so the victim and the victim’s family can have it too. Many families of the victim argue against the death penalty because they do not agree with it. I believe however that they should face the death penalty, but that is not how things should work out. Just because one person wants it does not mean that it should happen. If the judge gives the criminal the death sentence the family of the victim should be able to decide whether they would like that or life imprisonment.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He becomes a big supporter of the death penalty which is dominant in his paper where he list different objections to the death penalty than counteracts them. Koch starts off by saying that the death penalty is simply barbaric. The action itself is not barbaric due to its purpose of killing without suffering. A down side of killing people is you cannot take the death penalty back. Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Against Death Penalty

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should the death penalty be abolished? The answer is a resonating, no. I say this because even though the death penalty in my mind is against what I believe about not killing humans, we have human killing other humans. So with that there must be a punishment that can help deter the murderers of this world not to kill. That is exactly what the death penalty does it helps deter someone from killing another person by threatening their own life by capital punishment.…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jesus Hernandez Is it acceptable in any case to kill a possible innocent human? Capital Punishment is the sentencing of a man or woman to death instead of him or her serving time in a penitentiary for committing a serious crime like murder. This is an issue everyone should be concerned about because taking away someone’s life is serious and cannot be undone. This issue cannot be focused on by only the government because the citizens need to know how it is affecting them as well. Families could lose loved ones due to a death sentence, and the taxpayers have to pay out of their own pockets for the cost of the execution.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But it’s hard times like these that when victims must ask themselves “Is it worth it?” or “Is this what my loved one would want?” Every time the death penalty is ordered upon somebody, the ones who have to carry the procedure out are also human and one must wonder about the toll its taking on the humanity of that person. Furthermore how humane is this punishment? Who are we as humans to take another person’s life as punishment for their crimes? A life sentence in prison would be the more humane and more intense punishment rather than death since they’ll be isolated from the general public. Also, we should also remember the eighth amendment as it says that cruel and unusual punishment should not be dealt to…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many judge believe that if they sentence a person to the death penalty, it will cut down the crime rate in the world. According to Amnesty USA, the murder rate in the states that does not use the death penalty has remained lower than the rate in the states that continue to use the death penalty (Amnesty). However, the death penalty gives the victim’s family a piece of mind. Only because it is an exchange of the crime that prisoner committed. The family will have the assurance that they can gain revenge through the pain and suffering that they experienced, which is the loss of one of their family members.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays