As population of the world is increasing, the rate of the crimes is increasing also. Many people who commit some huge crimes; for example, murder, rape ,and manslaughter usually receive the to death penalty. However, there are some crimes that should receive death penalty because it was for a good purpose. For example, protect a woman from getting harassed or stopping a robbery these kind of crime should be stopped some of them can be extremely dangerous for the both which can end their lives.There is many ways to execute the death penalty; however, the most common execution is by hanging the criminal with a rope. Moreover, the judgment is not in the judge 's hand it 's the jury choice to make. I think that death penalty shouldn 't be allowed
…show more content…
Every person has only one life to live, so if the jury made a mistake in their judgment, and accused the wrong person for a crime that he didn 't execute it will be the biggest mistake that the jury will ever make because they took an innocent soul. The human soul is sacred; moreover, taking the human soul is forbidden. Moreover, accusing the wrong person will not prevent the crime, it will increase because the real criminal is on a loose. Furthermore, their crimes that the death penalty should not be carried out like self protect, which while protecting yourself you accidentally kill the other person or while driving an animal start running in front of the car and you try to avoid it from killing it however, while avoiding it you steer the car to avoid the animal but the car is going towards a person and kills the him or her. These kind of accidentally don 't deserve the rule and the judgment of death penalty. People go to jury because they want justice; however, where’s justice if they took an innocent human? According to Feingold that ‘‘that is a demonstrated error rate of 1 innocent person for every 7 persons executed ' '(Feingold, 2000). Some people think that it’s acceptable to allow death penalty. Furthermore, some people believe that it will free the world from evil people, and make the world a better place to live in. It may free the world from sinful people; however, not every person who has been sent
Every person has only one life to live, so if the jury made a mistake in their judgment, and accused the wrong person for a crime that he didn 't execute it will be the biggest mistake that the jury will ever make because they took an innocent soul. The human soul is sacred; moreover, taking the human soul is forbidden. Moreover, accusing the wrong person will not prevent the crime, it will increase because the real criminal is on a loose. Furthermore, their crimes that the death penalty should not be carried out like self protect, which while protecting yourself you accidentally kill the other person or while driving an animal start running in front of the car and you try to avoid it from killing it however, while avoiding it you steer the car to avoid the animal but the car is going towards a person and kills the him or her. These kind of accidentally don 't deserve the rule and the judgment of death penalty. People go to jury because they want justice; however, where’s justice if they took an innocent human? According to Feingold that ‘‘that is a demonstrated error rate of 1 innocent person for every 7 persons executed ' '(Feingold, 2000). Some people think that it’s acceptable to allow death penalty. Furthermore, some people believe that it will free the world from evil people, and make the world a better place to live in. It may free the world from sinful people; however, not every person who has been sent