Death Penalty: Inhumane Or Necessary Deterrent Analysis

Improved Essays
In the article “Death Penalty: Inhumane or Necessary Deterrent?” written by Euan McKirdy, several concepts surrounding the death penalty are discussed. McKirdy is a Digital News Producer who joined CNN in early 2014 and covers everything from politics, tech and the environment to sport and the arts. Before McKirdy started writing for CNN he wrote for a different publications and websites including Time, the BBC, the Wall Street Journal and Monocle. Throughout the article, McKirdy displays information for both sides of the controversial argument. He writes: Advocates say it is a powerful deterrent against serious crime, while others point to the problems -- and cost -- of keeping violent offenders in general prison populations. In many countries, …show more content…
Creative ideas, such as using different methods for executions are now becoming part of the plan. “While the 31 states with death penalty laws use lethal injection drugs as the main method for executions, some of them have options,” explains Chavez. For example, some states have the option of the gas chamber, hanging, electric chair, or firing squad. On the opposing side, critics of the death penalty claim that when the drug expires it is a great time to cease the use of the death penalty. “Death sentences are still being handed down, but many states are not scheduling executions because authorities don't have the drugs needed for lethal injection. And pharmaceutical companies are now mounting legal challenges against the use of their products in executions, so Arkansas could fall into a years-long, expensive battle with those companies,” concludes Chavez. However, as previously mentioned Arkansas executed several prisoners with no complications.
In the article “The Death Penalty and the Fifth Amendment” written by Joseph Blocher, several concepts that surround the death penalty and its relation to the Fifth Amendment are discussed. Blocher is a law professor at Duke University. His academic interests include constitutional law, the First and Second Amendments, capital punishment, and property

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty has caused tension between more than just those who enforce it and those who receive it. The shock waves caused by the death penalty can be found building tension within the conversations of those who may not have a true role in the process but who, in the eyes of the American democracy, have a voice on the matter. As an observer of the current and past status of the death penalty, one can form the opinion and understanding the necessity of capital punishment in the form of the death penalty. The death penalty has been apart of the court rulings since its reinstatement in 1988. Although those who are against the death penalty would argue that each one of these deaths were not necessary to the safety of our nation..…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Death of the Death Penalty”, David Von Drehle states that the death penalty is becoming less common and should now just be abolished because of the cost and time that it takes. Drehles article was published in Time Magazine. He concludes that the death penalty has become unnecessary and doesn’t work anymore. The crime rate in the United States has declined so much that in the past decade even though there are hundreds of people under the death penalty. This statement is making people believe that there is no reason to keep the death penalty in our society.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Debate: Should America Have Capital Punishment? “For centuries the death penalty, often accompanied by barbarous refinements, has been trying to hold crime in check; yet crime persists. Why? Because the instincts that are warring in man are not, as the law claims, constant forces in a state of equilibrium” (Camus). In America, capital punishment has been a growing issue; it continues to be in the news when a high profile case comes up, or when laws on capital punishment are argued in court.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Texas has executed the total of 529 criminals (DPIC 1). Although death penalty is one of the solutions for crimes, there are some opinions debate that this punishment is cruel and immoral. The first one approve death penalty as the method to secure others’ lives, to put an end to a threat, and…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Capital punishment has been a topic of much debate for many years with very differing points of view. Much of the research done about capital punishment is based on the public opinions, making it an issue close to peoples morals and idealistic thought. The news media then caters to the leaning of the public’s morals. In dealing with capital punishment, the news media tends to focus on three different popular mentalities; the ‘eye for an eye’ mentality, punishment should fit the crime mentality, and the declaring it inhumane treatment of individuals mentality. By focusing on these three views, the media has been able to help inform the public according to the prevailing view of the individual case.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Death Penalty Focus, the lethal injection is the practice of killing a person using a lethal dose of drugs administrated intravenously, meaning through or within a vein. The history of lethal injections states that physicians in Nazi Germany initially used them in the course of the Nazi euthanasia program against the physically and intellectual disabled children and adults in the late 1930’s and early 1940’s. Many thought that the use of the lethal injection would cause less pain for the inmates, but that’s not the case. The lethal injection, if not given correctly, could cause severe…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Death Penalty: The Price Society Pays The death penalty has been a topic of controversy for centuries, known for its inhumane brutality methods which have evolved over the years from lynching to gassing, electrocuting and now the lethal injection; it is in fact the sentencing of those who have committed a heinous crime. On the other hand, justice has been served when the death penalty has finally been executed on the prisoner, bringing a sense of retribution to those who have lost a loved one due to the crime committed. Although many people might think it is a working system, others land in the mixture of controversy for various reasons. Over the course of time, the death penalty has started to become obsolete and is slowly making a turnover…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a very controversial topic. In this paper I am going to be talking about the conflicts between liberty and security in the death penalty. Liberty can be defined by the dictionary as, “the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one 's way of life, behavior, or political views” and security, by Policy Paradox definition, means “an ideal of perfect safety and the guaranteed absence of bad things and, therefore, a total lack of worry”. Now the questions become, should people be allowed to take someone’s life in the name of the law, or is this refutable justice on the criminals?…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Participation of physicians in state-ordered executions has become controversial especially in the medical ethics in the US. For the last twenty years, the use of lethal injection has been the main method of execution and capital punishment. In the past executioners used were firing squads, electrocution, hanging, and gas asphyxiation in addition to lethal injection (Gawande 131-34). The lethal injection is the widely preferred method by courts as the most humane, which does not contravene the eighth amendment provisions acting against cruel death and inhumane forms of punishment. Medical knowledge is vital in the execution through lethal injections to ensure the correct effective application of the procedure.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unjust Death Penalty

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Because of different legal issues surrounding the state’s lethal injection procedures, executions have not taken place since 2006” (California). Ever since this complication, the execution process never restarted. Meanwhile, California’s death row is the largest in the country and continues to grow causing further problems regarding the death penalty system. Convicts are on death row for far too long before any action towards the execution actually occurs, showing that this bill should be passed to solve this relevant…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty, often known as capital punishment, is the punishment of execution given to a person who has been legally convicted of a crime. It has been a highly controversial issue, and there are many American citizens who support this system, and many who do not. Some argue that the criminals who have been sentenced to death deserve to die, to pay for the harm that they have done to others. They also view execution as a deterrent for crime. However, the system has not been successful in reducing crime in our society, and I do not see how it will do so in the future.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They assert that the real question concerning the death penalty is the issue of whether capital punishment can be administered in an acceptable way, not if the death penalty is moral or not. Ultimately, it is evident that Putnam and Reams defend the New Hampshire statutes of the death penalty. Yet, they acknowledge that it is up to the people of New Hampshire to decide on the decency of…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Mulhausen) Making Midazolam illegal will draw many people’s attention in letting them know what could go wrong with this penalty. (npr.org) They say, the lethal injection is known in more cases than none, to cause suffering more than the other methods used. (npr.org) Many people don’t believe excutition should be the answer to people that have made a mistake, but in fact, think they should suffer and pay for their mistake in a cell.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of capital punishment in the United States has been consistently controversial since our foundation, and even more so since the founding of the American Abolitionist Movement. The death penalty has been argued as a deterrent and a facet for retributive aggression and justice through punishment, bringing those who experienced tragedy closer to emotional stability. It has also been argued that it constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” under the U.S. constitution and has been abolished in 19 states and the District of Columbia. Ultimately, the question that needs to be addressed for a definitive answer to be found is whether or not the death penalty constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” for the stage of progression we have reached socially based on the evolution of our morality. Historically, we have a disposition towards violent behaviour, especially when inequity is attached to it.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays