Death Penalty: Most Debatable Topics In The Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
The Death Penalty is one of the most debatable topics in the criminal justice system. Three reasons the Death Penalty is a good way to handle severe crimes are that it deters people from committing the more severe crimes, it provides closure for victims, and the death penalty is necessary to protect society.

First and foremost, deterrence works by letting possible murderers know that if they are found guilty of certain crimes, then they could pay the ultimate price. If as a society, people don’t have severe penalties and the repercussions in place, people are more likely to commit unthinkable acts. Obviously, having the death penalty in place will not affect every potential murderer, but if it deters even one individual from committing a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    On December 11th, 1962 the last two people were executed under Canadian law. Two men were hanged, which was the only method of capital punishment enforced in Canadian history (Setaram, 2015). One of the men, named Ronald Turpin, was convicted of killing a cop. The other, named Arthur Lucas, was convicted for murder. After these two trials in 1976, capital punishment was abolished.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article Summary #1: Author William Tucker uses his 2000 American Spectator article to explain why the death penalty is actually a deterrent to criminals. Tucker analyzes the statistics of crime over the years and concludes that when death penalty rates are up, murder rates are down, and when execution rates decrease, the rate of homicides rises (par. 13). While many criminologists believe that the death penalty doesn’t affect the amount of murders that take place in America, Tucker counters by saying, “The results are plain to see. Beginning at almost the exact point when executions ended, murder soared to unprecedented heights.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution, we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haag, a sociologist, wrote an extensive explanation on why the death penalty would help deter criminals from committing crimes. He has stated that the death penalty may be the only way to keep some people from committing crimes. He has said that this will help reduce the number of victims to crimes such as murder and rape. Haag also feels that if the punishments for a crime is raised then the desire to commit a crime is quickly diminished. I agree with Haag.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many argue that the Death penalty functions as a specific and general deterrence in society. For instance, general deterrence aims to make the individual aware of similar consequences occurring if he or she were to commit a similar offense (Fuller 2014, 20). Whereas, specific deterrence focuses on preventing the perpetrator itself from recidivating, due to understanding the consequences of having that behavior (Fuller 2014, 20). It is argued that one fears death and would rather face a life sentence in prison than Capital punishment. This allegedly is the reason why those who deviate lessen the severity of their offense to avoid the Death penalty.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Death Penalty: Inhumane or Necessary Deterrent?” written by Euan McKirdy, several concepts surrounding the death penalty are discussed. McKirdy is a Digital News Producer who joined CNN in early 2014 and covers everything from politics, tech and the environment to sport and the arts. Before McKirdy started writing for CNN he wrote for a different publications and websites including Time, the BBC, the Wall Street Journal and Monocle. Throughout the article, McKirdy displays information for both sides of the controversial argument. He writes: Advocates say it is a powerful deterrent against serious crime, while others point to the problems -- and cost -- of keeping violent offenders in general prison populations.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sentenced Sentenced to death. Many criminals in our country receive the controversial sentencing of the capital punishment. While the argument can go both directions, In the United states the death penalty should be abolished because it is a violation of the constitution, is a waste of time and lacks deterrence. The death penalty is in many opinions a violation of the constitution.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whilst some think that the death penalty is a fair sanction, it is an inequitable penance because many convicts on death row suffered from prejudiced trials, were mentally-ill, or were wrongfully accused. There have been hundreds of unjustified deaths from the death penalty. In conclusion, the death sentence is an unnecessary form of punishment that advocates the obliteration of human life. There is no proof whatsoever that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why the Death Penalty is Infallibly Superfluous Many philosophers endorse the death penalty since it “serves as justice” when a serious crime is committed. Many retributivist and consequentialist believe that wrongdoers should be subjected to the death penalty if they commit crimes of the highest degree such as murder, terrorism, etc. Many Philosophers also believe that the death penalty can deter and prevent However, this belief is deeply flawed, as the death penalty fails not only philosophically, but also statistically. The death penalty is not only unnecessary, but also immoral being that it de-humanizes people with an extreme degree, does not generate enough intrinsic value to succeed that of life imprisonment, and does not deter, or prevent horrendous crimes.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Ann O’M. Bowman and Richard C. Kearney, the controversy over the death penalty is due to the “uninformed” people who believe that the perfect punishment for criminals is the execution, and the “informed” people who believe that a punishment must act as a deterrent arguing that execution is not a deterrent for criminals. In my opinion, death penalty can be a solution to end with rape and murder. But this solution could only work if we had a fair and honest legal system. And as human beings, is in our nature to involve feelings in our decisions that imply not always doing the right thing.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Dilemmas

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Death Penalty This time and day any controversial topic is a very sensitive topic to speak on. People are natural emotional creatures making it difficult to disagree or to have your own opinions. We are all so quick to blame society we forget society isn’t just one individual. Statements like “Society has taught us” “Society makes us believe” are statements heard on a daily basis.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justified Murder Essay

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It provides “the perfect punishment” for murderers, a life for a life. But punishment’s arguably most important purpose is to deter crime. Deterrence has the greatest effect on society as a whole (Winters 90). The death penalty it just that, the…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays