Death Penalty In Just Mercy By Bryan Stevenson

Improved Essays
The news Headlines today are blowing up with the craziest stories “Boy Charged with killing 8-year old girl over the argument about puppies” (ABC news). Kids are being convicted of murder and tried as adults but they are juveniles so the question is “What is the fine line between intentional and unintentional killing?” The difference between being tried as adult and being tried as a juvenile? How does the justice system treat those with mental disorders? In Just Mercy, written by Bryan Stevenson there were many cases of children committing crimes that involve murder and are sent to death row, or imprisonment without parole. When Charlie shot his mom’s drunk boyfriend he was using a self defense mechanism, because George, the drunk boyfriend

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Really, no one argues that those living in poverty hold a disadvantage. Not being in possession of any significant wealth makes for a much more difficult lifestyle: poor living conditions, less food, and lower social status. But technically, the poor ought to be equal to everyone else. After all, those with less money than others still remain citizens of the United States and human beings, right? However, Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson shows that your wealth greatly affects your treatment in the justice system.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile delinquents are being incarcerated and given the same punishment as adults are given, there are different factors to why this is a continuous problem. Recidivism rates, the mental capacity of juveniles, and the rights a juvenile hold are reason to why this is a problem. In the Atkins v Virginia case, the supreme court ruled the mentally retarded being sentenced the death penalty as unconstitutional and cruel and unusual punishment, under the eight amendment. In correlation to the Atkins v Virginia case, is the Roper v Simmons case. The Roper v Simmons case ruled the death penalty for juveniles as cruel and unusual punishment because a child under eighteen years old is not mentally developed yet, therefor they fall under the same consideration…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of our country’s namesakes is the “Home of the Free.” However, can we truly live up to the name? Since the American Revolution, the United States has made grand movements to ensure the rights of our citizens. The Civil Rights Movement and Marriage Equality have continued the ongoing battle of our rights, freedom, and equalization. Nonetheless, the United States has become known, globally, for its high incarceration rates as well as the controversial capital punishment.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Juveniles Be Sentenced to Life Without Parole? When adults commit crimes, they are held accountable; but what if a teenager or child commits the same crime? On June 25, 2012, a controversy heated in the Supreme Court between the majority and 4 judges. The majority of the judges believes that it shouldn’t be mandatory for juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole when they commit a heinous crime such as murder, while the other 4 judges oppose to that, saying it should be mandatory for juveniles to be sentenced to life without parole.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Kids Get Life Essay

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film When Kids Get Life presents the cases of five juveniles sentenced in Colorado to life in prison without the possibility of parole. This film explores whether juveniles should receive the types of sentences where there is no possibility of letting them out even if they changed or try to make up for anything they might’ve done. In the movie there are two major sides to this argument, one side being that they are the worst of the worst and they deserve what they got according to the family of the victims. The other side argues that the punishment is too harsh and that doesn't really represent what the defendants did but represents the revenge the victim’s family have. I agree with both arguments, but I lean more towards the argument of…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some people have different opinions and think that juveniles should be held accountable for their actions. Mary Onelia has written many articles for student newspaper at the university of California in San Diego. She argued in the article Juveniles Should Be Tried as Adults in Certain Circumstances, “if you do and adult crime, you do the adult time.” People forget about the victims. People worry about the offender but don’t realize what the victims is going through.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kids being held accountable as adults. Kids shouldn’t be accountable as adults because they are just kids, they’re are still learning and they don’t know what they are doing. Kids do not understand what they are doing, unlike adults, who know what they are doing. Therefore, kids are still kids, still learning the way of life, and shouldn’t be punished for simply having fun and being a kid. Kids don’t understand what they are doing.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles in American societies should encounter the responsibility and consequence of being tried as adults, despite their age, when committing unspeakable, heinous crimes. In Richard A. Serrano’s article, Young killers serving life without parole may get chance at freedom, he introduces reasons why it is acceptable for juveniles to be tried as adults. Seranno lists, seventeen-year-old Johnny Freeman “raped a five-year-old and tossed her from a fourteenth-story window,” sixteen-year-old Peter Saunders “bludgeoned an elderly woman, then from prison mailed a bomb-like device to a judge,” and sixteen-year-old David Biro “marched a husband and his pregnant wife down their basement stairs and shot them both” (Serrano, paragraph 12). Although…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Hypocritical

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing a juvenile life in prison without parole is depriving them of their rights and is clearly hypocritical. The minority who are pro sentencing them to life without parole don't take into consideration the possibility there is in enlightening these kids in becoming better citizens and learning from their mistakes. The reason why I consider the sentencing hypocritical is due to the way society treats juveniles and classifies them as “kids” until they commit a crime. I am in full agreement with the majority of Supreme Court ruling of abolishing mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murder. Many who oppose my vision on the topic, use claims such as, “they’re old enough to know better” or “a crime is a crime no matter age,” but…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a scenario where two family members or friends are killed. Justice should be given, correct? Now imagine it was a 15-year-old boy who committed the crime. Should he receive lax sentencing due to his age? , although he knew exactly what he was doing.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children ages fourteen or under should never be convicted as adults no matter the crime. One reason they shouldn’t be tried is because the child could have been abused or in any other way be neglected by a family member. This reason showed itself in a case in Alabama where Susan Ferriss writes “And if ever a pathological background might have contributed to a 14-year-old’s commission of a crime, it is here. Miller’s stepfather physically abused him, the ruling said, his alco­holic and drug-addicted mother neglected him; he had been in and out of foster care as a result; and he had tried to kill himself four times, the first when he should have been in kindergarten”(Ferriss). Adolescents can be physically and mentally abused causing them to act out irrationally.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One day, a little 15 year old boy was giving his little baby brother a bath. When he was washing his baby brother, he splashed hot water and soap in his eyes, and he got mad and grab his baby brother and drowned and killed him. There’s a debate, in the United States that how young teens, who commit felonies should be charged as adults do to this case. While some people believe that teens who commit felonies shouldn’t be charged as adults because they should be able to learn from their mistake and make better life choices , rather than teens who commit felonies should be charged as adults because they cannot make up for their mistake and they do not know what there are doing , most of them don’t know but some of them do .…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of juveniles being tried as adults in the world of criminal justice has usually been an object of controversy. Some agree that an adolescent who commits a serious crime like murder deserves to be penalized exactly like an adult; while others declare that a minor should not face the same punishment as an adult. However, no matter how severe or appalling a crime may be, juveniles should not be tried as adults; the reason being that everyone should be granted the chance to learn from their mistakes. Juveniles should not be punished as adults, simply because they biologically distinct from adults. Teenagers are the midsection between children and adults.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics