Death Penalty Controversy Essay

1409 Words 6 Pages
The Death Penalty Controversy May Be Easily Ended In the United States, the death penalty is used as the capital punishment. The Oxford Dictionary defines capital punishment as “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” Common counterarguments to abolishing the death penalty often say that it deters future crime and saves money. It is also said that the death penalty is a justified punishment for the most heinous of crime (Mulhausen). Another feat of keeping the death penalty is that it saves taxpayers money that would originally be spent towards the average $29,000 incarceration cost per prisoner each year (Federal Register). But with the death penalty, comes innocent incarceration, drastic mental tolls, and slow …show more content…
One might presume at this point that they find their situation to be hopeless.” Studies conducted by Harlow using monkeys in isolated solitary confinement, showed that it left the animals “profoundly disturbed.” The longest studies of twelve months of isolation “obliterated the animals socially” (Breslow). Most inmates on death row who are interviewed show explicit signs of obsession, depression, and suicidal thoughts (Holloway). Solitary confinement diminishes prisoner’s ability to initiate behavior and control their own lives. (Holloway).
As a prisoner approaches an execution date, they should now expect a malpractical use of lethal injection; leaving them suffering for hours. A recent case of this happened when “Arizona 's double-murderer Joseph Rudolph Wood III took about two hours to die. The specific problem this time around was an apparently unreliable ‘cocktail’ of the drugs used in the lethal injection process.” (Gillespie). Cases like these outline that the death penalty is far too barbaric and inhumane for today’s standards of justice.
With death row comes a rigorous mental syndrome and a long painful act of execution. These two factors prove that the death penalty is an incoherent miscarriage of justice.
And based on this research, it is inherently obvious that the inhumanity of the capital punishment is
…show more content…
settle death penalty cases with skyrocketing funds. Nick Gillespie discusses these principles in his video called: “Three Reasons to Get Rid of the Death Penalty”. He states that since 1980, California has spent over four billion dollars on death penalty cases; yet has only executed thirteen inmates. The U.S. also annually dishes out 134 million dollars per case concerning the death penalty. This is far more expensive than the cost that would be covered for incarcerating the criminals for life without parole (Gillespie). It is inherently obvious that the death penalty has been and will always be, for the remainder of its implementation, a shaky approach to resolving issues. It is very expensive and has many missing parts to why we even keep it around. These reasons hold true to the fact that the national abolishment of the death penalty is the optimal option in pushing towards a better

Related Documents