Arguments Against Capital Punishment Analysis

Great Essays
Confutatio: Used as a common position against capital punishment, the right of and outreach for common humanity is expressed by many who oppose this course of action. This view is primarily derived from biblical text stating “thou shalt not kill”. From this viewpoint, the argument that killing someone – even when they killed someone themselves – goes against this divinely appointed commandment. It is therefore not an appropriate remedy towards the issue. In a statement given in March 2011 by the Chapter of Amnesty International of Yale University, the position of human values being in danger is discussed. As the article states, “The death penalty is an attack on our foundational and universal human dignity—our common humanity” (1). The statement …show more content…
In an article published by The Lancet. It says,” One of the most alarming of the outcomes of the death sentence is the exoneration of the condemned, sometimes through DNA evidence”. It continues to say that in the last forty-four years, one hundred and twenty six individual who were on death row were found not guilty of the crime they supposedly committed, and were falsely accused for reasons from untrustworthy witnesses to mental instability. While it is alarming that individuals are falsely accused of these types of crimes, one may also find that this reasoning of increased knowledge and subsequent exoneration of convicted persons may also be a strong argument in favor of the death sentence. Due to advanced technology, we are able to clear individuals of a crime they were suspected of before the death penalty is carried out, making capital punishment a more reliable and effective means of punishing criminals and bringing about justice. One example is that of Corey Omar Posley-Wells, a twenty-seven year old man who was convicted of killing Irene Kunze, a ninety year old woman. Reporter Jim Adams says, “Police linked him to the crime scene using a relatively new type of DNA technology that matched his DNA to that found in skin or body-fluid traces in her apartment”. His article continues on to describe the relief of the other …show more content…
Many argue that the death penalty is not a good form of punishment because people are more likely to sentence a person to death who is a different race. Therefore, the sentencing is unjust and does not serve as a form of justice. A survey in 2000 by the Federal Death Penalty System shows that 80% of cases that were submitted were influenced by racial bias. At least half of these cases had African Americans as the defendants (DPIC). With statistics such as these it’s hard to believe that there isn’t a system set up in order to lessen the amount of racial bias. There is in fact the Racial Justice Act which allows statistics to judge whether the racial bias played a part in sentencing the death sentence. If there is evidence of racial bias the judge can block the prosecutor from pursuing the death sentence or even overturn the jury’s decision (Evans). Racism affecting the death penalty is still a worrying dilemma but that doesn’t that mean that the crime they committed doesn’t warrant the death penalty. It would be equally unjust to let a murderer go free just because they are a different race from the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While acquitting the accused, the same forensic evidence allows to find the real suspect. In addition, there have been many cases where the wrongfully convicted had been acquitted based on forensic science, and the same forensic science led them to determine the real suspect. One of the many cases is the case of Frank Lee Smith who was at first convicted of rape and murder but then " On December 15, 2000, eleven months after his death, and fourteen years after his 1986 conviction, Frank Lee Smith was exonerated based on exculpatory DNA testing results. These results not only cleared Smith of the crime, but identified the true…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These trials are nothing more than fraud trial which defy the spiritual ethics as well as the societal framework of life. Experience has shown that innocent people are often convicted of a crime including capital crimes and that some of them have been executed. “Hugo bedaub states that no matter careful courts are, the possibility of perjured testimony, mistaken honest, and human error remains all too real”. A recent study show over 400 cases of wrong conviction for capital offenses in the Unites Stated between 1900 and 1991. We can cite the case of Curtis McCarty served 21 years and 18 years on death row for a murder he did not commit, but when they reexamined the case and they found him innocent.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, many studies on death penalty do not support this claim, and the rate of murders during the time when death penalty was still legal reflect no sign of decrease. It is another reason why capital punishment should not be legally recognized. One of the points of death penalty is to make it a threat to criminals so that they wouldn’t be compelled to do crimes. But according to statistics, capital punishment is neither a factor in the increase nor decrease of crime and murder rates. Another factor that contributes to the reason why death penalty should not be legalized is because it encourages fear to be the pioneer of mainting order in the society; and that is not the case at…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which when applied to cases before it was available many times showed the person was innocent. In addition, this shows us that our methods can always be improved upon as technology advances and more importantly, that we could be executing innocent people that could be cleared by more advanced technology and analysis in evidence. Accordingly, as stated “Since 1989 there have been tens of thousands of cases where prime suspects were identified and pursued until DNA testing (prior to conviction) proved that they were innocent, or wrongly accused.” (http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/FactSheet.pdf…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore the severity of such a crime do needs one to face death penalty which will be termed as justice that has been served. DISADVANTAGES OF CAPITAL PURNISHMENT Most of the states have abolished capital punishment due to its advantages. 1. It is a sin to kill Based on the Christian perception and thinking is that killing is a sin and in most states and countries whereby capital punishment has been abolished are Christian based, and do not agree with taking one’s life no matter what he or she has done. These do mean that they do not belief in killing as it is cited in the bible.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white defendants who were executed killed 696 white victims and 20 black victims.”(Chow) Clearly minorities are receiving unequal justice before the law, leading to an obvious reason to not support the death penalty. In such an unfair system, taking lives away should not be an…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people do not think it is morally right for the government to be able to dole out a death sentence. Bruce Fein, quoted for being pro-death penalty hit the nail on the head in his statement; “…Abolitionists may contend that the death penalty is inherently immoral because governments should never take human life, no matter what the provocation. But that is an article of faith, not of fact. The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a free moral actor able to control his own destiny for good or for ill…”…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty Is Wrong

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    (Wenzel, Robert) Death sentences do not depend the race of the criminal but on the crime. Those who accuse the death penalty of showing discrimination should find where each criminal came from and what he or she did. Certain areas are home to the majority of a certain race (i.e. you may find more African Americans in southern regions than in northern regions). Also, the Death Penalty is not favored by just one group, either.…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty itself is just while its distribution is not always fair. He then claims that even those who show statistics to prove racist faults in the distribution of capital punishment fail to present an argument that would warrant abolishing the penalty, since justice is…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminals that are put in death row are there for a reason because for raping and murdering an 11 month baby. We have the right to punish those who deserve it but only to the degree they deserve it. Retributivists do not justify the death penalty by the general deterrence or safety it brings us. Of course the death penalty is mostly disproportionately against people of color or poor people, Black men were more than six times as likely as white men in 2010 to be incarcerated. Black men in 2010 was 44347 inmates per 100,000 and the rate of white men rate was 678 per 100,000 prisoners on death row.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics