Death Penalty: An Annotated Bibliography

Decent Essays
Justifiable Punishment - Support of the Death Penalty: An Annotated Bibliography
Guengerich, Galen. “The Death Penalty’s Underlying Problem.” Time.Com (2014): 1. Business Source Complete. Web. 12 Nov. 2012.
Guengerich is the senior minister of New York’s All Souls Unitarian Church, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and author of God Revised: How Religion Must Evolve in a Scientific Age. In this article, he takes a stance against the death penalty. His article does not make a clear argument supported by facts; instead, he supports his opinion by passing judgment on those who allow murder or remain ignorant of crime. Therefore, to refute his stance, I plan to redirect the focus to the guilty party, the murderer.
"The Village Green."
…show more content…
In this article, three authors explain their opinion starting with David Gushee, the director of the Center for Theology and Public life at Mercer University. He presents scriptural evidence to supporting Christians being both pro-life and pro-death penalty, determining that the death penalty against murderers does prevent murders. Second, Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, concedes capital punishment is ethical if carried out by civil magistrates against evildoers. Third, Glen Stassen, professor of Christian ethics at Fuller Theological Seminary and coauthor with David Gushee of Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context, opposes the death penalty, considering capital punishment revenge. Consequently, his argument is too narrowly focused, and I will suggest considering the death penalty justice instead of revenge in order to refute his …show more content…
Romans 13: 1-7 provides biblical support for a magistrate to use the death penalty to punish evil criminals. This scripture supports my argument that capital punishment is biblically ethical; as well as, Leviticus 24: 17 which condones a person being executed for murdering another person. Also, Numbers 35: 29-31 continues support for capital punishment by saying if anyone kills a person, he shall be put to death. On the contrary, Ezekiel 33: 14-19 is used by many against capital punishment as biblical evidence that we should forgive murderers. I plan to refute this argument because forgiveness is not a substitution for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The author’s point of this article was to give insight to the controversial view points on the death penalty, being in favor of those who deserve the capital punishment and opposed to those who do not deserve it, and argues that until the death penalty is not justified even without uncertainty to those that deserve it, and the moral deterrence is abolished from those that favor it, the argument against it will never…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In What Do Murderers Deserve? David Gelernter explores the idea of the death penalty, and its acceptable uses. He does this by providing complex ideas, analogies, and examples, allowing his numerous evidence to actually prove his point. His writing style is eloquent and slightly inflammatory, as he tries to inspire support to an issue that is often pushed to the periphery of other discussions.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Arguments against the death penalty can be simplified and classified into the categories of the brutality of the process, along with its morality, and the basic reason of why it is apart of the United States Judicial system. The argument in support of the death penalty has been prevalent throughout the decades and although the times have changed the reasons of why it is obligatory to the safety of this nation's citizens. When presented with the question concerning the necessity of the death penalty, an essay by Edward I. Koch titled "Death and Justice" comes to mind in support of capital punishment. Koch starts with two short examples of murderers who were on death row and executed in 1984.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution, we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." Desmond Tutu said this and I could not agree more. I think that capital punishment is morality wrong, and that Walter Berns’ “The Morality of Capital Punishment” article in Exploring Ethics fails on many grounds. Berns uses anger and a politically correct government to advocate the use of capital punishment. I am going to try and prove that Burns is wrong, and that by killing we are only fueling the fire and a continuous cycle.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should the U.S have the Death Penalty? Do you believe in the Death Penalty? In this essay you might be persuaded to the opposite side of your belief or stuck in the middle. I got my facts and details from Death penalty in the United States: why we still have it by Kevin Rizzo, December 20, 2014.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For those whom like to act as if they were God and take a life intentionally deserves to be punished. In fact, other than God whom can punish someone are the jails and prison that house these types of individuals. There are some cold blooded killers out in the world, along with some individuals whom are not mentally able to make conscious delinquent actions. In fact these types of people become inmates inside of correctional institutions that are housed in supermax sanctions have prompted arguments regarding people are for or against the death penalty, the bans on executions on the mentally retarded and juveniles are also addressed. Giving that this world is filled with a very mixed cultural background of all kinds of human beings.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sixth commandment of the Bible states that “thou shalt not kill.” : Certainly, this makes capital punishment wrong. Capital punishment was not made to promote killing but it stands as a god-ordained action for human government. According to the author of The Biblical Truth about America's Death Penalty, Dale Recinella, everyone is deserving of death. The criminal laws that were given to man by God were made to work with a community for both victims and offenders, leading us to ask if certain crimes are worthy of death.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment: An Annotated Bibliography When considering the possibility that capital punishment could be justified as a response towards evil action. Approvingly that capital punishment is an appropriate crime punishment in a response to murder, “the greatest crime known to the law.” As capital punishment is not morally permissible as a response to evil, then it cannot be permissible morally. If capital punishment cannot be justified towards a response in evils acts, when will it ever be justified.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    August 15, 2016 Bruce Rauner, Governor Office of the Governor James R. Thompson Center 100 W. Randolph, 16-100 Chicago, IL 60601 Dear Governor Rauner, This letter is to address my position on capital punishment that it’s never acceptable to kill or murder because the “Eye for Eye” (Messerli) or Tooth for Tooth is not an ethical theory. As Christian we no longer live by the law an Eye for an Eye, which was represented in the book of Exodus 21:22-25; we live by grace, which is stated in Matthews 5:38-42. To put the bible in layman terms from New International Version it mentions the following about Eye for Eye: Exodus: 21:22-25 (Law Living) 22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely[e] but there is…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is moral to uphold capital punishment as reverence for life itself. Indeed, a fact which suggests that, if anything, it may be the abolition of capital punishment which threatens to cheapen life. It is necessary to uphold justice and righteousness in the face of heinous evil, as life itself is sacred. ( Budziszewski, 2002) 2. Capital punishment is morally justified as the deterrent effect is significant, demonstrating that those who inflict grotesque crimes against others will be met with just retribution (typically the view of…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays