Criticism Of Societal Problems In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

One of the most American writers in the twentieth century, Arthur Miller is most admired by critics for expressing his criticism of societal problems in his plays The Death of a Salesman and The Crucible. First staged in 1953, The Crucible is a play based on the Salem witch trials of 1692. When Reverend Parris’s daughter falls into a deathly coma, the villagers quickly assume that the devil is present in Salem. The theocracy soon establishes a court to “melt down all concealment.” As the court increases the pressure, the judges test everyone’s mettle, especially that of John and Elizabeth Proctor. Along with being repeatedly questioned by the court for their relationship with the Devil, the couple must also deal with the internal demons in their marriage. The relationship of John and Elizabeth evolves from a sad distance, to continuous distrust, and finally to a selfless love for one another. In the beginning of Act II, John Proctor and his wife Elizabeth are going through a time of cold sorrow. After a long day in the fields, John comes home to his wife whistling in their children’s …show more content…
John has taken the place for Elizabeth on trial and she finally begins to realize his goodness. Elizabeth goes to John in the jailhouse to check on him and bring him news of the trials. John does not know whether he should confess or remain silent. Elizabeth reassures him with, “As you will, I would have it. I want you living, John. That is sure.” Throughout the entire play, John has tried to earn back the love and trust of his wife. He has taken the place of Elizabeth on trial and finally she is able to feel love for him once again. John had lost his way in his marriage and in his life, but in the end, Elizabeth is able to find the goodness in John and forgive him; which she expresses at the end of the play Elizabeth crying out, “He have his goodness now. God forbid I take it from