Similarities Between Socrates And Lucretius

Improved Essays
There is no possible way to escape death. Death is an inevitable fate for everyone. Thanatology is the study of death. It focuses on the social aspects of death as well as the mechanisms and forensic aspects, such as the bodily effects that are associated with death. Socrates is an ancient philosopher that I agree with regarding to his theory on thanatology, whereas Lucretius is a philosopher that I do not agree with. People’s different or similar aspects regarding death are the result of societal and cultural influences such as religion, art and funeral rituals. Ones ideas, views, beliefs, attitudes, and values regarding death are molded into them since youth. There are three ways to view death; either you’re death-accepting, death-defying, …show more content…
He believed that there is no need to involve any divine beings in the formation of our universe because according to Lucretius the nature of our universe can be explained by natural laws. He believed that there is no need to be afraid of deities because the reason for the way the world operates is because of natural phenomena, or atoms. Lucretius argued against the fear of death, stating that death is just the disintegration of one’s material being. He stated that the human’s physical body is a vessel that holds their mind and spirit but one’s mind and spirit cannot continue to live if not confined in the physical body. According to Lucretius if ones physical body deceases then their mind and spirit cease to exist as well. Since one cannot feel or think when they perish, they cannot miss being alive, therefore death is neither a good nor bad thing nor should it not be something we should worry about. Lucretius claimed that fear of death is something experienced while alive, and that only a living mind can feel. Lucretius claims there is no reason to fear death and conveys his symmetry argument against the fear of death. The symmetry argument states that death and our pre-natal state of non-being are the same because if our pre-natal state of non-being counts as nothing then our death should count as nothing as well. In De Rerum Natura Lucretius states that “the soul and body live and perish together; …show more content…
My beliefs on death are completely opposite of Lucretius, and although both philosophers believe we should not fear death, I completely disagree with Lucretius’ theory of nothingness. I believe in Socrates’ theory and that we do not know what exactly will happen when we die. Nobody has crossed over to the afterlife and then came back to tell us what awaits us but my belief about the afterlife is based on faith, because while you are alive all you can do is have faith that there is purgatory, heaven, and hell. It may also be possible that we cross over to an unconscious state where we sleep forever undisturbed but I believe that no matter what happens our soul will always live on, even if your physical body is deceased. Each of us will face judgment when our time comes and since heaven is our ultimate goal when it comes to death we should lead lives that are pure and just. Depending on what one believes, death is either the end of an existence, or it is the passageway into another realm or

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although multiple novels were published by Sophocles there was much more than plays happening in the city-state Athens. Socrates a great and powerful mind was reaching the peak of his philosophical career as Pericles began to lead the Golden Age which would last from 500-300 B.C. They gave us monuments ideas innovations and more during that time. However Sophocles and Socrates minds differed quite radically. Those two brilliant minds brought us greek trauma drama and subtle cognitive indifferent philosophies.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Socrates and Euthyphro meet, Socrates clarifies for Euthyphro the charges that the state has brought against him and Euthyphro is disturbed to hear about the trouble of his friend. He says that he too has been involved in a rather unpleasant set of charges, namely his own accusation against his father. Socrates is quite surprised to hear this because in ancient Greece it was considered very bold to officially accuse one's own family member of anything, and mortals who did such were not looked upon kindly by the Greek Gods. Euthyphro admits that he is prosecuting his father for the murder of a servant and consequently, he is considered by his fellow citizens and statesman to be acting "impiously".…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe that both Socrates and Lucretius have good arguments on how to be afraid of death. They have some similarities, but they have many contradictories within each of each other 's arguments. The thought in different ways are not from similar time periods. Although, both did agree on that death is a part of life and once you’re gone, you are gone and feel no…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike Socrates, I would have jumped at Crito’s offer to flee Athens and avoid the death penalty in a heartbeat. Both Crito and the Laws present rather strong arguments as to why Socrates should either stay or flee from jail. While the rational and selfish part of me wants to concede to Crito’s escape plan, I would argue that the Laws present a better case for staying than Crito does for leaving. Socrates is personifying the Laws of Athens and imagining how he would respond to their claims. The Laws say that it would be wrong for Socrates to violate the verdict because what would happen if more than one individual were to disobey the law?…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “What will happen to me when I die? We as Christians believe in eternal life after death. Is there life after death? I think it depends on our choice and our personal relationship with God. Our choice of receiving Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior or not while living on earth is believed to determine our eternal state in two literal places called Heaven and Hell.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Galileo and Socrates both offer various methods of arriving at conclusions within their philosophies and studies, each articulating specific information to their followers as they advocate through either science or philosophy. Within the Republic, Socrates offers his stance on justice and its placement within a city run by philosophers through reasoning. However, within the Sidereal Messenger, Galileo offers his account of information through the scientific method, a method that uses facts to support his cause. These two approaches vary immensely, each contrasting in their approach to the justification of their work and therefore cannot be used interchangeably. As Galileo’s scientific method allowed him to concoct factual evidence surrounding his findings, this approach would naturally not enable Socrates to prove his ideologies as it is merely theoretical pondering, not evidence based conclusions that can be proved in reality, therefore the methods used by Galileo would not be feasible to test…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucretius and Epicureanism believes in freedom and free will. If we are released from all fears, for example, the gods and death, and just analyze life we are being lead to a life of happiness. For many people, they a fearful of death, but "death is nothing to us and no concern of ours, since the nature of the mind is now held to be mortal" (Lucretius 45). This means that we should not fear death because we have no conscious when we are dead. This case is very similar to before we were born.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will be discussing and analyzing two paintings, one by Jacques-Louis David called “The Death of Socrates” and the other by Eugene Delacroix called “The Death of Sardanapalus”. The analysis will include a discussion of the artworks content such as the historical factors and the two different styles that each painting represents. The Neoclassical style is represented by “The Death of Socrates” and the Romantic style is represented by “The Death of Sardanapalus”. The form of the painting will be discussed through the elements of design and principle of design which will be included when analyzing the two paintings. The elements of design will include line, shape, value, color, space, and texture on the two paintings.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Emma Hall Mr. de Guzman American Studies– Period 6 17 November 2017 Dickinson Doesn’t Fear the Reaper What is death? The number of times this question has been Google searched worldwide has reached its highest point since 2004 in recent months (“Interest”). While this seems grim, it is a question about which many people wonder throughout their lives. It may be that it is impossible to know the answer to this question for sure, but there are people who develop their own ideas and share them.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates and Callicles engage in a debate about what it means to be happy and to live a flourishing life. According to Callicles, a person is happy and flourishing when he or she is living as ambitiously as he or she possibly can. Living the good life includes chasing one satisfaction after another and having a constant influx of pleasure. In contrast, Socrates emphasizes on the idea of eudaimonia, according to which a happy and flourishing person is one that lives an orderly life, in which the person maintains discipline and control over oneself.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates’s Argument on Death The topic of death frightens human beings for several reasons because of the speculation and the anxiety that surround death. Even though most people fear death, philosophers such as Socrates argue that there is no valid reason to fear death (Ahrensdorf 1995). According to 5Socrates, death is a blessing in the context of the relocation of the soul. Socrates avers that death is something that people should not fear and provide several arguments to validate his argument.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though Zhuangzi’s true thoughts on death (as on many things) are occasionally unclear and apparently contradictory (in some instances, he seems to regard death as something bad that should be avoided and a long, natural life as a positive, as is implied by the stories of Hundun and Crippled Shu [95, 61], while in most others he expresses the more accepting view of death I explore here), one view dominates throughout his work. That view is this: death is an unavoidable part of life, and we therefore should not take great pains to avoid it or worry about the fact that we will die someday (though, if that worry does happen to naturally arise, we should not actively suppress it). In the same way that where there is day there must be night, “where…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the history of literature, there have been many different examples of the characteristics present in a heros. Such works of literature come from great ancient societies such as the Greeks and the Romans. “Ancient Greek society placed considerable emphasis on literature and, according to many, the whole Western literary tradition began there, with the epic poems of Homer. ”(Mastin) Examples of these include Homer’s, The Iliad and The Odyssey, as well as Virgil’s The Aeneid.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays