Death And Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life By Edward Ed Koch

Good Essays
I am against death penalty, and mayor Edward I. Koch is completely wrong about death penalty. Death penalty is ethically wrong, diminishes human life, and can be deadly for innocent people. “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” (Mohandas K. Gandhi). The irony of death penalty is that a killer is being killed. The quote by Gandhi shows that one killing with lead to another and in the end whole world is suffering. Edward I Koch is a death penalty supporter, the politician wants death penalty to be the capital punishment.
The argument “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” by Edward I Koch describes Koch’s point of view on death penalty and attempts to persuade why death penalty is justified. Koch identifies seven
…show more content…
Crimes are ubiquitous, thus the people who commit the crimes are also found everywhere. In this high number of crimes, wrong or innocent people can be captured and arrested. Mr. Bedau argues that “death penalty should be abolished because of the abstract possibility that an innocent person might be executed” (Koch 128). I agree that there is always a slight possibility that an innocent person could be killed in death penalty. There are always cases where people are being released from the prison for a crime they did not commit. Modern technology aides to prove that innocence of the people. Koch argues that records fail to show that innocent person has died; however, if the “murders” were put on death penalty, the cases of innocent people would have never opened and the innocent people would be dead for no reason …show more content…
Koch claims that reducing a sentence for a crime, such as rape, lowers the value of victim’s life. I agree that reducing a sentence does not serve as true justice to the victim; however, increasing does not mean that the victim’s life is regarded highly. I agree with columnist Kimmy Breslin, “a life sentence is actually a harsher penalty for murder than death” (Koch 129). Koch called Breslin’s statement nonsensical and said that victim choose to live rather than die. No doubt that living is better than death; however living in a confinement for an extended period of time (several decades) is tiring and a punishment in itself. The death sentence does not make the criminal any better or make the criminal feel guilty about his/her wrong-doings. The criminal gets put to sleep and no type of punishment is served; the victim does not get the genuine justice.
Why should the government kill people who themselves kill other people to show that killing is wrong. Death Penalty is unethical and it should be condemned, most religions, if not all, have some relationship to why a killing is wrong. The death penalty is also extremely costly, it costs millions of dollars per execution; most of the times the cost the paid by the taxpayers. On top of the cost, the barbaric punishment is useless if there is no chance given for improvement and being irrational. Life is priceless and cannot

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    It is what separates our mentality from the criminal’s mentality. We have a mind and a conscience that helps us decide what is morally right or wrong. In the article “Death Penalty,” it states how a man sentenced to death testified that he felt his whole body being burnt (Kiener). Problems like these make the death penalty inhumane, giving a strong reason for it not to be legal in America. Why do we need to practice it?…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pro Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The worse crime should get the highest punishment because if he killer didn’t get punished then our gov’t wouldn’t be serving its country of protecting its people. The worse the crime then no question about it that the assailant should get the worst possible consequence (Gold 2012). Capital punishment is the result for a human life being sacrificed. If a murderer didn’t receive the death penalty then it would fail the importance of our laws and social morality (Gold 2012). In our society today, citizens see murder as something disgusting and as an act that goes against everyone’s morality.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The death penalty is destroying the sanctity of the United States Justice system as we know it. The most common form of carrying out the death penalty is ineffective, the whole process of the death penalty is expensive and lengthy, and people simply don’t want it anymore. It is a barbaric way of treating criminals and is more of a burden than a benefit. There are other ways to treat terrible criminals that would keep them isolated and with no chance of escaping. The death penalty, as in any case, is determined by the judge and jury.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is a wrong done to the victim, the defendant, the families, and the country; the United States must replace the death penalty as capital punishment with life without parole and hard labor. The death penalty does not change or reduce anything, it takes the life of innocent people, abuses the nation, and cost tax payers millions of dollars. The government must understand that there is no difference between illegal and legalized murder is murder, and this punishment should no longer be allowed. After several years of these inmates being on death row, the state decides the day he or she will take their last breath; but however said that dying was a bad thing? This is only another way for the system to have…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that killing is always wrong no matter what. If a guy murders another guy and people murder him it’s just one more life gone. I thought that if one human being killed another, they deserved the death penalty. But, you know what that is too good for someone like that. They deserve to rot in prison.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Innocents are at risk of losing their lives for something they never did, and there has been many cases in the past where innocents have unfortunately died. Killing someone because they had killed someone is an unforgiving sentiment, and only serves to preserve the violent nature of society which may potentially lead to more people dying. The argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent for crime is a false argument; not only does it do absolutely nothing to slow down the crime rate, it can lead to increase in the crime rate. Economic issues are found with the usage of the death penalty, that states spend an abnormal amount of money on cases with the death penalty and gaining nothing from it. The money should be more wisely invested, such as areas that are in critical need of funding.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If we enforced the death penalty there wouldn’t be as many prisoners in prison; they would be executed. Here many people who despise the death penalty would probably object that capital punishment is not the moral solution to such a problem. Regardless, we need a solution and we need it fast. The death penalty can help the prisons from becoming too full. Just letting prisoners out isn’t helping the cause because most prisoners go back to prison with in three years or so anyways.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Black men in 2010 was 44347 inmates per 100,000 and the rate of white men rate was 678 per 100,000 prisoners on death row. Finally, the death penalty is used for revenge. Death penalty is all unacceptable practice that sows vengeance and does not bring justice to victims of crimes. No matter how serious the crime, to kill a convicted person is an offense to the inviolability of life and to the dignity of the human person, The death penalty can be used but only if this the only possible way for punishment. It also stresses the importance of not removing the possibility of redemption from a person convicted.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Death Penalty The death penalty how much does society really knows or understand about the process? Many people view the death penalty a justice “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth ( mathew5:38).” The victim’s family might feel that the criminal is to be punished to the highest degree for his crime. Most people feel that is justice. However, most people do not really know much about the process of executing a death row inmate, how much more the death penalty cost comparing with keeping an inmate in prison for life without parole. The death penalty is unethical and waste of millions of dollars, because the death penalty is a very slow process, and waste of taxpayers’ money.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is where burns theory falls apart, because I don’t think burns himself could even answer this question without making, some sort of loophole in his theory. If we kill anyone of these people we are saying that the justice system can be wrong, and if that is true then burns idea, that the justice system is always right is flawed, and that the justice system is killing innocent…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays