Death And Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life By Edward Ed Koch

Improved Essays
I am against death penalty, and mayor Edward I. Koch is completely wrong about death penalty. Death penalty is ethically wrong, diminishes human life, and can be deadly for innocent people. “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” (Mohandas K. Gandhi). The irony of death penalty is that a killer is being killed. The quote by Gandhi shows that one killing with lead to another and in the end whole world is suffering. Edward I Koch is a death penalty supporter, the politician wants death penalty to be the capital punishment.
The argument “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” by Edward I Koch describes Koch’s point of view on death penalty and attempts to persuade why death penalty is justified. Koch identifies seven
…show more content…
Crimes are ubiquitous, thus the people who commit the crimes are also found everywhere. In this high number of crimes, wrong or innocent people can be captured and arrested. Mr. Bedau argues that “death penalty should be abolished because of the abstract possibility that an innocent person might be executed” (Koch 128). I agree that there is always a slight possibility that an innocent person could be killed in death penalty. There are always cases where people are being released from the prison for a crime they did not commit. Modern technology aides to prove that innocence of the people. Koch argues that records fail to show that innocent person has died; however, if the “murders” were put on death penalty, the cases of innocent people would have never opened and the innocent people would be dead for no reason …show more content…
Koch claims that reducing a sentence for a crime, such as rape, lowers the value of victim’s life. I agree that reducing a sentence does not serve as true justice to the victim; however, increasing does not mean that the victim’s life is regarded highly. I agree with columnist Kimmy Breslin, “a life sentence is actually a harsher penalty for murder than death” (Koch 129). Koch called Breslin’s statement nonsensical and said that victim choose to live rather than die. No doubt that living is better than death; however living in a confinement for an extended period of time (several decades) is tiring and a punishment in itself. The death sentence does not make the criminal any better or make the criminal feel guilty about his/her wrong-doings. The criminal gets put to sleep and no type of punishment is served; the victim does not get the genuine justice.
Why should the government kill people who themselves kill other people to show that killing is wrong. Death Penalty is unethical and it should be condemned, most religions, if not all, have some relationship to why a killing is wrong. The death penalty is also extremely costly, it costs millions of dollars per execution; most of the times the cost the paid by the taxpayers. On top of the cost, the barbaric punishment is useless if there is no chance given for improvement and being irrational. Life is priceless and cannot

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This article, written for Time Magazine, gave people a better idea of what was going on with the death penalty and understand why the era of capital punishment is coming to an end. The organization of “The Death of the Death Penalty” was confusing and sometimes I didn’t quite understand what was being talked about. The essay’s argument, however, is constructed logically by giving the reader facts and statistics. Von Drehle argues that the capital punishment system has failed and causes our government to spend millions of dollars on…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Death and Justice”: The Art of Persuasion Regarding Capital Punishment For as long as anyone can remember, the death penalty has often been a topic of controversy that can be sensitive to talk about. The article, “Death and Justice” by Edward I. Koch, published in the New Republic in April of 1985, discusses the aforementioned matter with regards to why he believed it was necessary in the time and age for crimes such as murder to face dire consequences. Koch was a renowned leader and the mayor of New York City for 11 years, and strongly believed in capital punishment. The main audience that he had hoped to address with the article were those who at the time may have been skeptical, unaware of why the death penalty was needed, or even opposed…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Edward Koch, who was Mayor of New York between the years of 1978 to 1989, and has been involved in Democratic politics for many years, is a proponent of the death penalty. His argument is that the only way to give justice to a victim is to put the murderer to death. Koch lists the…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    To kill or not to kill. The legalization of the death penalty in certain states of America indubitably causes an issue cluttered with controversy, yet one worth analyzing. Although I am relatively informed on the topic because of my strong interest in real crime shows and documentaries, I would not say I am biased, for I do not possess a strong conviction on either side. On the contrary, David Bruck, a successful lawyer devoted to the defense of persons charged with a capital crime, offers a worthwhile insight into the discussion. His essay "The Death Penalty" responds to an essay by the Democratic mayor of New York City at the time, Edward I. Koch.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines the death penalty as “execution imposed in court of law as punishment for a crime.” Edward I. Koch, a New York mayor from 1978-1989, supports the death penalty while David Bruck, Harvard College alumni, opposes the death penalty. In the essay “The Death Penalty: Is It Ever Justified?” and “The Death Penalty” both Koch and Bruck talk about the death penalty, yet they both argue the value of life very differently by elaborating their points of view.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Death Penalty Texas

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not all the cases with death sentences is right, “I don't want to put one innocent person to death to put 99 that are guilty to death,” said Gary Johnson (Johnson 1). In addition, the cost of it is also excessively expensive; therefore, this solution is not as good as its definition. The death penalty has its impacts to the criminal behavior of people as the result of reducing crime rates since it was re-instituted. One can say keep it but only for a symbol. Life is precious, and no one has the right to end other’s…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When someone commits a crime there are many punishments they can receive. House arrest, fines, jail time are some of the most common. But one type of punishment is the most polarizing of them all, the death penalty. Whether the death penalty should be used is often a debated topic between the science of killing someone for their crimes, or the more religious beliefs that it is cruel and unusual to use the death penalty. When considering people who were sentenced to the death penalty like Gregg, Penry, and Baze.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I have presented both an argument in favor of the death penalty and against the death penalty. To start with there is a brief history of capital punishment including some important legal cases. Many arguments can be made as to the morality of execution, below I describe the deterrent effects as well as a common view held by Immanuel Kant in support of capital punishment. Both of these views are shared by many people. In opposition to capital punishment I have considered the fundamental view that killing, even a murderer, is wrong and the morality of charging juries with understanding the laws that govern sentencing.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He becomes a big supporter of the death penalty which is dominant in his paper where he list different objections to the death penalty than counteracts them. Koch starts off by saying that the death penalty is simply barbaric. The action itself is not barbaric due to its purpose of killing without suffering. A down side of killing people is you cannot take the death penalty back. Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Problem with the death penalty being an option of punishment is in fact, that most people sent to death sit there for years on end. Moreover, the argument of financial is coming into question. The action of actually executing an inmate is costly. Finally, there is the debate on the innocent being killed but also the thoughts that other countries have on our methods of punishment.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have a right to punish those who have done heinous acts; the punishment should fit the crime. We should execute those who deserve it most and release those who don’t deserve to die and (Blecker 1). The absence of the death penalty is the rises crime rate. An estimated 2,000,000 in the US were victims to crimes from assault to murder, according to Time magazine. With poor laws to help this problem or the lack of serious punishment, criminals become careless and are bolder to commit offenses because of the mercy in punishments and the loop holes in the laws of the justice system.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays