Death And Justice Edward Koch Analysis

Decent Essays
On April 15, 1985 an essay written by Edward I. Koch was published in a magazine called the New Republic. Mr. Koch title his essay “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life”. In the essay the author explains why he continues to support the death penalty even after hearing and analyzing the opinions and adverse points of views against capital punishment. Mr. Koch begins by stating that even if others believe that the death penalty is cruel, it is actually done more humane and without any pain and suffering. At the same time, the essay describes the death penalty as a fair punishment for murders committed. Secondly, the author details that there might not be any other independent country that practice the death penalty. Although

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "Capital punishment’s slow death," George F. Will claims capital punishment is unjust. The death penalty is becoming used less over time, but Americans are still divided over whether it should be abolished or not. The movement created about capital punishment has split into liberals being against it and conservatives for it. This article is able to give insight into both sides, as George Will is a conservative who is against the death penalty.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two distinguished social and political philosophers take opposing positions in this highly engaging work. Louis P. Pojman justifies the practice of execution by appealing to the principle of retribution, we deserve to be rewarded and punished according to the virtue or viciousness of our actions. He asserts that the death penalty does deter some potential murderers and that we risk the lives of innocent people who might otherwise live if we refuse to execute those deserving that punishment. Jeffrey Reiman argues that although the death penalty is a just punishment for murder, we are not morally obliged to execute murderers. Since we lack conclusive evidence that executing murderers is an effective deterrent and because we can foster the advance…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his essay, “The Death Penalty: Is it Ever Justified”, the longtime democratic and former mayor of New York Edward Koch refutes the idea that death penalty should be removed due to the possibility of an innocent suspect. To counter, Koch explains that states, “Human life deserves special protection, and one of the best ways to guarantee protection is to assure that convicted murderers do not kill again”. He goes on by adding that administering the death penalty is the only guaranteed solution. While killing these people does assure they will not commit murder again, the idea that an innocent citizen could be wrongly accused and receive the death penalty is an abhorrent thought. Once a citizen is executed, if more information is discovered…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Edward I. Koch provides multiple pinpoints on the view of the death penalty. Koch states clear evidence that supports each point he brings up. I use to be supportive of the death penalty until reading this passage. The reading is an eye-opener, showing that taking another life to vindicate murder is not justifiable. He brings up one of the Ten Commandments from the bible, “Thou Shalt Not Commit Murder,” which is one of America’s greatest source of inspiration.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The morality of the death penalty has long been, and still is a controversial topic in the United States. People have been debating for centuries whether or not this form of punishment should exist. Those supporting it have claimed that the death penalty acts as a deterrent of future crimes. On the other hand, those against it have disproved this claim. Studies show that capital punishment should not be used in the United States, since it does not act as a deterrent, certain groups are more likely to be sentenced to death, and it does not offer closure for families.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal punishment is an immensely ongoing controversial and societal issue in the United States, Europe and other parts of the world. There are thirty-one states that have kept the death penalty as a legal punishment and nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty, including New Jersey in 2007. Statistics show that 39 percent choose life without parole plus restitution, 33 percent would choose Capital Punishment, 13 percent chose life without parole, 9 percent picked life with parole, and 6 percent had no opinion. One of the main reasons people are pro death penalty is because it gives closure to the victim’s family. Defenders think that “taking an offender 's life is a more severe punishment than any prison life term.”…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On April 15th, 1985 “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” was published in the New Republic. In this article, the author Edward Koch, an outspoken lawyer and former mayor of New York City, uses seven main arguments of why he believes capital punishment is not only necessary but also a way to show how precious human life is (483). In this essay, I will not argue whether or not I agree with his view on the death penalty, but rather if Koch makes a sound and logical argument in favor of capital punishment. Although Koch is a well-educated man with a lot of experience with the issue at hand, his arguments seem to lack empirical evidence as well as plaguing them with fallacies. Koch starts out by painting a picture in your mind,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around for many years. It has been a controversial argument in the American society. According to the Webster Dictionary death penalty means the decision by a court of law that the punishment for someone’s crime will be death (Webster Dictionary). Over the years people have wondered many times what is the death penalty is, how this punishment works, and who qualify to receive such punishment. Many people are unaware of this social problem; it could be for many reasons.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the death penalty really worth it? After all is said and done, was it really the right thing to do? There is much controversy upon this topic and H.L. Mencken, a professional writer and scholar, has written a positive view on capital punishment in “The Penalty of Death”. Mencken’s arguments against executor uncomfortableness and the death penalty’s deterrence to others are effective, while his argument against the period of time left on death row is not.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every person is born with the essential right to live therefore, no one has the right to take their life away from them. Our society believes that if someone has taken the life of another human being, that they should have their life taken away from them as well. If society continues this cycle, the ever growing rate of murder will never end. The death penalty should not exist in America today. In Hugo Adam Bedau’s essay “An Abolitionist's Survey of the Death Penalty in America Today” he focuses on attacking the death penalty.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “A Death in Texas” written by Steve Earl, in 2001, Earl tells of his life changing experience and encounter with Jonathan Nobles. Nobles was found guilty of breaking into a house in Austin, Texas and stabbing two young women to death. Through the story Earl tells of his newfound friend and how the consequences of Nobles action affected and shaped Earl’s opinion. However tragic the experience was for those close to Nobles, capital punishment should be regularly practiced in all 50 states; it reduces overcrowding, puts fear into the convicted murderers, and lastly, not everyone has the ability to change as Jonathan Nobles did. As previously stated; if we would, as a nation, constantly sentence the death penalty, then the first…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic which receives a great deal of criticism from parties on both sides of the argument. Some suggest that it is morally sound on the basis of an eye-for-an-eye ideology, while others argue that its inherent hypocrisy makes the act illegitimate. By examining and analyzing Igor Primoratz’s A Life for a Life and its argument in support of the death penalty, I will attempt to both explain and discredit his argument on the grounds that murder ought not justify murder. Igor Primoratz’s central argument is that there is no equivalent punishment to murder, which is why in cases of murder, the death penalty is justified. Simply imprisoning someone who committed such a heinous crime as murder does not equate…

    • 1621 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Death and Justice”: The Art of Persuasion Regarding Capital Punishment For as long as anyone can remember, the death penalty has often been a topic of controversy that can be sensitive to talk about. The article, “Death and Justice” by Edward I. Koch, published in the New Republic in April of 1985, discusses the aforementioned matter with regards to why he believed it was necessary in the time and age for crimes such as murder to face dire consequences. Koch was a renowned leader and the mayor of New York City for 11 years, and strongly believed in capital punishment. The main audience that he had hoped to address with the article were those who at the time may have been skeptical, unaware of why the death penalty was needed, or even opposed…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays