Anti Federalists Essay

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd. Other people felt as if the new Constitution had no separation of powers. They felt as if the branches had too much power and there was nothing keeping one branch from becoming too powerful (Doc 2). The Anti-Federalists did not want to be in the same kind of government they fought so hard to get away from.
The Anti-Federalists were also frustrated with the fact that the new Constitution laid out all the rules, but did not list any rights the people had. So Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified. The Bill Of Rights lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution (Doc 6). This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would be approved and put into

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    during this time there was a great divide between the Federalists and the Anti-federalists the Anti-federalists opposed the the constitution, they believed the president and government have too much power. The federalists supported a strong central government and believed the state should not have more power than central government. The farmers wanted to a stronger federal government because they were already broke and under the Articles of Confederation the economic problems were only getting worse. So by creating the constitution this allowed most farmers to live without struggle, the constitution didn’t really hurt anyone because it helped economically, gave us a better judiciary system and also made voting…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They feared that that original text from the Constitution didn’t contain a bill of rights. The Federalist thought the Constitution didn’t need a bill of rights and they thought that the nation would possibly not survive without the passage from the Constitution. They also said that a stronger national government was required since the Articles of Confederation failed for not having a strong enough national…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anti-federalist thought that this new document would have all the same characteristics of Great Britain the country they had fought so hard to extract themselves from and others feared that this new government threatened their personal liberties. The Anti-Federalist demanded a document that protected states rights and individual rights and eventually the Federalist made The Bill Of Rights. I am standing here today signing the ratification of the constitution because of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists making this…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Anti-Federalists are against it and want a stronger state government. They have many fears about Constitution especially since it didn 't have Bill of Rights when it was ratified. One of people against ratifying the Constitution is Patrick Henry who gave speech for it. Henry sees himself as a guardian over rights and liberty. He didn’t get to go to the convention where the Constitution was being made and he saw this as America being in great danger.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalist were against the Bill of Rights and believed it would limit the rights and it was dangerous to make narrow rights that would limit powers that were not explicitly granted. Hamilton, a federalist, said that it was dangerous to limit rights by writing them down and created a form of enumerated rights. Meanwhile, the federalist believed that the Bill of Rights were necessary because they were a guarantee to right them down. Also it was method to limit against the federal government because the constitution was meant to give the government power but the Bill of Rights is limiting that. By enumerating the rights and power it leaves all the rest of the rights to the…

    • 2576 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A group of people called anti-federalist wanted to add a bill of right to protect individual rights from a strong and powerful government. After the constitution was created, the government added ten amendments referred to as the bill of right. The first amendment states the citizen have the right to any religion and they have the freedom to express it. Also in the Amendment it states that the government can not…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the fight for independence over, members of the newly formed United States sat down to write a set of laws for the nation. However, they were met with growing apprehension from Anti-Federalists, who favored strong state governments as opposed to a powerful central government. This group of commoners was afraid that this new form of government would resort to the monarchist principles of the former British regime, so they called for a protection of individual rights. On the other hand, Federalists were in support of a fortified central government. Both political parties had to reach a compromise in order to get the Constitution ratified, so James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights, or the first ten amendments of the Constitution.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The federalist of the Constitution were the people who supported it. The anti-federalist were those who went against it. Federalist thought that the Constitution was based on federalism. The anti-federalist believed that the Constitution took too much power away from the states and did not insured rights for the people. The federalists even wrote essays to answer the anti-federalist attacks to the Constitution.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bill of Rights was originally included in the Constitution as a compromise between the Antifederalists and the Federalists. Antifederalists believed that the Constitution would strengthen the national government, restricting their personal liberties that they fought so hard to retain in the Revolutionary War. On the other hand Federalists believed that the Constitution was necessary to strengthen the young nation. The Antifederalists would not ratify the Constitution so the Federalists agreed to compromise and create a Bill of Rights which would protect individual rights, personal liberties, and state rights. One of the biggest supporters of this compromise was James Madison who was a representative from Virginia.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-federalists pushed for the Bill of right to be included in the U.S. Constitution to attempt preventing an overbearing central government. The Constitution created by the Federalists was claimed to be written by aristocrats withholding rights to personal liberties of the people. Anti-Federalists feared that this might lead to an aristocratic tyranny where power would be held only by those with time, power, and wealth (Shelley, Schmidt, & Bardes, 2015). While Anti-Federalists were against such strong powers of the central government, they agreed that certain aspects of states’ governments should be equally upheld through federal legislation.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Origins and Incorporation of the Bill of Rights When the U.S. Constitution was first drafted it only addressed how the government would function and lacked any mention of individual rights and liberties at the federal or state level. This lack of individual rights and civil liberties provided difficulty in the ratification of the Constitution by the states. It took years of debate between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist to create the Bill of Rights (The Bill of Rights: A Brief History), The Federalists thought the Bill of Rights was unnecessary and the Anti-Federalists would not support the Constitution without it. The American People wanted guarantees that the new government would not trample on their newly won freedoms (The Bill of…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anti-Federalists fought for a Bill of Rights to be included within the Constitutional framework governing the federal government so as to explicitly codify individual rights under the law. Their skepticism regarding the nature of government recognized state action and the liberties of the individual citizen are typically antithetical in nature and in need of explicit protection. Some Federalists on the other hand were actually fearful of such methods, worrying that explicitly listing the rights of the individual was an inherently limiting approach to liberty – with the idea that those which were not listed were not fundamentally retained by the people. James Madison stated, “[T]he government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. It is not like the state governments, whose powers are more general.”…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays