Monuments shouldn’t be established or no longer established because of a sculpture capturing only a specific time and place of how it happened and also can take too much space; it also causes controversy between citizens in public places; such as malls, parks etc.
Individual communities perceive that it could be an agreeable way to preserve history from different types of bourgeois who made a change in antiquity and the world. But constructing large monuments will not get you anywhere. You might think it could recall some of the history of people, but it can only take you so far. Your mind won’t go far away when the person was born or each of their birthdays. Rather a printed name of the person can take you back to further information that altered history. “The …show more content…
Citizens that you get along with will be pleased by having a sculpture of yourself to remember all those beautiful memories.Also think of those people that hate you and don’t want a sculpture of you. It would cause a lot of controversy of politics (if you were from that stage). That’s exactly what’s happening in this century. A student from a class received the design program, which stated the basic philosophy of the memorial’s design and also its requirements: all the names of those missing and killed must’ve been a part of the memorial( Source G). Some people would be pleased of having a pillar that maintain remembrance of different people from the past. They would always inspect it and view of the mortal that made history or even changed the way the world is today.Example: The monumental core in Washington functions somewhat like a pilgrimage site, where communities of believers actually come together in the act of occupying a holy site, seeing a relic, reenacting a sacred event(Source A). But in fact it actually takes a lot of capacity and disturbs the peace of other people who don’t agree with the bygone
Individual communities perceive that it could be an agreeable way to preserve history from different types of bourgeois who made a change in antiquity and the world. But constructing large monuments will not get you anywhere. You might think it could recall some of the history of people, but it can only take you so far. Your mind won’t go far away when the person was born or each of their birthdays. Rather a printed name of the person can take you back to further information that altered history. “The …show more content…
Citizens that you get along with will be pleased by having a sculpture of yourself to remember all those beautiful memories.Also think of those people that hate you and don’t want a sculpture of you. It would cause a lot of controversy of politics (if you were from that stage). That’s exactly what’s happening in this century. A student from a class received the design program, which stated the basic philosophy of the memorial’s design and also its requirements: all the names of those missing and killed must’ve been a part of the memorial( Source G). Some people would be pleased of having a pillar that maintain remembrance of different people from the past. They would always inspect it and view of the mortal that made history or even changed the way the world is today.Example: The monumental core in Washington functions somewhat like a pilgrimage site, where communities of believers actually come together in the act of occupying a holy site, seeing a relic, reenacting a sacred event(Source A). But in fact it actually takes a lot of capacity and disturbs the peace of other people who don’t agree with the bygone