Are you willing to send out your young son of 18 to the front of a bloody war, when it might be the last time you see them? He didn’t want to go, but he had no choice and he was terrified of this experience. Many men and women take pride in their country, some are willing to sacrifice it all for the guarantee in protection, but many are afraid of what war is capable of doing people. By definition mandatory national service is a strategy used to build up a strong army filled with young men and women who are willing to risks their lives for the country. During any time of war, the United States will take people away from their lives in order to protect our nation's sovereignty. War is not something that should be taken lightly, and people who
…show more content…
4). It is amoral because it will put people’s mental health in danger and goes against some of the principles that our country are based on. This in particular seems very unfair for those people are not cut out for it, meaning they struggle even more with the war then with people who actually are willing to fight in. Is it worth the trouble to sacrifice the younger generation, the best alternative is to get people prepared for the war, build up their resistance to the struggles in war. According to Rangel Press Release which explains a legislation that was reintroduced which requires all women to register for the Selective Service, Rangel states that, “If we must go to war, every American should be compelled to stop and think twice about whether it is worth sending our brothers and sisters, and sons and daughters to fight. Currently less than one percent of America's population is unfairly shouldering the burden of war” (Doc. 6). It is going to be required, before they are drafted that these people, to perform up to two years of service in either a war …show more content…
Where is the free will in all of this? By doing mandatory drafting it will always greatly affect the next generation as well. We don’t want the United States to be all-military based where every single man and woman have to fight and have to risk their lives. It seems so unfair for many people could be at a disadvantage mentally or physically. These are some of the reasons why there should be mandatory service. It is financially unstable, cannot be justified as a moral situations to put civilian in, and it could possibly make the army worse because of some of the untrained and unskilled soldier’s. It should be about the quality of soldier’s not the quantity. That is why I am again this idea of mandatory national service and I hope that this puts these ideas into perspective. In conclusion, more experienced fighters should be fighting not kids who have just gotten into or out of college who have no experience, even if there is a national emergency, there are plenty of willing soldier’s to fighter. If they are willing and consent then they can participate in the national service. I see no reason to draft innocent people who aren’t ready to experience the brutal truth that is
4). It is amoral because it will put people’s mental health in danger and goes against some of the principles that our country are based on. This in particular seems very unfair for those people are not cut out for it, meaning they struggle even more with the war then with people who actually are willing to fight in. Is it worth the trouble to sacrifice the younger generation, the best alternative is to get people prepared for the war, build up their resistance to the struggles in war. According to Rangel Press Release which explains a legislation that was reintroduced which requires all women to register for the Selective Service, Rangel states that, “If we must go to war, every American should be compelled to stop and think twice about whether it is worth sending our brothers and sisters, and sons and daughters to fight. Currently less than one percent of America's population is unfairly shouldering the burden of war” (Doc. 6). It is going to be required, before they are drafted that these people, to perform up to two years of service in either a war …show more content…
Where is the free will in all of this? By doing mandatory drafting it will always greatly affect the next generation as well. We don’t want the United States to be all-military based where every single man and woman have to fight and have to risk their lives. It seems so unfair for many people could be at a disadvantage mentally or physically. These are some of the reasons why there should be mandatory service. It is financially unstable, cannot be justified as a moral situations to put civilian in, and it could possibly make the army worse because of some of the untrained and unskilled soldier’s. It should be about the quality of soldier’s not the quantity. That is why I am again this idea of mandatory national service and I hope that this puts these ideas into perspective. In conclusion, more experienced fighters should be fighting not kids who have just gotten into or out of college who have no experience, even if there is a national emergency, there are plenty of willing soldier’s to fighter. If they are willing and consent then they can participate in the national service. I see no reason to draft innocent people who aren’t ready to experience the brutal truth that is