Although many believe that human rights will continue, there are a select few that hope and believe that violations will cease to exist by the year 2100. These people can be found all over the world, in even the most dangerous places. Without light, there can never be darkness; without despair, there can never be hope—as long as human rights violations exist, there will always be groups and individuals who believe that the best will come. Support for the belief that human rights violations will end by 2100 can be shown vaguely in document A. Though this document is only a list of humans rights (UDHR) it can still be classified as falling under support for side B. The UDHR states, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”,
…show more content…
Because this declaration was written by many people of different religions and races, it can’t be marked as biased as it includes the views of many different individuals. This document is valid because it is written by professionals employed in the UN, including Eleanor Roosevelt and because it is a declaration, explaining the rights all humans have, no matter one’s personal lives, written in response to one of the world’s worst wars violations of human rights: WWII. Another document that supports views from side B is document G. This document is an overview of the promises and actions that Amnesty International can expect to take in order to protect people's’ human rights. Amnesty is an NGO, or a non-governmental organization which works off of donations and support from its seven million pledged members. Though this document, like document A is basically a “list” of expectations for Amnesty, the document could still be biased based on the promises made, and the ones actually kept. For example, the group who wrote the overview could have had opinions that differed from the opinions of the individuals that decide which cases to intervene in, and which ones to keep hidden from their
Because this declaration was written by many people of different religions and races, it can’t be marked as biased as it includes the views of many different individuals. This document is valid because it is written by professionals employed in the UN, including Eleanor Roosevelt and because it is a declaration, explaining the rights all humans have, no matter one’s personal lives, written in response to one of the world’s worst wars violations of human rights: WWII. Another document that supports views from side B is document G. This document is an overview of the promises and actions that Amnesty International can expect to take in order to protect people's’ human rights. Amnesty is an NGO, or a non-governmental organization which works off of donations and support from its seven million pledged members. Though this document, like document A is basically a “list” of expectations for Amnesty, the document could still be biased based on the promises made, and the ones actually kept. For example, the group who wrote the overview could have had opinions that differed from the opinions of the individuals that decide which cases to intervene in, and which ones to keep hidden from their