Ⅱ “Public welfare” and “political economy” in Dazai Shundai
In the event that any contradiction arise among “interests” and the activity of giving priority to “interests” even if lowering the gain of “the world and the nation” in the long term is not prohibited, or in the case that “interests” can be temporarily restricted to increase the gain of society, would it be “beneficial” to establish institutions based on the urgency of current affairs in light of “public welfare”? It was Dazai Shundai (1680‐1747) who set up such a political and economic subject in the shogunate system.
1. The economic design and “public welfare” in Dazai
Political economy is to govern the world and the nation with “the administration of affairs of state”, that is, …show more content…
In the case that people in “the present time” is certainly suffering from “disease of profit”, even if cooperative behaviour was known as permanent public interest as “usual reason”, institutions “from the old days economy to modern times” would be the same as having left neglected “the poverty institution to all four people” (Dazai 1729, pp.403,411). In other words, political economy by Dazai was “to increase or decrease institutions”, reducing interests associated with uncooperative actions for public benefit, or stimulating interests associated with cooperative actions, as long as “the present time” assumes “the economy from ancient times was not the same as the present economy”. And then it was a program to achieve “public welfare” and “social security”, through the politics of money and goods and price levelling by“profit and loss” from “increase or decrease …show more content…
Search in “the road to public welfare by interests”
In this way, the system of Dazai based on “Time, Reason, Dynamics, and Emotions” was “to utilize the politics of money and goods” accompanied by moral, was to induce profits from “public welfare”. Therefore “to use resources reasonably” from “public welfare” was to constantly stabilize the lives of people (Dazai 1729, pp.396, 488; The Shujing “Daegeum”).
So if the four elements were adaptable like the situation of “the ancient kings” , ideas of “the ancient system” by “public welfare by interests” might have been realized. However, if political economy and its subjects (political leaders) are unable to cope with “the present world” between “Emotions” and “the ancient system”, they have a serious dilemma there and then will lead to a stage where a macro imbalance must be reformed. And with that, in order to resolve the inconsistency of “the present world” and to relieve the people, the necessity of “the institution establishment” (active institution introduction by the political subject) that directly intervenes in “the world” and can induce “benefits of public welfare for the people” through coordinating the interests, is
In the event that any contradiction arise among “interests” and the activity of giving priority to “interests” even if lowering the gain of “the world and the nation” in the long term is not prohibited, or in the case that “interests” can be temporarily restricted to increase the gain of society, would it be “beneficial” to establish institutions based on the urgency of current affairs in light of “public welfare”? It was Dazai Shundai (1680‐1747) who set up such a political and economic subject in the shogunate system.
1. The economic design and “public welfare” in Dazai
Political economy is to govern the world and the nation with “the administration of affairs of state”, that is, …show more content…
In the case that people in “the present time” is certainly suffering from “disease of profit”, even if cooperative behaviour was known as permanent public interest as “usual reason”, institutions “from the old days economy to modern times” would be the same as having left neglected “the poverty institution to all four people” (Dazai 1729, pp.403,411). In other words, political economy by Dazai was “to increase or decrease institutions”, reducing interests associated with uncooperative actions for public benefit, or stimulating interests associated with cooperative actions, as long as “the present time” assumes “the economy from ancient times was not the same as the present economy”. And then it was a program to achieve “public welfare” and “social security”, through the politics of money and goods and price levelling by“profit and loss” from “increase or decrease …show more content…
Search in “the road to public welfare by interests”
In this way, the system of Dazai based on “Time, Reason, Dynamics, and Emotions” was “to utilize the politics of money and goods” accompanied by moral, was to induce profits from “public welfare”. Therefore “to use resources reasonably” from “public welfare” was to constantly stabilize the lives of people (Dazai 1729, pp.396, 488; The Shujing “Daegeum”).
So if the four elements were adaptable like the situation of “the ancient kings” , ideas of “the ancient system” by “public welfare by interests” might have been realized. However, if political economy and its subjects (political leaders) are unable to cope with “the present world” between “Emotions” and “the ancient system”, they have a serious dilemma there and then will lead to a stage where a macro imbalance must be reformed. And with that, in order to resolve the inconsistency of “the present world” and to relieve the people, the necessity of “the institution establishment” (active institution introduction by the political subject) that directly intervenes in “the world” and can induce “benefits of public welfare for the people” through coordinating the interests, is